Henry did you go to the Trump rally in Lousanna ?
I watched it live on TV. Trump was in good form, as usual.
He said that Louisiana has the highest murder rate in America !!!!
Is that true? And if it is, how come Lousanna is so violent ??
Dachshund
You are missing an obvious advantage Lola has. The truck driver can tell Lola to F herself and she can do it.
HA!Nick_A wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:30 amYou are missing an obvious advantage Lola has. The truck driver can tell Lola to F herself and she can do it.
yes it is possible.Nick_A wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:29 pm FDP
Just out of curiousity do you believe it is possible for a woman to become a man as described in the Gospel of Thomas?I see you are claiming that as proved in other discussion, as predicted, just like Veritas does with the bad argument proving there's no God. To dave anyone the bother of reading that odious thread.... a tiny recap is in order.
Atheists should congratulate you for the argument. It proves that a fork can not change category to be jewellery, a boy cannot change category to be a woman, a chair canot be converted into a table ... and therefore it entails that sinners can not be saved, or vice versa.
(114) Simon Peter said to him, "Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life."
Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven."
enjoy!FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:46 pmIndeed, I am now off to the pub, see you guys later.henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:35 pm Nope. One is valid, the other is hooey. Never mind, Flash, as you (essentially) say 'you got better things to do'.
I should have thougth XXX meant a winner in tic-tac-toe.
-1- wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 10:19 amI should have thougth XXX meant a winner in tic-tac-toe.
But I fully condone your yes-man-ness to women. Life has become simple, beautiful, and worry free since I leaned the ancient Chinese secret of saying "yes, Honey, you're right" to my girlfriend.
So what if she is not right? I still say it. It's more important to keep the peace than to argue whether Obama was more of a Marxist and less of a Trotskyite or the other way around.
That's funny, in a way, because police never say to perpetrators of crime, "that's right, Honey", instead, they beat them with billiclubs. To have the identical effect: to keep the peace.
I guess each has his or her own idea how to keep the peace, and it's on a scale like autism is, from "yes honey" to "Fuck you asshole, take this on your teeth" and wham with a bull whip.
'yes dear' = de-balledDachshund wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:44 pm-1- wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 10:19 amI should have thougth XXX meant a winner in tic-tac-toe.
But I fully condone your yes-man-ness to women. Life has become simple, beautiful, and worry free since I leaned the ancient Chinese secret of saying "yes, Honey, you're right" to my girlfriend.
So what if she is not right? I still say it. It's more important to keep the peace than to argue whether Obama was more of a Marxist and less of a Trotskyite or the other way around.
That's funny, in a way, because police never say to perpetrators of crime, "that's right, Honey", instead, they beat them with billiclubs. To have the identical effect: to keep the peace.
I guess each has his or her own idea how to keep the peace, and it's on a scale like autism is, from "yes honey" to "Fuck you asshole, take this on your teeth" and wham with a bull whip.
Hate to tell you this -1-, but I don't think you manage to keep you girlfriend for very long.
Why ?
Because women inherently disrespect and rapidly become contemptuous of "Yes men" who passively capitulate to all of their opinions, desires, demands and other wilful behaviours; and, in short, let them do and say whatever they wish to do and say for "the sake of peace".
It is in the eternal nature of women (normal women) to desire having clear rules and boundaries and punishments set by their husbands/boyfriends in a
domestic relationship. Women are innately mischievous/deceptive/devious and will always test their man with trying/antagonistic behaviours purely to see whether or not he will have the moral fortitude to "draw the line" and rebuke or discipline them regarding errant conduct. This is what women expect from what they view as a worthy, decent, strong (morally) man and if they don't get it, they will very soon disappear en route to finding a male companion who can satisfy they requirements for them.. They (women) are, in many ways, like naughty children (said Nietzsche correctly) who are thankfully reassured when a parent points out and corrects or punishes their intentional misbehaviours. The trick is that the discipline the husband/boyfriend applies to his errant wife must be eminently PATERNALISTIC and genuinely intended to promote their welfare. Such discipline often needs to be firm (sometimes very firm) but always just. Violent of any form (verbal or physical) is, of course, unacceptable; it is also profoundly and inevitably counterproductive.
Regards
Dachshund
So THAT'S how a "man" can "turn into" a woman.
HA!
But how's this...
Or to put it another way, simple selfishness and jealousy, coated with a moral sheen by being framed as concern for "the oppressed."Dachshund wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:49 pm What is the root cause of this disharmony and hostility ? The answer is cultural Marxism which includes Critical Theory, Radical and Socialist feminism, philosophical movements like postmodernism which have overwhelmed schools and Colleges in the US, relativist social constructivism and so on. In a word the fundamental tenets of old-school Marxist communism.