But that is just a belief.
If not a belief...then show the mind as evidence for the claim - does the mind have an image that can be physically seen by the claimer?
.
What is just a belief?
No, and that is why I say God, in the spiritual sense, is the Mind.
Then no physical eye has ever seen God....So no God has ever been seen...so can that which is invisible have an existence ? or even be known except as a word that only implies the non physical quality of that word?
But if there is only God/Consciousness.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2020 1:46 amI KNOW.
This is WHY I do NOT start a thread in this forum.
Adult human beings only care about expressing their own views about what they believe is true. They do not care about what "others" think and see.
This is WHY I say what I want to express I will save for another day.
But the 'label' DOES NOT have any awareness...the label is just an idea KNOWN....in what is ALWAYS OPEN STILL SILENT PRESENCE AWARENESS.
But they have. They see God, in the physical sense, as the Universe, Itself.
But I just explained how God is seen with the physical eyes, and, everything that can not be seen with the physical eyes are SEEN, and UNDERSTOOD, with the Mind's Eye.
You are so far astray now that it will be hard to get you back on track again.
When words like 'emotions', 'wind', 'thoughts', 'Mind', et cetera are used by you, are they also not actually saying anything are they?
How long have you been under the illusion that if some thing can not be seen with the physical eyes, then it can not be seen, understood, and/or known either?
But the word JOY does not EXPLAIN what JOY is... Don't you understand? this is what I am trying to tell you.
To me thought and language are two separate things so are not the sameAge wrote:Well since you were a baby then how did you think without language ?surreptitious57 wrote:
Language is more complex than thought because it has to be learned therefore thought existed first because it is natural
A baby can think for itself on a very primitive level but it cannot read or write or speak without being taught those skills
That is what those words specifically mean to you but not necessarily what they mean to someone elseAge wrote:
I have already explained a few times already that God in the physical visible sense
is the Universe Itself and God in the spiritual non visible sense is the Mind
Who ever even said there was?Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:30 amBut if there is only God/Consciousness.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2020 1:46 amI KNOW.
This is WHY I do NOT start a thread in this forum.
Adult human beings only care about expressing their own views about what they believe is true. They do not care about what "others" think and see.
This is WHY I say what I want to express I will save for another day.
Then there is no OTHER conscious of this consciousness.
Correct.
This is what I have been saying.
Considering I have been saying there is just Consciousness, then this stands to reason.
But Consciousness is not unconscious of any thing. Consciousness, by definition, is conscious of EVERY thing that is happening and occurring.
The word 'evolution' just refers to and means 'change'. Nothing else, and obviously the Universe, Itself, is changing. Through change a species has evolved with the intelligence to create a language, and use words, to describe and define absolutely EVERY thing there IS.
The Universe, Itself, has evolved into being Truly aware and conscious of Its Self.
And as 'I' have been saying, for a while now, Consciousness is able to KNOW Its Self.
Which is what 'I' have been saying all along.
Of which all of this is very simple and very easy to do, that is; Once 'you' know HOW. Only once 'you' have the know-how of some thing, only then you can do it.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:30 am The experience of self-awareness itself is the cause by which consciousness arises. Moments in an eternal now. .moment after moment.
A thought, a smell, a sight, a feeling, a taste, a sound. .experiencing it, knowing it, being conscious of it and letting it go. .time and time again infinitely.
I NEVER said it did.
The label is just an identify of where those thought/words are coming from.
Of COURSE there IS an 'ALWAYS OPEN STILL SILENT PRESENCE AWARENESS'. BUT, within that 'ALWAYS OPEN STILL SILENT PRESENCE AWARENESS', there are about six billion human beings all wanting to be heard, and listened, to over each other.
I agree the label I, to 'you', "dontaskme", is not the true I. I have KNOWN this since the first time you have said it. It is very common knowledge of non-dual speakers to talk about there is no "I".
Which is EXACTLY what I have been saying. Because ABSOLUTELY EVERY thing IS relative to the observer, then what one observer is expressing that is not in agreement with absolutely EVERY one as One, then it is obviously not of that much importance anyway and is just some thing which has obviously only come about from their own personal past experiences.
From the perspective of absolutely Everyone as One, then whatever is agreed with and accepted is thee absolute. This is HOW thee absolute Truth of things is gained and SEEN, and also, by the way, HOW the knowledge of what is right and wrong in Life is also obtained and gained.
I understand this. But I have never been talking about "JOY", nor have I ever been talking about explaining JOY.
Okay, but I will continue to tell you 'this' can be explained, very simply and very easily.
How many times do you have to be told before you come to realize and understand; I do NOT believe any thing?Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:56 am If the word JOY is what JOY is ...then explain in words to another what JOY is to you, and see if that WORD JOY can adequately explain the concept so that every SINGLE OTHER body can understand your interpretation of what Joy is to you..in the EXACT same way as you've described it....which is what you believe can happen.
I NEVER said it could.
Which, like every thing else, can be done very easily and very simply also.
If you say so and believe this is what WILL happen, then this is what WILL happen, to and for you.
In relation to feeling words, if I recall correctly, this post and maybe one or two of your other posts is the only time you have said 'one simply cannot put feelings into words'.
If you believe so, then it must be true, to you.
Which is more or less just what I have been saying.
But I have understood the above, before I even started discussing these things with you.
Or, just maybe I ALREADY 'understand'.
That is okay with me, if that is what they are, to you. But, what you said here did not answer the question I posed.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 5:50 amTo me thought and language are two separate things so are not the sameAge wrote:Well since you were a baby then how did you think without language ?surreptitious57 wrote:
Language is more complex than thought because it has to be learned therefore thought existed first because it is natural
A baby can think for itself on a very primitive level but it cannot read or write or speak without being taught those skills
Even if they are the same I will still treat them as if they were separate
VERY, VERY, VERY True.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:01 amThat is what those words specifically mean to you but not necessarily what they mean to someone elseAge wrote:
I have already explained a few times already that God in the physical visible sense
is the Universe Itself and God in the spiritual non visible sense is the Mind
I apologize profusely for not adding the words 'to me' to absolutely EVERY sentence I make. But I have said previously that ABSOLUTELY EVERY thing I say and write here, in this forum, is from my perspective only, and so absolutely EVERY thing I say and write here, is 'to me'.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:01 am But you are stating these definitions as if they were objectively true even if this was not your intention
As I said above, "I apologize profusely for not adding the words "to me" to EVERY sentence I write.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:01 am So it would therefore be better to say this instead [ with only one already ]
I have already explained a few times that to me God in the physical sense
is the Universe Itself and God in the spiritual non visible sense is the Mind
You still don't understand what I am saying do you?Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 8:10 amI understand this. But I have never been talking about "JOY", nor have I ever been talking about explaining JOY.
Do you understand this?
Also, do you understand that people can talk about JOY and "other" people can KNOW what they are talking about?
If you do not understand this, then the reason people can and do KNOW what "others" are talking about, like when talking about JOY is because ALL people have and share common experiences.
So, ALL-OF-THIS can be and is very simple to explain, and just as easy to understand. That is once I KNEW HOW to explain ALL-OF-THIS. Explaining what JOY is has never been about any thing discussed here. But, anyway, JOY is an internal feeling or emotion.
You can only hear and understand YOU anyway. So any NEED is a need that doesn't need to BE
The problem from my perspective is that you speak from a definitive position - that of someone who knows the absolute truthAge wrote:
I apologize profusely for not adding the words to me to absolutely EVERY sentence I make. But I have said previously that ABSOLUTELY
EVERY thing I say and write here in this forum is from my perspective only and so absolutely EVERY thing I say and write here is to me