TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:58 pmYou seem to be concerned only with the descriptive use of language. That's not an exhaustive list of language's uses!
Again. Descriptive use of language. All that is meaningful needs not be described in language. And yet we do. Why?
You're concerned with particulars and all sorts of other shit that doesn't really matter here... in this conversation between you and I. I'm providing what's true of them all.
All language is meaningful. What I'm arguing underwrites all meaning. Thus, it underwrite all language use. Thus, it underwrites everything you've said, everything I've said. It underwrites everything ever thought, believed, spoken, written, and/or otherwise uttered. Remarkable that your rejoinders are of the kind that would be argued by someone who hasn't seemed to grasp this yet. Odd, because I think you do. Am I overestimating how well you understand the position I'm arguing for and/or from?