Ah! Now that you've reinstated meaning for yourself I can hear you.
Moyo wrote:#2_yr_olds
Is this some juvenile jargon?
The fact that "cognito ergo ergo sum" means there is meaning. ...
Does it? Well "cognito ergo ergo sum" is a meaningless statement upon a philosophy forum. You might wish to read a guy called Descartes as so far you have reintroduced meaning upon a falsehood.
The fact that the axiom of identity is violated and not at the same time makes it irrational to qustion the existance of god. ...
Still not sure you have proved that the philosophically logical statement that A is A can be violated but you've probably raised an issue about how 'is' is not correctly interpreted by '=' but if what you say is true then you've also proved that it is irrational to raise the existence of 'god'. Good for you, about time we stopped yakking on about 'It'.
Existence is a miracle.
Which one? Yours, the universe, the platypus. But I have no doubt it is all quite amazing.
See this,
Moyo wrote:Since the axiom of identity is invalid no thing aor statement is meaningful. ...
and this?
The fact that "cognito ergo ergo sum" means there is meaning. ...
This is known as a logical contradiction in Philosophy.
How will you resolve it?