That you think that better than the NS.
The Celts were long gone by the time the Anglo-Saxons arrived. When they did arrive they landed into a place culturally, racially, spiritually and linguistically just like home, (bolding mine):
And yet we still find Celts in the South and the Anglo-Saxon genetic compliment not more than 40%?
"The orthodox view is that the entire population of the British Isles, including England, was Celtic-speaking when Caesar invaded. But if that were the case, a modest Anglo-Saxon invasion is unlikely to have swept away all traces of Celtic language from the pre-existing population of England. Yet there are only half a dozen Celtic words in English, the rest being mainly Germanic, Norman or medieval Latin. One explanation is that England was not mainly Celtic-speaking before the Anglo-Saxons. Consider, for example, the near-total absence of Celtic inscriptions in England (outside Cornwall), although they are abundant in Ireland, Wales, Scotland and Brittany. ...
So you think the Celts magically teleported to Wales and Scotland? No idea what Brittany has to do with this.
Who was here when the Romans came?
Celts and look like some early Germans.
Who then moved where?
So who were the Britons inhabiting England at the time of the Roman invasion? The history of pre-Roman coins in southern Britain reveals an influence from Belgic Gaul. The tribes of England south of the Thames and along the south coast during Caesar's time all had Belgic names or affiliations. Caesar tells us that these large intrusive settlements had replaced an earlier British population, which had retreated to the hinterland of southeast England. The latter may have been the large Celtic tribe, the Catuvellauni, situated in the home counties north of the Thames. Tacitus reported that between Britain and Gaul "the language differs but little." ...
The common language referred to by Tacitus was probably not Celtic, but was similar to that spoken by the Belgae, who may have been a Germanic people, as implied by Caesar. In other words, a Germanic-type language could already have been indigenous to England at the time of the Roman invasion. In support of this inference, there is some recent lexical (vocabulary) evidence analysed by Cambridge geneticist Peter Forster and continental colleagues. They found that the date of the split between old English and continental Germanic languages goes much further back than the dark ages, and that English may have been a separate, fourth branch of the Germanic language before the Roman invasion.
Apart from the Belgian connection in the south, my analysis of the genetic evidence also shows that there were major Scandinavian incursions into northern and eastern Britain, from Shetland to Anglia, during the Neolithic period and before the Romans. These are consistent with the intense cultural interchanges across the North sea during the Neolithic and bronze age. Early Anglian dialects, such as found in the old English saga Beowulf, owe much of their vocabulary to Scandinavian languages."
You got any links to the actual papers as I slightly worry about the academic integrity someone who uses the terms "genetic blood-brothers" together.
Because they are tightly bundled.
Well dur! Who's arguing that a cultural identity doesn't involve such things? Your theme is that this is all to do with race and genetics and so far you have shown nothing that shows such a causative link.
How many children must be blown up by hostile foreigners so you can keep putting on a sham show of your virtue and name-calling others?
I don't know, when are you Yanks likely to stop doing it? As at an approximate count you've been responsible for the death of at least a million kiddies in the last few decades with your blundering.
Are you saying you're not promoting the neo-nazi white supremacist agenda? That you are not a racialist?
You must feel so big. ...
Save your pouting for the social networks.
From the New Scientist article we've been reading, Coghlan (2015), "The team found that the genetic profiles of the participants formed ... distinct clusters. When they mapped this information based on where the participants lived they were surprised to see the clusters mapped almost exactly to geographical location." Race and language correlate powerfully, it is no mere coincidence. ...
Unless you can find a causative link a 'mere coincidence is exactly what a correlation means in this case.
Race, language, culture and spirituality are tightly bundled and only under very particular circumstances can they be unraveled. ...
Dur! Culture in the main is the mix of 'race', language and religion and you can add geography to that as well but they can morph into another culture based upon Idea.
This is the exact wrong approach to the problem of hostile aliens in our homelands: ...
Whose 'homeland'? As you are a septic tank are you not?
"Furthermore, British government has to cope with the ... that British government is trying its best to manage and improve this ... are for British government simpler way of handling with ..." etc etc, Helanová (2011) Integration of Muslims in Great Britain, p.47.
There is no government failure, there is no problem of intolerance, or failures of multiculturalism. Peoples do not give up their identities, instead they maintain them across thousands of years. ...
From your paper you numbnut,
"Furthermore, British government has to cope with the by-product of multiculturalism segregated communities, as this discourse was supporting social and cultural diversity rather than integrity."
"When scrutinized in detail, the problem lies primarily in the insufficient communication between British government, local officers and Muslim communities. Due to this gap in communication, government has no exact information about what are young Muslims taught by their Imams in mosques, about housing conditions, or religious discrimination that Muslims still have to face. "
"Although it might seem that Muslims are unable to integrate into western societies, Muslims in the United Kingdom nowadays creates an integral part of this country"
Anyway, go on believing how virtuous you are and how much superior you are to those you call nazis and racists while your people become a minority in their own land, you lose political control of your own country, and every week more and more men and women and children are blown up and run over and hacked to death.
Then the perpetrators will be arrested and tried and imprisoned as the criminals they are, much as we did with the American sponsored Irish terrorists.
I have not called you a Nazi, I say you are promoting the far-right's white supremacist neo-nazi agenda.
I have not called you a racist, I say you are a racialist. Do you deny these things?
We'll deal with the issues in our country for ourselves and one of the first things should be to deal with the imported Yank abomination "multiculturalism", what we don't need is numbnut Yanks butting their noses in and making things worse thanks. Tweet that to your POTUS would you.