The guy was probably just tired of all the insults and animosity on this forum. Can't say I blame him.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 7:15 pmUhhh...noone is forcing you here at gunpoint. You are just angry because...well you are convinced what you do is important and valuable and noone really cares.Logik wrote: ↑Wed May 01, 2019 3:01 pm 1. Obtain a temporary e-mail address at https://www.guerrillamail.com
2. Edit your profile and update your e-mail address to the temporary one above.
3. Follow activation instructions in the message received at https://www.guerrillamail.com
4. Generate random password at https://passwordsgenerator.net/ (DO NOT write this down)
5. Edit your profile and update your password.
6. Logout
If it works this post should be final.
Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
-
- Posts: 8686
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6520
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
You can ask him if you want, he's back under the new name Univalence and posting in this very thread. He's also quite capable of joining in the abuse like a top chap. You are the one who has veil his aggression beneath an inch thick layer of self pitying whine.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:05 amThe guy was probably just tired of all the insults and animosity on this forum. Can't say I blame him.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 7:15 pmUhhh...noone is forcing you here at gunpoint. You are just angry because...well you are convinced what you do is important and valuable and noone really cares.Logik wrote: ↑Wed May 01, 2019 3:01 pm 1. Obtain a temporary e-mail address at https://www.guerrillamail.com
2. Edit your profile and update your e-mail address to the temporary one above.
3. Follow activation instructions in the message received at https://www.guerrillamail.com
4. Generate random password at https://passwordsgenerator.net/ (DO NOT write this down)
5. Edit your profile and update your password.
6. Logout
If it works this post should be final.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
And I don't go through the same? Or you? It is an intellectually hostile environment. Take it or leave it.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:05 amThe guy was probably just tired of all the insults and animosity on this forum. Can't say I blame him.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 7:15 pmUhhh...noone is forcing you here at gunpoint. You are just angry because...well you are convinced what you do is important and valuable and noone really cares.Logik wrote: ↑Wed May 01, 2019 3:01 pm 1. Obtain a temporary e-mail address at https://www.guerrillamail.com
2. Edit your profile and update your e-mail address to the temporary one above.
3. Follow activation instructions in the message received at https://www.guerrillamail.com
4. Generate random password at https://passwordsgenerator.net/ (DO NOT write this down)
5. Edit your profile and update your password.
6. Logout
If it works this post should be final.
-
- Posts: 8686
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
That's the truth.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2019 4:08 pmIt is an intellectually hostile environment.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:05 amThe guy was probably just tired of all the insults and animosity on this forum. Can't say I blame him.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
As a newish member I find this to be the case. It is also the most intellectually-challenged philosophy forum I've visited. I've not before come across quite so many people with a poor grasp of the issues being so dogmatic and combatitive in pushing their opinions. It only takes a few to ruin the whole discussion. I've abandoned the idea of having serious conversations here.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
I think what you are coming to recognise is the systemic failure of philosophy (and philosophers) to reach consensus on anything.PeteJ wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 pm It is also the most intellectually-challenged philosophy forum I've visited. I've not before come across quite so many people with a poor grasp of the issues being so dogmatic and combatitive in pushing their opinions. It only takes a few to ruin the whole discussion. I've abandoned the idea of having serious conversations here.
The absence of selection criteria for 'intellectual'.
The absence of selection criteria for 'serious conversation'.
The absence of selection criteria for 'firm grasp' of the issues at hand.
It's philosophy, dude! Without exclusion criteria (e.g garbage disposal) anything goes, really.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
And with continual exclusion we are left quite literally with a fragmented version of reality where any does go.Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:11 pmI think what you are coming to recognise is the systemic failure of philosophy (and philosophers) to reach consensus on anything.PeteJ wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 pm It is also the most intellectually-challenged philosophy forum I've visited. I've not before come across quite so many people with a poor grasp of the issues being so dogmatic and combatitive in pushing their opinions. It only takes a few to ruin the whole discussion. I've abandoned the idea of having serious conversations here.
The absence of selection criteria for 'intellectual'.
The absence of selection criteria for 'serious conversation'.
The absence of selection criteria for 'firm grasp' of the issues at hand.
It's philosophy, dude! Without exclusion criteria (e.g garbage disposal) anything goes, really.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
And this consensus is found in science or religion?Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:11 pmI think what you are coming to recognise is the systemic failure of philosophy (and philosophers) to reach consensus on anything.PeteJ wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 pm It is also the most intellectually-challenged philosophy forum I've visited. I've not before come across quite so many people with a poor grasp of the issues being so dogmatic and combatitive in pushing their opinions. It only takes a few to ruin the whole discussion. I've abandoned the idea of having serious conversations here.
The absence of selection criteria for 'intellectual'.
The absence of selection criteria for 'serious conversation'.
The absence of selection criteria for 'firm grasp' of the issues at hand.
It's philosophy, dude! Without exclusion criteria (e.g garbage disposal) anything goes, really.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
Actually its existence necessitates a purpose in itself considering the existence of one phenomenon requires it to effectively set the grounds for the next phenomenon as all phenomenon are nothing in themselves because of their projective, or "evolutionary", capacity.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
It may necessitate purpose. It does not necessitate fitness for that purpose.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:23 pm Actually its existence necessitates a purpose in itself considering the existence of one phenomenon requires it to effectively set the grounds for the next phenomenon as all phenomenon are nothing in themselves because of their projective, or "evolutionary", capacity.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
False, as all phenomenon as existing having positive and negative qualities where they are always fit for one purpose but not for another. In these respects all phenomenon are meaningful considering a loop occurs where:Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:25 pmIt may necessitate purpose. It does not necessitate fitness for that purpose.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:23 pm Actually its existence necessitates a purpose in itself considering the existence of one phenomenon requires it to effectively set the grounds for the next phenomenon as all phenomenon are nothing in themselves because of their projective, or "evolutionary", capacity.
1. A is fit for B, but not C.
2. C is fit for D but requires B.
3. A is fit for C in the context of the whole progression but not the relative localized position in its specific time.
The question of fitness is defined by connection in these respects, where the connection in the above example is strictly a linear progression which sets the premise for evolution as the process of time.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
What purpose is philosophy fit for?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:32 pm False, as all phenomenon as existing having positive and negative qualities where they are always fit for one purpose but not for another. In these respects all phenomenon are meaningful considering a loop occurs where:
1. A is fit for B, but not C.
2. C is fit for D but requires B.
3. A is fit for C in the context of the whole progression but not the relative localized position in its specific time.
The question of fitness is defined by connection in these respects, where the connection in the above example is strictly a linear progression which sets the premise for evolution as the process of time.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 10638
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
Discerning the true backbone to the nature of reality.Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 7:48 pmWhat purpose is philosophy fit for?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:32 pm False, as all phenomenon as existing having positive and negative qualities where they are always fit for one purpose but not for another. In these respects all phenomenon are meaningful considering a loop occurs where:
1. A is fit for B, but not C.
2. C is fit for D but requires B.
3. A is fit for C in the context of the whole progression but not the relative localized position in its specific time.
The question of fitness is defined by connection in these respects, where the connection in the above example is strictly a linear progression which sets the premise for evolution as the process of time.
Re: Logik's guide to successful detox from Philosophy Now
Given two competing theories as to the 'nature of reality' how do you discern which one is more true?