All Problems are Rooted in Ideology and Intuition

[Eodnhoj7]

All problems are rooted in an ideology and intuition.

The idea is the form we mold materiality too. Intuition is the directive force. It leads us to Philosophy, Science and Religion and leads us to the question of:

How to Deal with Philosophy, Science, Religion?

Kill the ideology of the Left with the Munchausseen Trillima. Kill the Right too, for they are just tomorrow's left. Kill capitalism. Kill Communism. Kill Nazism. Kill the Nihilism which fathered them all.

War, restructuring society, etc.... none of it will do any good if the ideologies which give form to these phenomenon are still ingrained within the structure of man. Philosophy must die. Religion must die. Modern Reason must die. What we understand of "family" from weak father figures who could not guide there wives with any sense of compassion or respect, and the "whores" of mother we have who go threw life trying to fill themselves with whatever "newness" unfoldinging from the will...all must die. It's all polluted. Let it all die.

Kill the ideology and you kill the problem...because that is all an idea is: a little cookie cutter knife that fragments reality into cute little shapes...that mean nothing except some deluded cathartic stagnation.


Most leftist ideology is strictly an extension of unbounded self-defeating science, where a continual atomism occurs and gives an illusion of knowledge through the perpetual division of facts. We create a tool to make make things more efficient, to "control" time, that is...considering all phenomena that are material effectively are just one thing: "time".

In dividing time we divide the inherent identity of the self interwoven into it. There is no "rest" because there is no ability to lose oneself to a continuum. There is no work...because there is no real continuum. And why is there no continuum, because continuuity is a subjective experience set within the hearts and minds of man.

What there is is a dark fog of philosophies, theologies, fun little factoids and viagra commercials showing how sterile we really are in obtaining any sense of creative meaning. Noone thinks. Noone works. Noone even really fucks.


We divided one activity into another, one concept into another...hell we make tools just to make tools... all in a simple attempt to do one thing:

Create a singularity where we are everything and everywhere in one moment. The problem occurs is that 1=0 and the singularity, the "whole", was already observed by the ancients...cutting up reality into interesting little...well "whatever's" because even language is turning into a homogenous mass of emojis, is just a perpetual movement to point zero.

It is an institutionalized death drive. Hell I can just walk down the street and all the "signs" (no trespassing, stop, etc.) just scream "stay away" from unknown master's who perfected some little masturbatory craft of creating there own little universe...there own little "ego's" where they control something.


What we control, noone really knows because it is just a process of "imagining" stuff...which is really fitting since the most powerful industry is the entertainment industry.

The problem is the in being "everywhere", in watching all the forms fold into further forms...everything is just a burning fire, a chaos of perpetual folding dramas where everyone is trying to "heroically" create some sense of the "I"...just so they can fit in and avoid being an outcast. Heroism is the new cowardice.


This applies to the nature of human relations as well, the psyche so to speak, where what constitutes any natural identity is effectively broken apart and rearranged. The problem is that in rearranging one requires "nature" so the fabric of reality, given time, will revert to its natural structure. We use circular reasoning to avoid circular reasoning, not realizing it is just an attempt to control not just our own judgements but how we will be judged.

And that is the problem...judgement. Seperating the wheat from the chaff, never really realizing the wheat existed all along because of the chaff. And that is the problem, which is a problem of a problem of a problem of a problem...blah, blah, blah.

The greatest problem is the problem.

The problem with philosopher's today is that they really are without any sense of depth. They want to fit in with the scientists, the theologians...etc. They want to be "loved" and "admired" by the masses by producing some little clever...whatever. And it is reduced to producing a "whatever" considering the sole mantra of the generations they are trying to impress is "whatever".

They want to produce something, but all there kids are what the other kids beat up. They think if they cloth themselves in the fancy conceptualization of the romans somehow they will carry out the maxim "when in Rome...". And they all think this and where they don't it pops up as a wet dream.

What the philosopher's fail to realize is that Rome was built in a day, it was built when the smaller man realized all he had to do what stab the "stronger barbarian" in the throat with

And that is history. There was no glorious battle, just men castrating and cutting the throats of other men. Then someone came along and said "Well...this seems to work...let's build off these foundations."

Munchhausen Trillema the f'ck out of everything, and when that is villified point out it is only villified because people want to believe it is some other way...when it really isn't.

Let circular reasoning be the crown he places on his the head of his enemy to mock his kingship.

Let the thorns of infinite regress pierce his psyche.

Run the pointed tip of "accepted axioms" through his side into his heart.

Mock the anti-christ, the great nazi intellectualism brought about by Neitzche, the repressive "zeitgeist" we all know we gain our identities from under the current state. It claims "immortality"...let is prove itself.

Let the current priest class see if they can act as the messiah's they claim to be. Crucify them because we all want to seem some rabbit pulled out the hat type of miracle. We want to see the rabbit pulled out the hat because we want to see how deep the rabbit hole goes.

[Logik]

And when you burn everything to the grounds, where to next?

[Eodnhoj7]

And when you burn everything to the grounds, where to next?

When everything burns, next won't be a question to ponder.

The problem is reason.

[Logik]

When everything burns, next won't be a question to ponder.

