I meant to write young, not you. Perhaps Freudian?
Define pay?
Cash on the barrel-head. Credit cards leave a trail. That's why the US is evolving to a cashless society ... not by accident.
I meant to write young, not you. Perhaps Freudian?
Ol’ Joe was once laying hands on a woman at a Christmas party and her Secret Service agent husband had to be restrained from laying hands on Joe. Ol’ Joe likes to swim nude in his home pool when female secret service agents are assigned to guard him. From this I would infer that his guards have the duty of not letting him out of their sight.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2019 3:23 pm It seems that men -- as a result of social upbringing and patterns -- think that the world, and everything that is fairly accessible to them, is for their use -- to play with or destroy. Yes? No?
They may be good men in most respects -- they just don't know any better -- and that makes them bad for others, in a way.
I don't know why you say stupid stuff like this. It's so obviously distorted to bolster/serve your own cockeyed views. Both Joe Biden and Trump have characteristics that make them unappealing to many people! You really shouldn't lump all "Democrats" into one mindset -- that just makes you look ignorant. Of course there are corrupt Democrats AND Republicans, and I (personally) would like them ALL booted out. I would love term limits, no one over 62, every vote counts (no electoral college), and MORE parties/interests represented! The Republican vs. Democrat rant (which you so dearly love) is as old and tired as the ideas coming out of both parties. You are surely smarter than this...or maybe you've just gotten too old to think/speak in a more current and broad context?Walker wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2019 6:09 pm Ol’ Joe is currently the Dem favourite for the 2020 presidental race even though he hasn’t declared his candidacy.
He very well could have arranged the current kerfluffel about his boorish behavior, himself, through layers of assistants and innuendo, to make it old news and all in the past and behind us, to make it just a misunderstanding before the real race begins. Why are you digging up that old stuff on old Joe, they will say. He’s a good guy, he's woke.
Trump was pilloried for merely describing the gold-digging ways of women who “sleep” their way to success.
If Trump was a mauler like Ol’ Joe, you know he would have been crucified. However, since Joe’s a Dem, no problemo. Dems mostly get a pass.
Just look at the three top Dems in Virginia government. Weeks and weeks ago 2 of them were found in blackface photos, and one is accused of sexual molestation. They’re sitting tight, no reportage, no campaigns by feminists to oust them.
For the Progs, women’s rights takes a back seat to political power.
Walker, what happened to you? It is you who appears to have gone insane. You were weirdly single-minded before but Trump's gaslighting seems to have pushed you into full blown obsession.
So you acknowledge that balance is not a possibility in your childish playground view. And you see nothing wrong with that.
Your dishonesty makes you look foolish.LW wrote:So you acknowledge that balance is not a possibility in your childish playground view. And you see nothing wrong with that.
Lacewing wrote:I would love term limits, no one over 62, every vote counts (no electoral college), and MORE parties/interests represented!
I didn’t bring up the topic. You did.Walker in reply wrote:Know why a wall was put up before you tear it down, Leftie.
You don't even know why that electoral college wall was put up, do you.
I'm not being dishonest. I'm honestly pointing out the absurd limitations of your view.
Who cares?
Such statements reveal a profound level of stupidity.
What is the purpose?
You did, enough to dishonestly twist my comment about not being wishy-washy into a lie, as evidenced in your own words quoted next, Leftist.LW wrote:Who cares?
I know you care so don’t worry, it’s no problem. I’m wise to the dishonest ways of the Left.LW wrote:So you acknowledge that balance is not a possibility in your childish playground view. And you see nothing wrong with that.
You are free to look it up for yourself. There are many sources. Knock yourself out.
There was no debate about you being wishy-washy. You claimed that you could not hold up both sides for balance. Why not?
If you consider being delusional as wise.
True... but that's only noticeable to the non-delusional. Chances are you will continue to imagine whatever you like for as long as it serves your out-of-balance thinking.
There's the shame. He was once capable of discussion and was occasionally responsive to reason. Now he has become an extremist, seeing the battle against the irredeemably evil "Left" as a kind of desperate holy war that must be won at all costs or disaster will follow.