I did not mean to imply that "on the grounds that knowledge claims are foolish." Some knowledge caim s are more stupid than others.mickthinks wrote:This would have been reasonable if you had stopped there, chaz, but you went further than not accepting. You actually denied the claim as if you knew it were false. In other words, you made a competing knowledge claim, and you made it on the grounds that knowledge claims are foolish.chaz wyman wrote:I feel under no obligation to accept your claim of knowledge, though I acknowledge your claim for belief.
Now I think everyone else here can see how foolish that was of you, but you need it to be spelt out. No surprise there ...
But you are right, I did not stop there, I also said;"For example I know you are a 4' 1" dwarf."
Only a moron would think that "For example I know you are a 4' 1" dwarf.", was a knowledge claim meant without irony.
So, tell me, what kind of moron are you?