Impenitent wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:16 pm
thinking in language... the monological may have dialogical characteristics, but they are not completely similar
Why not? According to the theory of inner speech, developed by Lev Vygotsky, inner speech is the result of the process of interiorization of a child's egocentric speech, which is completely monological. So, in principle, both kinds of speech have the same nature.
monologically, one understands completely the meanings and definitions of the terms one uses
dialogically, there is a difference of interpretation...
I have never seen the color red through your eyes, nor you through mine...
Impenitent wrote: ↑Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:50 pm
monologically, one understands completely the meanings and definitions of the terms one uses
dialogically, there is a difference of interpretation...
Bakhtin wrote:"An essential (constitutive) maker of the utterance is its quality be addressed to someone, its addressivity. This addressee can be an immediate participator-interlocutor in a dialogue, but it can also be an indefinite, unconcrete other in various kinds of monological utterances."
Basically, any monolog is a dialogue.
Impenitent wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:16 pm
thinking in language... the monological may have dialogical characteristics, but they are not completely similar
Impenitent wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:16 pm
thinking in language... the monological may have dialogical characteristics, but they are not completely similar
So, could you explain and elaborate your point?
I did on 8-27 @ 3:50
the things you sense give you your perceptual definitions
no one else senses exactly as you do through your senses
each instance is unique although they may share similar names