Sort version, there are other complex and delicate physical or biochemical differences beyond merely the "visible sex organs", for example, while the outdated myth that testosterone is strictly the "male sex hormone", with it, in reality existing both in men and women, with levels varying (e.x. a female pro athlete, may actually have higher testosterone than an "average" male), women in general tend to have more estrogen, and men more testosterone.Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 7:32 pmYou are free to believe whatever you like, but do not forget that what you believe is true, is not necessarily true, right, nor correct?
How is what I said here absurd and denialistic to you? .IvoryBlackBishop wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:14 pmThe "sexual organs" are the result of genetics, so that statement, of course is scientifically absurd and denialistic.Therefore, to me, from what I have observed, there is no difference at all between men and women besides the sexual organs of the physical body.
What do you assume and/or believe I am denying exactly?
Of course the sexual organs are the result of genetics. That can be clearly seen in what I said
That is EXACTLY what I have been saying.IvoryBlackBishop wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:14 pmWhether we are talking male or female humans, or male and females of any other species; such as peacocks; the observable differences are the result of genetics..
What are you even on about?IvoryBlackBishop wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:14 pmhttps://www.scribd.com/document/6754889 ... cent-Males
It has, no offense but your assertion is as ridiculous as denying 9th grade biology..This observation will obviously remain the same until you or another shows anything differently.
It appears that you do not even know or understand what I am asserting here.
Genetics.IvoryBlackBishop wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:14 pmWhat causes the sex organs to develop the way they do to begin with?
This is also EXACTLY what I have been saying as well.IvoryBlackBishop wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:14 pm It's not like the stork just waives a "magic wand" and decides to give baby A male organs, and baby B female organs when he delivers them to mommy and daddy.
In the context of human potential, it's obvious that individual men and women can excel at things that others can't, there are male and female chess masters, male and female celebrity chefs, male and female athletes, male and female artists, male and female entrepreneurs, and so on..
I do not even know what you are commenting on.IvoryBlackBishop wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:14 pmRegardless, this has no bearing on the reality of biology, and has more to do with culture, philosophy, and human potential, and since most of the arguments here just boil down to immature clichés and stereotypes which aren't even true to begin with, outside perhaps of very limited social contexts, I find it not worth commenting on.
You apoear to be saying that I am wrong, but you write as though you agree with exactly what I have been, and am, saying here.
Likewise, there are other physical differences and nuances, such as bone structure (e.x. the bone structure of the hips in men and women is different).