Failure of "I".
Failure of "I".
"I exist" is an objective statement that exists seperate from the subjective experience of "I".
Discuss.
Discuss.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Failure of "I".
That is an objective statement, as objectivity is the symmetry between subjective statements that negate the subjective nature.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:53 pmBoth statements are subjective, or rather, both the experience and the statement are subjective. External confirmation comes from others.
For example I may see a unicorn. You may not. This "me seeing the unicorn is subject entirely to me". However if you see it also, it becomes an objective perception in the respect it acts as a unified median between the subjective states which effectively change them.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Failure of "I".
It's only objective from another party. Yes. What are you arguing? The self-experience of I is subjective. So is the statement I exist. What is the issue here?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:12 pmThat is an objective statement, as objectivity is the symmetry between subjective statements that negate the subjective nature.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:53 pmBoth statements are subjective, or rather, both the experience and the statement are subjective. External confirmation comes from others.
For example I may see a unicorn. You may not. This "me seeing the unicorn is subject entirely to me". However if you see it also, it becomes an objective perception in the respect it acts as a unified median between the subjective states which effectively change them.
Re: Failure of "I".
"I" is an objective statement, hence the subjective has roots in the objective and vice versa, and the subjective-objective dual nature of the axiom observes a statement of relation between the undefined subjective state and the defined objective state.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:18 pmIt's only objective from another party. Yes. What are you arguing? The self-experience of I is subjective. So is the statement I exist. What is the issue here?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:12 pmThat is an objective statement, as objectivity is the symmetry between subjective statements that negate the subjective nature.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:53 pm
Both statements are subjective, or rather, both the experience and the statement are subjective. External confirmation comes from others.
For example I may see a unicorn. You may not. This "me seeing the unicorn is subject entirely to me". However if you see it also, it becomes an objective perception in the respect it acts as a unified median between the subjective states which effectively change them.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Failure of "I".
I is subjective. It is declared from the I.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:27 pm"I" is an objective statement, hence the subjective has roots in the objective and vice versa, and the subjective-objective dual nature of the axiom observes a statement of relation between the undefined subjective state and the defined objective state.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:18 pmIt's only objective from another party. Yes. What are you arguing? The self-experience of I is subjective. So is the statement I exist. What is the issue here?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:12 pm
That is an objective statement, as objectivity is the symmetry between subjective statements that negate the subjective nature.
For example I may see a unicorn. You may not. This "me seeing the unicorn is subject entirely to me". However if you see it also, it becomes an objective perception in the respect it acts as a unified median between the subjective states which effectively change them.
Re: Failure of "I".
Now it is dually objective.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:39 pmI is subjective. It is from the I.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:27 pm"I" is an objective statement, hence the subjective has roots in the objective and vice versa, and the subjective-objective dual nature of the axiom observes a statement of relation between the undefined subjective state and the defined objective state.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:18 pm
It's only objective from another party. Yes. What are you arguing? The self-experience of I is subjective. So is the statement I exist. What is the issue here?
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Failure of "I".
No. The I's are just crossed, now.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:40 pmNow it is dually objective.
I don't see how you suppose your views to be objective, when I know mine are not, try as i might. Any realist knows that they're views are subject to interpretation, and not objective reality.
Re: Failure of "I".
Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:18 pmIt's only objective from another party. Yes. What are you arguing? The self-experience of I is subjective. So is the statement I exist. What is the issue here?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:12 pmThat is an objective statement, as objectivity is the symmetry between subjective statements that negate the subjective nature.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:53 pm
Both statements are subjective, or rather, both the experience and the statement are subjective. External confirmation comes from others.
For example I may see a unicorn. You may not. This "me seeing the unicorn is subject entirely to me". However if you see it also, it becomes an objective perception in the respect it acts as a unified median between the subjective states which effectively change them.
I exist is a claim of existing...who is making the claim it exists?
.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Failure of "I".
Yeah, still blocked, DAM.
Re: Failure of "I".
Forget about me...
Unblock and see clearly...who is the I making the claim I exist?
-
- Posts: 12590
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am
Re: Failure of "I".
I wonder you understand clearly what is meant to be objective.
Note my point, 'truth' is always conditioned upon a specific Framework and System established [explicitly or impliedly] and agreed by a group of humans.Objectivity is a central philosophical concept, objective means being independent of the perceptions thus objectivity means the property of being independent from the perceptions, which has been variously defined by sources.
Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings.
viewtopic.php?p=368747#p368747
If you state "I exist" is an objective statement, then it is fundamentally subjective, i.e. intersubjective via human [subject] made framework and system.
If you intend to allude to an "I AM" that survives physical death, that "I" independent of empirical human conditions is an illusion.
When you use the term 'exist' as in "I exists" note existence is not a predicate.
Thus "I exists" is meaningless without predicates.
The point is the necessary predicates are taken for granted in conventional communications.
In addition the predicates must be empirically verifiable, e.g. I exists as a person with this and that qualities [verifiable].
"I" exists as a permanent soul that survives physical death is not testable and verifiable, thus illusory.
Re: Failure of "I".
There is no 'you' stating 'I exist'Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:41 amIf you state "I exist" is an objective statement, then it is fundamentally subjective, i.e. intersubjective via human [subject] made framework and system.
'I exist' is the unknown known.
There is no 'you' to know the unknown known. (unclaimed)
You are the unknown known. (unclaimed) (there is no other framework by which the you is known) you are known because you are not known.
Subject and Object are ONE ..in the same instant, namely, now.
One does not come before the other or come after the other. One is indivisible, tis only concepts/language that divides and language is a mental construct an illusion.
One is not an illusion, because one is all there is...which is everything as both the knower internal and the known external.
This one is not in relationship, it only appears to be for the sake of dual communication... but no one is communicating with another, there is only this beginingless source... from source to source an endless spring.
.
.
-
- Posts: 12590
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am
Re: Failure of "I".
Your 'unknown known' is a deception.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:03 amThere is no 'you' stating 'I exist'Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:41 amIf you state "I exist" is an objective statement, then it is fundamentally subjective, i.e. intersubjective via human [subject] made framework and system.
'I exist' is the unknown known.
There is no 'you' to know the unknown known. (unclaimed)
You are the unknown known. (unclaimed) (there is no other framework by which the you is known) you are known because you are not known.
Subject and Object are ONE ..in the same instant, namely, now.
One does not come before the other or come after the other. One is indivisible, tis only concepts/language that divides and language is a mental construct an illusion.
One is not an illusion, because one is all there is...which is everything as both the knower internal and the known external.
This one is not in relationship, it only appears to be for the sake of dual communication... but no one is communicating with another, there is only this beginingless source... from source to source an endless spring.