Age wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:36 am
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:10 am
That you could be the same as the mentally ill person claiming to have had experiences with God could be justified with you consulting a psychiatrist.
Other than that, it is your autism again playing with the words 'LOOK AT' and 'WHAT IS".
It is not for me to look and what is.
It is for you to justified what you are seeing as real.
So far you have not provided any proofs to justify what is that you are looking at.
In another perspective you emphasized "IS".
The small letter "is' is merely a copula that connect an subject with a predicate as an object.
Whatever that object is, one need to provide proofs it exists as real.
E.g. This
is an apple can be justified with the empirical evidence the qualities of an apple. This 'is an apple' is conditioned by humans and do not stand by itself.
As for a big cap "IS' I presume you meant a thing-in-itself that is absolute independent of the human self. Tell me if this is wrong.
What you presumed IS completely and utterly WRONG.
I have already suggested WHY it is better to NEVER assume any thing.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:10 amIf that is the case, "IS" is an illusion.
It is NOT the case, so this is completely and utterly moot.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:10 amYou have shown and justify nothing that God is a possibility to be real.
Obviously. I said previously that you are completely incapable of SEEING some things.
As I said previously, which you may have MISSED; You were saying that you have already proven "God is an impossibility to be real" and that it is even a "non starter". YET, here I am having just proven that 'God is a possibility to be real'. So, where does this leave us now EXACTLY?
How many times have I told you that you have shown and justify nothing, OTHER THAN TO YOUR OWN SELF, that "God is an impossibility to be real"?
In other words, the ONLY ONE that you have proven God is an impossibility to be real" is your own self. Even though you continually write that you have proven this, thee Truth IS you have ONLY proven it to 'you'.
When are you going to SEE and UNDERSTAND this FACT?
This means that you have NOT proven, in the True sense, that 'God is a possibility to be real is a non starter'. You have only proven this, in the relative sense, to you, ONLY.
This is WHAT I have been wanting to SHOW here
What I have also been SHOWING here is how you LOOK AT and CRITICIZE the personality of the ones that you are arguing against far more than you do actually LOOK AT and COUNTER the actual words being said.
Even though I made this clear in my last post to you, you still went ahead and remarked here about me in relation to being "autistic", a "schizo", as well as a "mentally ill person", suggesting that I need to see a psychiatrist, and all because I view things differently than you do.
Some readers will be NOTICING who it is who is having the 'psychotic' or 'schizophrenic' issues here as well as who is showing signs of 'mental illness' here. But that is certainly up to them to decide this, and NOT me.
Now, IF you want to get back on track and stay on there, WHAT evidence do you have that proves that 'God is an impossibility to be real'?
I have ALREADY EXPOSED and SHOWN the evidence that I HAVE, which you once again completely MISSED.