Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:12 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:54 pm
Could you elaborate on this? Where does your evidence come from and how are you defining 'Deadly Terror Attacks'? 'Terror attack' is a grammatical abomination (what a surprise, coming from yanks
) What is a 'deadly terror' and how the fuck do you attack someone with 'a terror'??
'Deadly Terror Attacks' mean someone is killed in each incident.
It is because that some one is killed violently accompanied by threats against non-Muslims that the attack is attributed with the element of terror.
The term 'terror' in this case is from Allah;
- 3:151. We [Allah] shall cast terror [R3B: l-ruʿ'ba] into the hearts of those [infidels] who disbelieve [KFR: kafaru] because they [infidels] ascribe unto Allah partners [ShRK: ashrakū idols and deities], for which no warrant hath been revealed.
Example, the 911 attack is regarded as one such terror attack because the consequences generate terror as intended by the perpetrators in accordance to the above and other related verses from the Quran.
Surely your English cannot be that bad?
When an "american" plane with bombs flies overhead and not knowing when they will drop those bombs is that also classed as terror?
Or does is not matter at all because the people under that bomb laden plane are "muslims"?
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:12 amThe statistics are compiled from News report such as the 911 incidents and other incidents committed by Muslims against non-Muslims.
Given that there are fake-news I agree the results may not be 100% accurate.
However incidents like 911 and the obvious killings by Muslims reported by reputable News media are sufficiently reliable.
911 was NOTHING more than just a tiny little scratch in what is REALLY HAPPENING. You just happen to be on the "side" of the ones who were attacked on 911. Thus your OBVIOUS one-sided perspective on EVERY thing here.
The way you are so full of HATE for the "other side" means that if you were born into islam, then you would be one of the biggest terrorist and KILLERS of non-muslims.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:12 amNote even if we discount the stats by 50%, that is still 17,000++ incidents where non-Muslims are killed by terrorists who are Muslims,
And HOW MANY "muslims" have been killed by terrorists who are from other religions and lands?
Remember to an innocent child ANY plane that is about to drop bombs on them at any time is terrifying. Therefore the people who the bombs are, by definition, terrorists.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:12 amthat quantum is still critical especially when it is related to a religion [where a religion is supposed to be peaceful].
And that religion is peaceful. 'you', human beings, continually misinterpret things for your own self serving purposes.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:12 amAs such even 5000 incidents during that period is still bad when related to a religion and where Islam directly and indirectly command and condone the warring against and killing of non-Muslims.
It is claimed that approximately 270 millions* of non-Muslims had been killed since 1400 years ago as directly linked to the commands of Allah in the Quran.
* need confirmation but it is very likely within 1400 years and Islam did occupy vast areas around the world.
And how many human beings have been killed since about 2000 years ago because of another religion called "christianity"?.
By the way, the quran does NOT command the hurting NOR the killing of human beings. Only to non-believers, which is COMPLETELY and UTTERLY different, as I have been continually TELLING YOU.
It is very easy and very simple to kill a person without hurting nor harming the human body at all. So, it can be done very peacefully, and with absolutely EVERY one being in agreement and harmony with this, as I have been telling you for a while now.