I'm sorry, but those ignorant sloths have never read the book of Revelation or "The Ouzo Prophecy."Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm The interpretations of the Bible are legion. Other Christian Theists do not accept much of the Bible as anything to do with God's message at all.
How God could fail to convey His message?
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Last edited by bobevenson on Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
I don't expect you to nor do I ask you to. I'm just telling you what I know.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm As for YOUR view of god? Why should I think that is nay better than any go the others.
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
But that's what you don't understand. God doesn't wish for us to be able to understand all of him, or if he does, he wants those who really seek the understanding to be the ones to find it. What's the point of just giving us the knowledge beforehand? There'd be nothing for us to do whole we're here!Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:46 pm You might also want to consider the possibility that if you think god (whatever the fuck that is) created humanity then humanity's failure is god's failure to create a being capable of reading god.
Gko cannot fail at creating anything as that is in the definition of who he is. In this context, he has chosen not to give us all the answers despite that fact.
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
God and Allah were created by Man in His own image. That is why the Abrahamic deities are entirely focused on human morality.
Any universal entity is not going to have the slightest interest in human morals, which are merely the ever-evolving rules of engagement adopted by intelligent social species. It's not as though we judge the performance of our bodies' microbes. As professionals we trust each other to do our jobs :)
Any universal entity is not going to have the slightest interest in human morals, which are merely the ever-evolving rules of engagement adopted by intelligent social species. It's not as though we judge the performance of our bodies' microbes. As professionals we trust each other to do our jobs :)
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Idiot!bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:32 pmI'm sorry, but those ignorant sloths have never read the book of Revelation or "The Ouzo Prophecy."Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm The interpretations of the Bible are legion. Other Christian Theists do not accept much of the Bible as anything to do with God's message at all.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
You "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.thedoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:37 pmI don't expect you to nor do I ask you to. I'm just telling you what I know.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm As for YOUR view of god? Why should I think that is nay better than any go the others.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Yet another moron on the site that can read the mind of God!!!Vendetta wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:08 amBut that's what you don't understand. God doesn't wish for us to be able to understand all of him, or if he does, he wants those who really seek the understanding to be the ones to find it. What's the point of just giving us the knowledge beforehand? There'd be nothing for us to do whole we're here!Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:46 pm You might also want to consider the possibility that if you think god (whatever the fuck that is) created humanity then humanity's failure is god's failure to create a being capable of reading god.
Gko cannot fail at creating anything as that is in the definition of who he is. In this context, he has chosen not to give us all the answers despite that fact.
You are not only a fool, you are an arrogant fool.

“And do you think that unto such as you
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”
― Omar Khayyám, Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Just because you don't know it, doesn't mean that I or someone else doesn't know it. It's similar to the Argument from incredulity.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:29 pmYou "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.thedoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:37 pmI don't expect you to nor do I ask you to. I'm just telling you what I know.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm As for YOUR view of god? Why should I think that is nay better than any go the others.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Knowing is based on evidence. You know shit.thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:08 pmJust because you don't know it, doesn't mean that I or someone else doesn't know it. It's similar to the Argument from incredulity.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:29 pmYou "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Delusions are based on a lack of evidence, so what I know is not a delusion.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:42 pmKnowing is based on evidence. You know shit.thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:08 pmJust because you don't know it, doesn't mean that I or someone else doesn't know it. It's similar to the Argument from incredulity.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:29 pm
You "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
I have evidence that you are in fact deluded.thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:29 pmDelusions are based on a lack of evidence, so what I know is not a delusion.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:42 pmKnowing is based on evidence. You know shit.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.
You believe in god a thing for which you can have no evidence; a thing for which you can produce no evidence.
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
God is the light in which I see.
Aka No..thing and everything.
Aka No..thing and everything.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 10653
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Provide YOUR evidence that there is no God.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:16 pmI have evidence that you are in fact deluded.thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:29 pmDelusions are based on a lack of evidence, so what I know is not a delusion.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:42 pm
Knowing is based on evidence. You know shit.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.
The thing is - God will provide evidence on a personal level to individuals that had some FAITH. Atheists that run around like headless chickens asking for evidence from those that do KNOW it exists should actually comprehend a thing called FAITH, which was simply asked of us from the outset. Atheists will never be given the evidence.Hobbes' Choice wrote:You believe in god a thing for which you can have no evidence; a thing for which you can produce no evidence.
I have provided far more evidence of God than you could ever muster for a contrary argument.
We are PUPILS of the light (apart from the atheists)
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
No evidence is needed to prove something does not exist.
Re: How God could fail to convey His message?
Absolutely there is! Just because you specifically haven't interacted with something or don't believe in it doesn't mean it does not exist. I'm sure there are hundreds of thousands of people that you've never met, but if you were to say that because of that, they don't exist, does that make them not exist? You'd need proof.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2017 12:03 pmNo evidence is needed to prove something does not exist.