different way of understanding grammer.

What did you say? And what did you mean by it?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Lev Muishkin
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 11:21 pm

Re: different way of understanding grammer.

Post by Lev Muishkin »

Wyman wrote:
Sorry, VT always just puts me in a bad mood.

Interest was charged for post war loans, but no money was made on lend lease, most of it wasn't returned and most of that debt forgiven. I always thought the U.S. was neutral by law and lend lease was a legal way to get around the neutrality acts by those, like FDR, who were sympathetic to the U.K.. Saying that it was a way to make money, as someone posted, is a bit of a stretch, even for the staunchest anti-american.

I would never say the U.K. owes a debt out of WWII as they were the only thing between total victory for Hitler from 1939 to 1941, so I see where that would piss you off.
The British paid back every red cent. It was a drain on the economy for at least 20 years, whilst US business enacted the Marshal Plan to pay it all the the Krauts.
The US benefitted the most and lost the least compared to the main players.

BTW. Where did you get that surname?
Post Reply