No it's not. Faith is pretty much a belief without evidence(although one can argue about what "evidence" entails).attofishpi wrote:
A belief in anything is a faith.
Well you apparently didn't believe me the first time so why would I try again? Tell you what give me the gist of it or even give me this conclusion although I'm confused how to answer a conclusion, binary or not and a bit puzzled it is one if it has two results? No idea what a critical level of entropy could be, nor what you mean by "entropy" when you use it?Really? Even after I cut you down to the binary conclusion which you refused to answer in a discussion about the reason we would evolve into a simulation, where entropy has reached a critical level. Yep, I wished I had thread recorded that one, go on, tell me you don't remember yet again.
If you mean that if we were in an ancestor sim then there would be a substrate with presumably an operating system and software to run the sim and then there'd be the creator of the whole lot, any of which we could call 'God' I'd kind of agree, so which one is your 'God'?The only answer you were left with was a positive YES, that we would evolve into a simulation, 'God' would be the AI construct behind what we perceive as reality. ...
Why you think it has to be an A.I. no idea?
I don't have a belief in atheism, I just have an absence of belief in theism or any of the other religious -isms that have an interfering 'God'.Keep up with your foolish belief in atheism though - well done.
Do we? Although bit confused here, do you mean consciousness resides in our head or that it consists of voices in our head. Also by 'consciousness' do you mean self-consciousness or just consciousness? Either way I'd disagree as 'it' is the being of a body with senses, memory and language in an external world and it is not just having a language as to me that is thinking whereas thought comes first.We all hear voices in our head, that is where we understand consciousness to be. ...
But so far all you've described are one or two word utterances from your voices which you rationalise by pattern association with another event. Hardly rational conversation.If the voices were irrational jiberish, then I'd agree that my brain is farting at me. ...
I've done IT support and the examples you gave are not usernames that a user would come up with as they would not use the underscore, you've put these in. What they would do is make one word out of a short memorable, to them, phrase so your examples would not be uncommon it's just that in these cases your subconscious has decided to pattern match in tune with your rationalised beliefs about the voices you hear.In internet support you deal with a lot of usernames, certainly not ones constructed as sentences.
I forgive you as I understand.Strange ultimately you are such a fool.