TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:58 pmYou seem to be concerned only with the descriptive use of language. That's not an exhaustive list of language's uses!creativesoul wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:34 pm So what? The signs/symbols are meaningless without their significant other(what is significant/symbolized).
Again. Descriptive use of language. All that is meaningful needs not be described in language. And yet we do. Why?creativesoul wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:34 pm All interpretation is attributing meaning to that which is already meaningful.
You're concerned with particulars and all sorts of other shit that doesn't really matter here... in this conversation between you and I. I'm providing what's true of them all.
All language is meaningful. What I'm arguing underwrites all meaning. Thus, it underwrite all language use. Thus, it underwrites everything you've said, everything I've said. It underwrites everything ever thought, believed, spoken, written, and/or otherwise uttered. Remarkable that your rejoinders are of the kind that would be argued by someone who hasn't seemed to grasp this yet. Odd, because I think you do. Am I overestimating how well you understand the position I'm arguing for and/or from?