Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Locked
Walker
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Walker »

You have plenty of material, quit whining about what you don't have. Your feedback has been worthless other than as a springboard for pertinent, relevant points that others make, your questions and comments display no comprehension of the material, and you're being an ass.

Your claims of Obama's booming economy are either tragic, or laughable.

You've been shown leniency and consideration, and mercy.

Someone else might have something serious to offer at some time for a real discussion on this topic.

Until then, good luck with your studies and comprehension.

:)
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by uwot »

Walker wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:25 pmYour claims of Obama's booming economy are either tragic, or laughable.
All I said was that on four occasions during Obama's presidency, the US economy grew by more than the 4.1% that Trump is boasting about. Which is true.
Walker wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:25 pmYou've been shown leniency and consideration, and mercy.
There's really no need.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Nick_A »

"even if we can't prevent the forces of tyranny from prevailing, we can at least "understand the force by which we are crushed." Simone Weil

This thread is a good example of why even though we collectively have the potential to understand why freedom must be crushed, we cannot avoid it.

One reason why people prefer statist slavery to freedom is the blame game. That is really a thread of its own but I’ll introduce it here to demonstrate how the deeper philosophical question: “In the ideal society does Man serve the dictates of the state or does the state further the inner needs of Man? The question of the value of freedom and how it is attacked by the Alinsky and the Cloward-Piven strategy is ignored here for example in favor of the blame game and in this case the joy of blaming Trump

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... blame-game

The author concludes with:
With this background in mind, here are 5 reasons we play the blame game.

1. Blame is an excellent defense mechanism. Whether you call it projection, denial, or displacement, blame helps you preserve your sense of self-esteem by avoiding awareness of your own flaws or failings.

2. Blame is a tool we use when we’re in attack mode. Falling into the category of a destructive conflict resolution method, blame is a way to try to hurt our partners.

3. We’re not very good at figuring out the causes of other people's behavior, or even our own. The attributions we make, whether to luck or ability, can be distorted by our tendency to make illogical judgments. And we're just as bad at making judgments involving the blameworthiness of actions in terms of intent vs. outcome.

4. It’s easier to blame someone else than to accept responsibility. There’s less effort involved in recognizing your contributions to a bad situation than in accepting the fact that you're actually at fault, and changing so you don't do it again.

5. People lie. As my colleague, Robert Feldman, discovered, “Everybody lies.” It’s pretty easy just to lie and blame someone else even though you know you’re at fault. You may figure that no one will know it was really you who spilled coffee all over the break room, so you just blame someone else who’s not there (and hope that person never finds out).
Notice how the essential question of freedom vs. statist slavery is no longer the issue. It has degenerated into the attack and defense of Trump. This degeneration is encouraged so as to avoid depth of thought which gets in the way of the blame game.

So IMO Simone is right to insist we have the potential to understand, the blame game is one reason why it is practically impossible and the decline of civilization into statist slavery seems inevitable. Collectively we do not have the temperament to become aware that we are victims of the human condition making human freedom and all it offers our species possible. We prefer the blame game leading to the degeneration of reason and the psychological prison of statist slavery.

To be a modern political thinker for today furthering the abandonment of freedom all you have to remember is to condemn Trump in as nasty a manner as possible and remember "yo momma sucks." Play the blame game. You will inspire all the budding snowflakes.
Walker
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Walker »

uwot wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:59 pm
Walker wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:25 pmYour claims of Obama's booming economy are either tragic, or laughable.
All I said was that on four occasions during Obama's presidency, the US economy grew by more than the 4.1% that Trump is boasting about. Which is true.
Walker wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:25 pmYou've been shown leniency and consideration, and mercy.
There's really no need.
In your right hand, you have Trump in office for two years, winning.
:D

In your left hand, you have decades of Leftist control of government education.
In your left hand, you have mucho indoctrination.
In your left hand, you have the little chillen kept ignorant of citizenship responsibilities, as the survey indicates.
In your left hand, you have Alinsky, which is also the thread topic.
:evil:

And you want to use your right hand.

