SteveKlinko wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 7:56 pm
You are drowning in your own diversionary Gobbledygook. Let me throw you a Life Preserver and remind you that the problem is in the question:
You've been working on this for 20 years and haven't made an in ch of progress. Keep it - you need it more than me.
SteveKlinko wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 7:56 pm
How does an Experience of Redness happen as a result of Neural Activity?
It's pretty obvious that the question isn't the problem. The problem is that you have set your mind up in a way that no answer could ever satisfy you.
Because you aren't casting your doubt on the fidelity of the explanation, you are casting your doubt on the causal arrows connecting concepts.
You can always ask a "How?" question about a causal relationship.
Example: Gravity causes apples to fall to the ground.
How?
SteveKlinko wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 7:56 pm
Furthermore what exactly is that Experience of Redness?
This is an ontological question.
To ask an ontological question, signals doubt as to the nature of your very own "experience of redness".
That's a pretty weird line of skepticism. Do you or do you not experience redness?
Anyway. You have finally convinced me. You are pursuing sophistry, not understanding.
Go find somebody else to run around in circles with.