The problem is reason.

Есть человек — есть проблема, нет человека — нет проблемы

[commonsense]

And when you burn everything to the grounds, where to next?

When everything burns, next won't be a question to ponder.

The problem is reason.

In other words, the problem is the solution to the problem.

[Eodnhoj7]

And when you burn everything to the grounds, where to next?

When everything burns, next won't be a question to ponder.

The problem is reason.

In other words, the problem is the solution to the problem.

The problem is "the problem".

Reason must end Reason, Sanity must end Sanity.

What we constitute as "Rational" and "Sane"...does not work either at the individual or group level.

"Sanity" is just as much the problem as reason, precisely because we use it as some measuring ruler we found while playing in a dead leaf pile of opinion and thought. Like kids we used it to build a few sandcastles and then thought: "Oh my God...This little stick makes me a god." We failed to take into account...it just fell off a tree and we were playing around in the refuse of the tree, because of our inability to look up.

Philosophy has to go back to a time even before the pre-socratics.

It has to look inside of itself to its own unknown origins.

Plato, Aristotle....Wittgenstein, Neitzche....there are as many names as their are ways to be confused, ways to percieve as there are ways to go mad. Noone every asked...maybe we are afraid of letting go of them because they provide us stories that warm our thoughts in the cold night.

They are just stories around a camp fire father's tell their kids when the child wonders what lies in the darkness.

The problem is that these stories ended up morphing into the ghosts that lie in the darkness, so we create new stories to explain them. We create ghosts to illuminate the boundaries of the unknown. And then when they come back to haunt us, we blame "them", all the while torn whether or not to ask them for advice.

The story could have just be avoided altogether if the father kept quiet and just quietly pointed to the white lights in the night sky, watching the past from the future.

[Eodnhoj7]

When everything burns, next won't be a question to ponder.

The problem is reason.

Есть человек — есть проблема, нет человека — нет проблемы

"There is a person-there is a problem, there is no person-no problem"

Can't eliminate that which does not even know its own identity.

[Logik]

Can't eliminate that which does not even know its own identity.

By Munchhausen - our identity is "that which can never know its own identity".

We can eliminate that which can never know its own identity. Ask the dinosaurs.

[Eodnhoj7]

Can't eliminate that which does not even know its own identity.

By Munchhausen - our identity is "that which can never know its own identity".

We can eliminate that which can never know its own identity. Ask the dinosaurs.

By the Munchhausen being applied to the Munchhausen we are left with both the Munchhausen as a negative continuum while observing a Prime Triad (all axioms are points of origin, all axiom definition is linear, all axioms are self-referential and self maintained circularity) where this dualism observes "space" as the foundational axiom as itself.

I could ask the dinosaurs, more and more experts are claiming they are related to the chickens we eat everyday as well as continual excavations in south america pulling up carved stones showing people riding dinosaurs.

[Logik]

Can't eliminate that which does not even know its own identity.

By Munchhausen - our identity is "that which can never know its own identity".

We can eliminate that which can never know its own identity. Ask the dinosaurs.

By the Munchhausen being applied to the Munchhausen we are left with both the Munchhausen as a negative continuum while observing a Prime Triad (all axioms are points of origin, all axiom definition is linear, all axioms are self-referential and self maintained circularity) where this dualism observes "space" as the foundational axiom as itself.

I could ask the dinosaurs, more and more experts are claiming they are related to the chickens we eat everyday as well as continual excavations in south america pulling up carved stones showing people riding dinosaurs.

The prime triad/triadic logic is isomorphic to computation.

All propositions are either true, false or indeterminate.

[Eodnhoj7]

By Munchhausen - our identity is "that which can never know its own identity".

We can eliminate that which can never know its own identity. Ask the dinosaurs.

By the Munchhausen being applied to the Munchhausen we are left with both the Munchhausen as a negative continuum while observing a Prime Triad (all axioms are points of origin, all axiom definition is linear, all axioms are self-referential and self maintained circularity) where this dualism observes "space" as the foundational axiom as itself.

I could ask the dinosaurs, more and more experts are claiming they are related to the chickens we eat everyday as well as continual excavations in south america pulling up carved stones showing people riding dinosaurs.

The prime triad/triadic logic is isomorphic to computation.

All propositions are either true, false or indeterminate.

Indeteriminate is either true or false in its existence, or rather "both/and" or "neither/nor"...thus leading to triad within a triad.

[Logik]

Indeteriminate is either true or false in its existence, or rather "both/and" or "neither/nor"...thus leading to triad within a triad.

Notice how your mind switches between "declarative" and "interpretative" modes.

At some you may want to choose a consistent world-view.

[Eodnhoj7]

Indeteriminate is either true or false in its existence, or rather "both/and" or "neither/nor"...thus leading to triad within a triad.

Notice how your mind switches between "declarative" and "interpretative" modes.

At some you may want to choose a consistent world-view.

What switch, all interpretation is a declaration.

[Logik]

What switch, all interpretation is a declaration.

That which predicts everything predicts nothing.

[Eodnhoj7]

What switch, all interpretation is a declaration.

That which predicts everything predicts nothing.

Prediction is just an interpretation of the future.