This could be the cause of the duh duh duh stutter.

Under these conditions, you ask the question:
What has Trump done for education?

Answer: You need to go forth and find a clue, rather than derail the thread.
Walker
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Walker »

Nick_A wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:13 pmThe question of the value of freedom and how it is attacked by the Alinsky and the Cloward-Piven strategy is ignored here for example in favor of the blame game and in this case the joy of blaming Trump.
Exactly.

Cogent, articulate, on-point, truthful.

Good clue.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by uwot »

Walker wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:31 pm...you ask the question:
What has Trump done for education?

Answer: You need to go forth and find a clue...
Okie-dokie.
Walker wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:31 pm...rather than derail the thread.
Well, it was you who said:
Walker wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:06 amBack on topic:
Education – Take control of what people read and listen to us“ take control of what children learn in school.
“Education: A new survey finds that only a third of Americans could pass the U.S. Citizenship test. It's a dismal testament to the abject failure of the country's education system. And a looming threat to the nation's future.”
"Back on topic." Anyway, turns out that Trump's response to the looming threat to the nation's future is to cut education spending by $9 billion. https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budg ... tsheet.pdf
User avatar
Greta
Posts: 4389
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:10 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Greta »

uwot wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 8:29 pm"Back on topic." Anyway, turns out that Trump's response to the looming threat to the nation's future is to cut education spending by $9 billion. https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budg ... tsheet.pdf
If the people are kept ignorant then they will be easier for the church and conservative media to control. Orwell and Huxley saw it coming.

Education at this point of development and globalisation is key to future prosperity. However, education for whom?

I wonder if the humanism that is appropriate for many large societies can work with gigantic populations like in the US? Their society is fragmenting under growing divisions. Looking globally and historically, all of the giant populations seem to be built upon a large mass of "proles" - the uneducated poor. Dictatorships and oligarchies. When a society becomes very large it may be inevitable that they develop this disadvantaged rump on which the well-to-do rely just as they once needed farm animals. If it's happening even in a very rich and advanced society like the US I expect it's inevitable without focused countermeasures.

Trump and his drones would appear to be a conduit for a Zeitgeist based at least in part on physics. The more hot and active an object the more energy is needed to bring it to order. I think the US is on the verge of bringing their governance a step or two towards the style of other giant nations like China and Russia (and India in terms of underhanded dealings). The first step is to shake off governmental accountability bit by bit.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Nick_A »

From the Eight Steps to Socialism:

5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
Greta wrote
Education at this point of development and globalisation is key to future prosperity. However, education for whom?

I wonder if the humanism that is appropriate for many large societies can work with gigantic populations like in the US? Their society is fragmenting under growing divisions. Looking globally and historically, all of the giant populations seem to be built upon a large mass of "proles" - the uneducated poor. Dictatorships and oligarchies. When a society becomes very large it may be inevitable that they develop this disadvantaged rump on which the well-to-do rely just as they once needed farm animals. If it's happening even in a very rich and advanced society like the US I expect it's inevitable without focused countermeasures.
Notice how Greta is unconcerned with freedom. It has already been sacrificed to promoting secular Progressive education and globalization. Welfare, education, and religion have been lumped into indoctrination into serving the secular progressive agenda. The goal of independence has devolved into dependence. Education has devolved into indoctrination and religion has devolved into political correctness. Freedom isn’t considered important and just gets in the way of the goal of statist slavery.

Though a human education is possible it can only be taught by those who have not been indoctrinated into the progressive agenda and its needs to create atoms of the Great Beast in blind obedience to the dictates of the state. Both a human education and recognition of a conscious source for humanity is essential for cooperative freedom which is why it is so hated by secular progressives. The light of human freedom to the progressives is like the light of the sun to vampires. It is intolerable

But this is where we are. The battle is clear. The human attraction to freedom vs statist slavery as an ideal cannot be discussed. Only the blame game is worth pursuing. And when all has fallen into societal descent there is always the cry of “yo momma sucks” to offer partial compenstion
Walker
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Walker »

uwot wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 8:29 pm Anyway, turns out that Trump's response to the looming threat to the nation's future is to cut education spending by $9 billion. https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budg ... tsheet.pdf
So, you throw out some number that you don't understand, don't think about it, wait for others to analyze it, then pick at the analysis while picking your nose.

