Greta wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:27 am
I note that your own ntire post is an implied ad hominem argument.
Naw. It was a request for no more of those. I didn't say, "Greta's a bad person, so we should all ignore her views." But that was essentially your argument against Henry. I just said you should stop that.
You and Henry adopt strong PC stances when it suits you.
That's pretty funny. I've been accused of many things, but kowtowing to PCness is not one of them. I must file that one away.
Henry will like that, too.
Simply, to prioritise an embryo, an insensate piece of protoplasm, over an adult woman only reveals ignorance and prejudice.
You've assumed your conclusion, and begged the question there. You've smuggled in the phrase "insensate piece of protoplasm" instead of "human child." That's a no-no. There's no question at all that, say, third-trimester abortions are about more than "protoplasm," and that that "piece" is fully sensate. And second and first-term ones are not much clearer in that regard. Moreover, you've skipped the point that the child, if not aborted, will definitely become a full adult in every sense that your putative "adult woman" is. So that's one heck of an oversight.
It is simply a desire to control women..keep rejection you...hence your presence here.
Hilarious, vastly amusing, and again, totally
ad hominem too. You are not exactly flattering any men here, if your contention is that the reason for being on this site is as you characterize it.
Now, really, Greta: is this the point where I'm supposed to come back with some sharp-tongued insult starting with the phrase, "Yeah, well, you just....", followed by some vile personal insult about your own sexual integrity or appeal to men? But seriously, how would that take the debate forward? How would that be a sensible response? So I don't do that stuff. You shouldn't either.
Let us just drop the
ad hominems, and deal with the truth, shall we? Enough of the cotton-fluff.
