Feminism

[mtmynd1]

You are such an immensely interesting person, sadder. I would think Rick Lewis would grab you up and publish your philosophies in his magazine! That's why you're here isn't, fool? To put on your philosophical diapers and whine about the intelligence on this board.

Where is your originality? You are so bloated with others words and ideas that you've lost your own individuality. The obesity of your mind so overfilled with nonsense and distortions you fart and think it's a grand idea that everyone should embrace, when in the reality of things you simply are a buffoon desperately seeking an audience. Go feed the little minds on your own site. They anxiously await your words...

[Satyr]

Wow...getting published in this day and age is so easy that anyone who still thinks it is the measure of validity must be a moron still dependent on the appreciation of others.
Retard, we live in an age of information overload; any Dick can publish himself at any time on any subject.

Being marketable is not a sign of quality, you imbecile.
They've been selling garbage to morons like you for centuries.

Look as Harry Potter.
The most popular book ever...is it quality?
Is it profound?
Look at Christianity, the bible...they've been selling that crap for thousands of years, to cowardly, gulligle, genetic feces, like you.

Are you a moron?
Don't bother...you've already answered.

[andy_12]

how about instead of being a feminist people choose to be a humanist.

[Satyr]

Men, Women, and Intelligence

Are Women Superior to Men?

[Atthet]

Good or Bad?

Great for Jewish women, good for black and white women, good for Jewish men, bad for everybody else including black and white men.

Constructive Destructive?

Culturally constructive, the alleviation of social pressures for white males, creates an incentive for reassertion and reconstruction of wide cultural values.

Economically stagnant, adding women to the workforce decreases inter-male competition. Capitalism becomes reduced, communistic and socialistic economic policies become necessary.

Socially destructive, adding women to the workforce destroys the need for traditional notions of family, derived from patriarchal Christian traditions, social mores, and dogma. The Christian faith is decreased, deconstructed, demeaned, ridiculed, and becomes obsolete, giving rise to "new age" cultural groups, including Neo-paganism, a resurgence of ancient European values.

What are the roots of feminist dogma and what are its aspirations?

Feminism is mostly a Judaic ideology which overturns or "inverts" both Christian and Islamic ideals of patriarchy. Jews posit that God is "female" or gender-neutral, which goes against Christian and Islamic ideals of godhood. Judaism is a feminine ideology which displaces masculine elements of Christian and Islamic culture. The reappearance and expanding borders of Israel reflects the increasing strength and popularity of Judaic ideologies, including feminism as its number one global cultural influence.

How can it be integrated within a general western decline and within the all-leveling, materialistic, hedonistic Modernity, producing mindlessness and entitlement?

Feminism seeks to displace male power with female power. One of its primary propaganda points is "equal pay for equal labor". Women are first introduced, and pushed into the workforce, leaving the home empty. This is anti-Christian and anti-patriarchy. The results are an immediate withdrawal of "family values". This becomes a social trend. Families are replaced with hedonistic, "pop" culture, and liberal views regarding sexuality. Abortions increase, "free sex" is tolerated and even encouraged to children as young as kindergarten.

The problem with equal pay for equal labor, is this presumes a false history of labor movements. Women already have a sexual power that compensates for dependency on a male's income. In other words, if a woman does not work, and focuses on using her female guile and sexual allure, then she is not disadvantaged. If you add an income "equal" with men, on top of female sexual power, then males in society and civilization become displaced.
The result is a matriarchy, propelled to higher lengths by the strength of Judaic social elements.

Can feminism be traced back to natural phenomena or is it a total disconnect with nature, a logical outcome of sheltering social systems which usurp natural balances, annighilating them, and replacing them with human constructs concerning justice, fairness, equality, utopian paradises?

I believe that all phenomena are ultimately, natural. An increase in female power, female sexuality enhanced by an "equal" male payroll, coming from first world economies, pushes women to new heights of power. However, what is the result? Given absolute "freedom" for women, women are still not producers, innovators, creators, inspirational leaders, cultural leaders, or even political leaders, although there may be a surge in female political leaders. What does this mean?

It means that females, as a gender, are beholden to their ideology, and not challengers to it. This has a systemic social effect, that creates stagnancy. This stagnancy can be applied to art, innovation, economy, war, what liberals call "progress", or any other area. A strong female matriarchy results in stagnation throughout society. Society does not necessarily collapse, but it does come to grinding halt in anything that can be called "progress". Female participation in the sciences is one of the worst things that can happen to Western societies. Women should become excluded from areas of science, art, and philosophy, not because they are a "threat", but precisely because women are a distraction and hinderance to masculine creativity.

If appearances do not matter then why does man use them to determine essence and to categorize reality?

Appearance does matter, but Judeo-Christian institutions, education, society, and culture have false premises regarding appearance. Christians, for example, are instructed that "Only God can judge!" This means that Christians strictly rely on established, traditional "authorities". For Jews, this authority is called "science", secular humanisms, and their positions are called psychiatrists and scientists.
A priest is to a Christian, as a psychiatrist is to a Jew.
A monk is to a Christian, as a scientist is to a Jew.

Secular Humanism is the "sharing" of western civilization, between dominant elements of Judaic and Christian ideology, and theology.

If only humans are exempt from aesthetic judgments then why is this so?

Secular Humanism necessitates that the slave classes cannot use any form of "judgment", and must instead rely on established authorities, who represent the dogma of Judeo-Christian institutions.

Why do some characteristics matter whereas others are trivial?

