Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 am
Age wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:55 am
If you so believe that jumping straight from making your own assumption to deducing a conclusion, without (any) reason is applying science, then so be it.
Science is empiricism + process of elimination. No reason required.
Your definition of 'science' is
empiricism plus process of elimination. What is your definition of 'empiricism'?
Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 am
Age wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:55 am
Who cares?
Apparently you do. You keep asking "Are you 100% certain?"
HOW many posts back was the last time I asked "Are you 100% certain"?
Just to be clear since you answered that you are NEVER 100% certain of any thing, then that was enough clarification for Me. Since then you have have also clarified that:
You do NOT use reason to deduce.
You arrive at a conclusion with absolutely NO need for (any) reason at all.
You also clarified that you are completely unable to justify your responses.
Therefore, if you inform us again:
So my uncertainty about the correctness of answer is still 50%. Then I will most likely again respond back with:
Who cares?.
My response really had nothing whatsoever at all to do with me asking you "Are you 100% certain? of some thing way BEFORE you informed us of the above. In fact to suggest that it was so would be absolutely FALSE. My response had to do with you telling us that your uncertainty about a correctness of an answer is 50%.
Just to make it clear; if your certainty about one of your answers is 100%, then let me KNOW. Because then that is when I care. Otherwise, I really do NOT care how much or how little certainty you have put into any answer whatsoever, including yours, mine, anyone else's, or even a coins. Unless of course I ask you for how much certainty are you giving that answer.
Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 amAge wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:55 am
Without any reason also.
Of course! With deduction instead of reason.
By the way, some be noticing by now how, when BELIEFS search out confirmation biases and grab onto any thing, that they inevitably get STUCK. That is until that BELIEF is changed, removed, or gotten rid of.
Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 amAge wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:55 am
Logik wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:22 amWas that a wrong conclusion?
Was that a right conclusion?
Well it was either the right or the wrong conclusion. 50/50.
Shall we flip a coin again!
WHY the 'we' and the 'again' words here. I have NEVER flipped a coin to find an answer to a question. Only YOU do that sort of thing. And ONLY you do that, that I know of.
Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 amAge wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:55 am
Look you theorized that I could not do some thing. I then did that thing, so I falsified that theory. End of story.
If you had done the thing I asked you to do then it would have been end of story. In that premise I agree entirely.
It just seems to me that we are having difficulty deciding whether you did or didn't do what I asked you to do.
What is that you think you ask me to do?
I also have absolutely NO difficulty in deciding.
Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 amIt's one or the other. 50/50. Shall we flip a coin?
Lol
Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 amIs it not you who keeps saying "The Truth shall be known when everything is in agreement"?
I will agree with you here though.
Although the chances of you even beginning to understand what is happening here now will be very, very low.
Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 amHow do we decide and agree on the right answer?
When you finish with the last point, then we can move onto another one like this one, if that is what you want to move onto now.
I have already done what you said I could NOT do and what I set out to do. I have NO difficulty in deciding that. You, however, appear to disagree with what I SEE. Now, just so that we are all clear here, tell us what you asked me to do, and tell us why, from your perspective, I have, supposedly, NOT done that yet.
Once we are completely finished with this issue, then we can move on.