information It's everywhere. 1s and 0s. Trues and Falses.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:10 am I have to say I like your background even if we might not be precisely in agreement.
This actually proves something about reality itself and similar to what I used to demonstrate HOW you can begin with absolutely nothing in totality to derive something. That is, you think that the computer program is presenting a contradiction when it is actually the underlying logic of reality itself (as a whole).
I can't decide if Aristotle made an error of if he was a genius.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:10 am 1,0
0 == (0 and 1)
but
1 != (0 and 1)
...which implies that 1 can only equal itself.... an Identity.
See! Inversion!Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:10 am Assigning 0 to (A == A) is equivalent to assigning 0 == 1 in a way that one might say, "From nothing, we can get something."
Eventually you start questioning those damn "laws" and you begin to contradict THEM out of our own mind.
And you emerge on the other side with intuitionistic logic.
The laws are like training wheels until you can learn to think
And then you can take off the training wheels yourself.
I am going to finish responding to the rest of your post in the morning. It's 2am. My brain scanned over it and said "cannot compute".