Got your MO. Some philosopher.

Add that one to the Alinsky methods.

You're right about being like Alinsky.

:lol:

Here, pick at this guy's analysis.

A US teacher’s opinion, with meaningful facts and numbers.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opini ... 222676002/

BEGIN QUOTE

“If only I had a dime for every time I have heard the claim America needs to spend more money on education. As a former public school teacher, it was frequently discussed and often used as an excuse for why U.S. schools aren’t performing as well as they should. But is education funding lacking in America?

“Hardly. The United States spends upwards of $1 trillion per year on education, more than the national defense budget. Even more revealing, the average amount spent on a single 17-year-old American student’s K-12 education — the inflation-adjusted “total cost” incurred over that student’s entire educational career — was greater than $160,000 in 2012. In 1970, it was $55,000.

“You might be tempted to think that although the United States spends a lot on education, perhaps other countries spend more. This, too, is a common (and false) assertion. Americans spend far more than most advanced nations on education.

“Apparently, the United States is spending more than enough taxpayer dollars on education. So, where is all this money going? Increased teacher salaries? No. Improved classroom technology? No. Better educational services for students? Nope.

“Bureaucrats have been the biggest beneficiaries of the huge increase in educational spending over the past few decades. The number of education “administrators” — from the Department of Education down to your local school district — have expanded faster than a middle school rumor.

“From 1950 to 2014, the student population doubled. During that period teachers increased by 243 percent, while administrators and all other staff have skyrocketed by 709 percent.”

“Contrary to what many on the Left say, perhaps the answer to America’s education problems is not to simply spend more money, but rather to use the massive amount of money it is already spending more wisely.”

END QUOTE
Walker
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Walker »

Greta wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:34 pm If the people are kept ignorant then they will be easier for the church and conservative media to control. Orwell and Huxley saw it coming.
Obama’s economic prosperity plan:

Cash for Clunkers, i.e., Debt

Government prints up a whole bunch of money.
Government buys good, serviceable cars from the population and destroys the engines so they can never be used again.

People then plunk their clunker money down on a new vehicle.

That this economic prosperity plan gets swallowed whole as 4+% economic growth, and gets passed along as fact by geese, is a testimony to the success of the Left's lock on who learns what in school and most importantly, what to think about it. It's also probably an indication of the magic of numbers upon the unthinking.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Nick_A »

This is rather long but useful article for anyone trying to understand the Alinsky influence. I'll quote the beginning:

https://www.newenglishreview.org/DL_Ada ... _Politics/
Saul Alinsky and his "community organizing" methods and philosophy have had a profound influence on the politics of the United States. Recent history would suggest that this influence is just short of catastrophic.
Alinsky's book, "Rules for Radicals," published in 1971 still has enormous effects on our country today. Hillary Clinton wrote her Wellesley College thesis on Alinsky, interviewing him personally for her research. After her graduation Alinsky offered her a job with his organization, which she refused to pursue other opportunities. President Obama worked for Alinsky organizations and taught seminars in Alinsky tactics and methodology during his "community organizing" period in Chicago. Michelle Obama echoed Alinsky’s words in her speech at the Democratic Convention.

Michelle Obama:
“Barack stood up that day,” talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, “and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about “The world as it is” and “The world as it should be…”
And, “All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be.”
Saul Alinsky, “Rules for Radicals,” Chapter 2:
“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive-but real-allies of the Haves … The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means … The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be.“
Alinsky is making a strong case in this quote for the abandonment of morals and ethics as nothing but impediments to political success. For Alinsky, as for Michelle and Barack Hussein Obama, morality and ethics prevent the world from being what “it should be.” The Alinsky end game is likely a global utopia in which the “people” have “power.” Unfortunately, this utopianism has been the foundation of several über-violent movements of the last century which have resulted in over 100 million deaths.

