Tis the Nature of the Poetic, Is it's Stature the Noetic?

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Posts: 5884
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Tis the Nature of the Poetic, Is it's Stature the Noetic?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:14 pm

Poetry binds a sense of romanticism and classical logic into one where quality is the equation in and of itself, self-evident by the observers where beauty is but a "joining" of things; thus giving witness to not just "sense" but a sensing of this "sense".

The Cold and dry classical understanding of reason, the warm and fluid depth of intuition, burns this pathway of definition unfolding both images; rendering the mind back to a child-like state and everything is brought back to its origins of a dark blank womb, the passive "void" prior to the penetration of impression.

It enables a joining of the good to the evil, form to the shadow of the self, in a jungian sense of the term while following the dialectical course of Hegel stemming from a rational base in Pythagoras.

Lucretius, in the "Nature of Things", took horror of nature and spun it into a vine of reason intent of bringing forth fruits for the intellect to feast.

"The Song of Songs" a romanticism of romanticism, bound by a logic of psychology and the interplay of the masculine and feminine effectively subjectifying the objective interplay of "force" in the Tao Te Ching.

Odin, a projection of the mind's prison as but a wanderer and madman, brought forth division and war using the bar's of poetry as measuring rods through from which which the weary rest upon as a staff, and the hunter as a spear.

So with all due intent, of which of am currently all but spent,
I present a diatribe to change the philosophical vibe;
a change in course I guess you can say, about reason's "way".
A battle of beauty over the nature of futility.
Dry philosophical horror will not be tolerated, only artistry to be belated.

Of this I will begin,
weighted under the intention to all but cruelly win:

To pick up a rose is to bleed,
and cut oneself off from beauty
curving itself by a beautiful loss.

A finger pricked is the first lead,
towards a path of futility,
concealed by a futile cross.

The blood is but the soul's reed,
swaying gently in a hand's winding flurry,
a hidden fury, subtle.

A print of the finger but a blossoming beed,
the rose a passive impression,
Red, a mirror to impress.

A warning of garnet, sown as a seed,
the crystalization of two bloods as one
a simple gesture left undone.

Oh, the fading of beauty, a quiet need
for a season of winter in the mind of a children,
but this sacrifice is the child.

How much more is the rose to bleed,
through the hands of intention?
Was all of this ever really my intent?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests