Referring to a "transcendent cause" when nothing of the like was said or implied is typical of the mental contortions necessary in order to avoid the full implications of non-locality. There is only one, undivided act and recent experiments have reduced the number of possible "hidden variables" to one.Obvious Leo wrote:Yes. Our notions of locality can only to be applied to phenomena and are thus purely observer-defined constructs, but I can't see how this conclusion leads to your assumption of transcendent cause. Perhaps you could flesh out the logic steps which lead you there.
If mind exists locally, then it exists non-locally. It's that simple. The observer-defined constructs are the perceived average of individual minds linked by a spacetime-transcending "overmind." This explains why an "objective" reality exists at all. It's this, or solipism. Your choice.