Alinsky’s dedication of “Rules for Radicals” to Lucifer is easily understood; as a champion of amorality and the abandonment of ethics as nothing more than props that sustain the status quo Lucifer is the perfect model of the destroyer for the activist Alinsky. The fact that our top political leadership has embraced this amoral set of tactics for political gain should cause all Americans concern.
There is no utopia; those who have strived to make the impossible real, to implement their grand visions of life have been the agents of death and destruction on a scale surpassed only perhaps by Islam. Alinsky, like the Koran, Sira, and Hadith, represents morality turned upside down or abandoned entirely in favor of cold pragmatism.
Greta wrote:
Trump and his drones would appear to be a conduit for a Zeitgeist based at least in part on physics. The more hot and active an object the more energy is needed to bring it to order. I think the US is on the verge of bringing their governance a step or two towards the style of other giant nations like China and Russia (and India in terms of underhanded dealings). The first step is to shake off governmental accountability bit by bit.
This is typical Alinsky. Community organizing relies on causing the problems Trump is being accused of.

From further into the article:
We live in a time of unprecedented domestic upheaval and not any that has been brought upon us by circumstances or international conflagrations but because our Alinsky-influenced, post-modern leadership believes that conflict and struggle is the path to human evolution.

The Obama administration is the embodiment of the failure of politics because it is not about politics - politics involves concession and compromise - it is about victory at any cost. The American people expected hope and change, as that is what they voted for but what they really wanted was stability and prosperity.
"Thus Alinsky begins his text by telling readers exactly what a radical is. He is not a reformer of the system but its would-be destroyer. In his own mind the radical is building his own kingdom, which to him is a kingdom of heaven on earth. Since a kingdom of heaven built by human beings is a fantasy - and impossible dream- the radical's only real world efforts are those which are aimed at subverting the society he lives in. He is a nihilist.
This is something that conservatives generally have a hard time understanding. As a former radical, I am constantly asked how radicals could hate America and why they would want to destroy a society that compared to others is tolerant, inclusive and open, and treats all people with a dignity and respect that is the envy of the world. The answer to the this question is that radicals are not comparing America to other real world societies. They are comparing America to the heaven on earth - the kingdom of social justice and freedom - they think they are building. And compared to this heaven even America is hell." (Horowitz, pp.16-17, Barack Obama's Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model)

The United States was founded upon the concept that “the people” rule not the elites; that is why there are checks and balances built into our system of government. The Alinsky followers, now that they hold the levers of power, are seeing a popular opposition to their endless agitations. The rise of the Alinskyites has been a rude awakening for most Americans, but it has also energized a vocal opposition.

We must return to our roots, our moral, ethical and legal roots, Constitution and Bill of Rights. We must see ourselves in an historical context which the Harvard and Yale dhimmis in positions of authority will not. Our culture and our country are of great value and are worth protecting and saving. We live in a confused time, but the confusion is clearing away; it is clearing away through knowledge and understanding of the motivations of those in power.
The Alinsky ideology of nihilism and deconstruction must be repudiated. Those who are his sycophants and fellow travelers must be exposed and shamed for waging war on their own country and their own people in the name of Utopianism and endless struggle.

Our purpose is to learn through the slow, but sound, evolutionary process of trial and error, and to preserve the Constitution its sovereignty over this great land. If our leaders do not concur, if they seek to shortcut the natural process or disrupt the rule of law, they must be voted out or impeached..........................
Imagine snowflakes gathered together for the sake of creating heaven on earth through destruction and statist slavery. Unfortunately the young having been inflicted with spirit killing and political indoctrination become what you have seen on TV. They have no conception of the value of striving for freedom

