i.e. with too much terminology. One idea is to add a glossary. Another is to have the option of putting the article in another form to make it more readable.
Any comments?
I have no comment. That's the extent of my commitment to commit to a comment.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βWed Aug 15, 2018 8:48 pmI like to be able to read an article that's not too technical,
i.e. with too much terminology. One idea is to add a glossary. Another is to have the option of putting the article in another form to make it more readable.
Any comments?
PhilX
![]()
Pictures? A comic book format?Philosophy Explorer wrote: βWed Aug 15, 2018 8:48 pmI like to be able to read an article that's not too technical,
i.e. with too much terminology. One idea is to add a glossary. Another is to have the option of putting the article in another form to make it more readable.
Any comments?
PhilX
![]()
-1- wrote: βThu Aug 16, 2018 2:12 amI have no comment. That's the extent of my commitment to commit to a comment.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βWed Aug 15, 2018 8:48 pmI like to be able to read an article that's not too technical,
i.e. with too much terminology. One idea is to add a glossary. Another is to have the option of putting the article in another form to make it more readable.
Any comments?
PhilX
![]()
Huh? No comma in the comment? Com', man! a commie?
Call me ant?
Kumquat: (< cumsquat) is that what they call the orgasm of a squaw? (Squaw: used to be a normal, later turned to be a derogatory, and now extinct word for middle-aged female North American aboriginal First Nations person.)Dalek Prime wrote: βWed Aug 29, 2018 11:34 amI can only think of kumquat now.doesn't really fit, does it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests