Atla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:09 pm
What lies beyond monism is pretty off topic here.
OK. but you aren't beyond monism.
You are on the wrong side of Cartesian dualism.
You can't even read a 3 line argument without splitting it into parts.
You'll probably turn the universe into chopped mince.
Again: most people's brains process context.
So they will normally interpret "is" two different ways in those 3 lines.
That's normal.
This has pretty much nothing to do with Cartesian dualism or monism, no idea where you got that from.
We CAN interpret "is" only one way. You actually are that stupid to believe that people can't do that if they want to?
Except then all communication in English (or pretty much any other language that uses both hemispheres of the human mind) breaks down, becomes unusable.
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:09 pm
What lies beyond monism is pretty off topic here.
OK. but you aren't beyond monism.
You are on the wrong side of Cartesian dualism.
You can't even read a 3 line argument without splitting it into parts.
You'll probably turn the universe into chopped mince.
Again: most people's brains process context.
So they will normally interpret "is" two different ways in those 3 lines.
That's normal.
This has pretty much nothing to do with Cartesian dualism or monism, no idea where you got that from.
We CAN interpret "is" only one way. You actually are that stupid to believe that people can't do that if they want to?
Except then all communication in English (or pretty much any other language that uses both hemispheres of the human mind) breaks down, becomes unusable.
Do you get it now?
I'll start another thread so we can fix the bug in your brain. And so that you can understand that context-switching is directly related to monism/pluralism.
For now - this is the problem with your "solution'
P1. John is human ( A ∈ C )
P2. Jane is Human ( B ∈ C )
P3. John is Jane ( A ∈ B )
Logik wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:10 pm
OK. but you aren't beyond monism.
You are on the wrong side of Cartesian dualism.
You can't even read a 3 line argument without splitting it into parts.
You'll probably turn the universe into chopped mince.
Again: most people's brains process context.
So they will normally interpret "is" two different ways in those 3 lines.
That's normal.
This has pretty much nothing to do with Cartesian dualism or monism, no idea where you got that from.
We CAN interpret "is" only one way. You actually are that stupid to believe that people can't do that if they want to?
Except then all communication in English (or pretty much any other language that uses both hemispheres of the human mind) breaks down, becomes unusable.
Do you get it now?
I'll start another thread so we can fix the bug in your brain. And so that you can understand that context-switching is directly related to monism/pluralism.
For now - this is the problem with your "solution'
P1. John is human ( A ∈ C )
P2. Jane is Human ( B ∈ C )
P3. John is Jane ( A ∈ B )
Ooops!
Looks like you don't have the ability to understand the above in some way.
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:22 pm
Again: most people's brains process context.
So they will normally interpret "is" two different ways in those 3 lines.
That's normal.
This has pretty much nothing to do with Cartesian dualism or monism, no idea where you got that from.
We CAN interpret "is" only one way. You actually are that stupid to believe that people can't do that if they want to?
Except then all communication in English (or pretty much any other language that uses both hemispheres of the human mind) breaks down, becomes unusable.
Do you get it now?
I'll start another thread so we can fix the bug in your brain. And so that you can understand that context-switching is directly related to monism/pluralism.
For now - this is the problem with your "solution'
P1. John is human ( A ∈ C )
P2. Jane is Human ( B ∈ C )
P3. John is Jane ( A ∈ B )
Ooops!
Looks like you don't have the ability to understand the above in some way.
I understood everything you said Just fine.
Did you understand what I said?
There is a bug in your brain. Nature made an error. I am the upgraded version.
Logik wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:39 pm
I'll start another thread so we can fix the bug in your brain. And so that you can understand that context-switching is directly related to monism/pluralism.
For now - this is the problem with your "solution'
P1. John is human ( A ∈ C )
P2. Jane is Human ( B ∈ C )
P3. John is Jane ( A ∈ B )
Ooops!
Looks like you don't have the ability to understand the above in some way.
I understood everything you said Just fine.
Did you understand what I said?
There is a bug in your brain. Nature made an error. I am the upgraded version.
No, the bug is in your brain.
I can use both hemispheres if I want to, and I can also use a monist logic if I want to.
That's why formal logic was invented for example.
I can do both, you only know the latter.
You are an unfortunate downgrade. Do you get it now?