Thanks Gaylord, but that is a very 'particularist' solution. Do you have a more methodical approach? Something that meets the bar for testability/falsifiability?Greylorn Ell wrote: ↑Thu Nov 29, 2018 5:05 pm Okay..
Care to be transparent about your criterions for:
* nitwit -- Someone smarter than you.
* bullshit -- Everything you write.
* intelligence -- A property that has eluded you.
* contribution -- Something you are too incompetent to make.
Greylorn
You are a scientist after all. You ought to aspire to higher standards than just your own, biased opinion which certainly don't meet the bar for transparency!
Maybe the particularist/methodist distinction is foreign to you (although I doubt it...)
Here's me 'not contributing'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodism_(philosophy)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemol ... ticularism