Speakpigeon wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 12:27 pmYou didn't understand the question.
And then, tell me why [clocks] should remain synchronised at all if time doesn't exist.
I overcomplicate things I think. It is quite simple.
P1: Two clocks are in sync.
P2: Time does not exist
So far so good. Nothing inconsistent.
P3: The clocks are not in sync.
C1: P3 contradicts P1. The clocks are in sync and not in sync, and in the same way. Thus P3 is false. If time doesn't exist, clocks in sync must be in sync.
If we remove P2 we can have the clocks be in sync at one time and not in sync at another time.
So your question is trivial. If time doesn't exist, then a pair of clocks in sync and not in sync is a contradiction. If time does exist, it isn't a contradiction anymore since time allows them to change from being in sync to being not in sync. So the more relevant question is why (accurate) clocks stay in sync if time exists. If time doesn't exist, the answer is trivial.