You can appreciate how cold and cruel the Alinsky techniques make people become in service to an agenda once you consider his friendship with Frank Nitti
Alinsky’s self-identification of Frank Nitti the mobster killer as his "professor" is important. In retrospect one can speculate that Alinsky learned a great deal about pressure and intimidation from his friends in the Chicago mob.
But even more enlightening is that the mob killer Nitti is the anti-thesis of what America is about; amorality and criminality were what Alinsky apparently found so fascinating about Nitti and his gang- they beat “the system” which Alinsky saw as just as corrupt or equally so to the Capone/Nitti gangsters.
This abandonment of morality and ethics and in fact, the identification of morality and ethics as impediments, would become a theme with Alinsky. The two years of training with “Professor” Nitti would reap huge rewards for Alinsky over time. But what it has left as a legacy for this country is a disaster as Alinsky’s followers took this abandonment of morals and ethics as a serious lesson; nothing is excluded as far as tactics and strategy are concerned - this is the lesson of the “professor.”
Alinsky's abandonment of morality and ethics is not difficult to demonstrate. "Rules for Radicals" is dedicated to Lucifer, the rebel against God's rule and great destroyer of Christian ideology.
Walker
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Walker »

Lot of good background. Thanks for putting it together.

College level: there’s a lot of good kids and if they’re raised right, that will transcend the secular conditioning.

The safest place for them away from the conditioning is the sciences, but philosophy can still be an elective, and safe is relative when you consider the political agenda driving Global Warming.
User avatar
Greta
Posts: 4389
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:10 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Greta »

I am too stunned by the extraordinary lack of comprehension of my post to reply.

Forget it. I'm so bored with insincere game players like you lot.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by uwot »

Greta wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:34 pm
uwot wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 8:29 pm"Back on topic." Anyway, turns out that Trump's response to the looming threat to the nation's future is to cut education spending by $9 billion. https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budg ... tsheet.pdf
If the people are kept ignorant then they will be easier for the church and conservative media to control. Orwell and Huxley saw it coming.
So did Frank Meyer, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Mey ... ilosopher) You are quite right; American conservatism, as everyone outside America knows, is funded by plutocrats and corporations. What they do is persuade social, traditional and religious conservatives that their interests are only safe in the hands of economic libertarians.
Greta wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:34 pmEducation at this point of development and globalisation is key to future prosperity. However, education for whom?
Ivy League students mostly; the children of plutocrats. They all get to meet one another and are taught how to fleece the hoi polloi.
Greta wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:34 pmI wonder if the humanism that is appropriate for many large societies can work with gigantic populations like in the US? Their society is fragmenting under growing divisions.
It's a two party state. The fusionists have whipped the country into a hysterical frenzy by making it 'us or them'.
Greta wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:34 pmLooking globally and historically, all of the giant populations seem to be built upon a large mass of "proles" - the uneducated poor. Dictatorships and oligarchies. When a society becomes very large it may be inevitable that they develop this disadvantaged rump on which the well-to-do rely just as they once needed farm animals.
Well yeah. When Nixon took the US out of the Gold Standard, one of the effects was that collateral for loans moved from Fort Knox to the population. Literally the collateral for the US national debt (and the UK's for that matter) is the promise that generations of Americans will spend a part of their working week just making the money to pay the descendants of the plutocrats and corporations that own them. Tax is increasingly about paying debt and the economic libertarians are doing everything they can to reduce the tax spent on everything apart from debt, so that they can increase the debt, which means more money for them.
Greta wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:34 pmIf it's happening even in a very rich and advanced society like the US I expect it's inevitable without focused countermeasures.
With any luck America will come to its senses so that we won't see idiots like Hilary Clinton buying into the madness and calling Trump supporters "a basket of deplorables".
Greta wrote: Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:34 pmTrump and his drones would appear to be a conduit for a Zeitgeist based at least in part on physics. The more hot and active an object the more energy is needed to bring it to order. I think the US is on the verge of bringing their governance a step or two towards the style of other giant nations like China and Russia (and India in terms of underhanded dealings). The first step is to shake off governmental accountability bit by bit.
Have a look at how many Americans view government. They're way beyond step one.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by uwot »

Greta wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:30 am I am too stunned by the extraordinary lack of comprehension of my post to reply.

Forget it. I'm so bored with insincere game players like you lot.
Oh. Ok.
Locked