Selective Reasoning
Compartmentalization

A white liberal female will voice that she is "against racism", but when a black male makes sexual advances toward her, the truth is revealed. She discriminates hypocritically. This lie, this hypocrisy, is a very strong aspect of liberal ideology. It is an ideology not beholden to any "truth", making it an apparent idealism, in line with other cultural elements.

If environments only affect the body - let's take Cartesian dualism as a given here - and not the mind, then how does intelligence and consciousness evolve?

How does enforcing a strict code of social behavior support the illusion of parity?

Does protecting the week, the diseased, the simple, lead to genetic health or do the genes that produce these inferiority get propagated within a gene pool resting in a general decline technologies are then asked to correct", in a spiraling decline due to allocation of resources?
Do human interactions upon natural processes only result in material and/or environmental pollution or can there also be genetic and mimetic pollution?

Genetic culling will occur eventually, with or without human intervention. Eugenics is already applied in western culture through systemic abortion, and promotion of abortion as a form of contraception. The "planned parenthood" corporation, a Eugenics world leader, is dominated by feminists with Judaic underpinnings.
Mostly blacks in the United States are targeted and affected by abortion. Black babies in the U.S. are aborted in the millions. In China, abortion has no moral restriction. It is mostly Christian fundamentalism that prevents and resists full scale acceptance of abortion as a means of population control.

Further technologies and human evolution will inevitably result in more sophisticated and effective means of population control. However, the genetic feces of the world are fearful of these concepts, as they should be. Mostly, these topics reduce to petty emotional responses, fear of occultism, conspiracy theory, which are all misplaced. The main mistake, is the failure of people on philosophy forums to understand nature, compared to civilization as an artifice of man.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Good or Bad?

Great for Jewish women, good for black and white women, good for Jewish men, bad for everybody else including black and white men.

Constructive Destructive?

Culturally constructive, the alleviation of social pressures for white males, creates an incentive for reassertion and reconstruction of wide cultural values.

Economically stagnant, adding women to the workforce decreases inter-male competition. Capitalism becomes reduced, communistic and socialistic economic policies become necessary.

Socially destructive, adding women to the workforce destroys the need for traditional notions of family, derived from patriarchal Christian traditions, social mores, and dogma. The Christian faith is decreased, deconstructed, demeaned, ridiculed, and becomes obsolete, giving rise to "new age" cultural groups, including Neo-paganism, a resurgence of ancient European values.

What are the roots of feminist dogma and what are its aspirations?

Feminism is mostly a Judaic ideology which overturns or "inverts" both Christian and Islamic ideals of patriarchy. Jews posit that God is "female" or gender-neutral, which goes against Christian and Islamic ideals of godhood. Judaism is a feminine ideology which displaces masculine elements of Christian and Islamic culture. The reappearance and expanding borders of Israel reflects the increasing strength and popularity of Judaic ideologies, including feminism as its number one global cultural influence.

How can it be integrated within a general western decline and within the all-leveling, materialistic, hedonistic Modernity, producing mindlessness and entitlement?

Feminism seeks to displace male power with female power. One of its primary propaganda points is "equal pay for equal labor". Women are first introduced, and pushed into the workforce, leaving the home empty. This is anti-Christian and anti-patriarchy. The results are an immediate withdrawal of "family values". This becomes a social trend. Families are replaced with hedonistic, "pop" culture, and liberal views regarding sexuality. Abortions increase, "free sex" is tolerated and even encouraged to children as young as kindergarten.

The problem with equal pay for equal labor, is this presumes a false history of labor movements. Women already have a sexual power that compensates for dependency on a male's income. In other words, if a woman does not work, and focuses on using her female guile and sexual allure, then she is not disadvantaged. If you add an income "equal" with men, on top of female sexual power, then males in society and civilization become displaced.
The result is a matriarchy, propelled to higher lengths by the strength of Judaic social elements.

Can feminism be traced back to natural phenomena or is it a total disconnect with nature, a logical outcome of sheltering social systems which usurp natural balances, annighilating them, and replacing them with human constructs concerning justice, fairness, equality, utopian paradises?

I believe that all phenomena are ultimately, natural. An increase in female power, female sexuality enhanced by an "equal" male payroll, coming from first world economies, pushes women to new heights of power. However, what is the result? Given absolute "freedom" for women, women are still not producers, innovators, creators, inspirational leaders, cultural leaders, or even political leaders, although there may be a surge in female political leaders. What does this mean?

It means that females, as a gender, are beholden to their ideology, and not challengers to it. This has a systemic social effect, that creates stagnancy. This stagnancy can be applied to art, innovation, economy, war, what liberals call "progress", or any other area. A strong female matriarchy results in stagnation throughout society. Society does not necessarily collapse, but it does come to grinding halt in anything that can be called "progress". Female participation in the sciences is one of the worst things that can happen to Western societies. Women should become excluded from areas of science, art, and philosophy, not because they are a "threat", but precisely because women are a distraction and hinderance to masculine creativity.

If appearances do not matter then why does man use them to determine essence and to categorize reality?

Appearance does matter, but Judeo-Christian institutions, education, society, and culture have false premises regarding appearance. Christians, for example, are instructed that "Only God can judge!" This means that Christians strictly rely on established, traditional "authorities". For Jews, this authority is called "science", secular humanisms, and their positions are called psychiatrists and scientists.
A priest is to a Christian, as a psychiatrist is to a Jew.
A monk is to a Christian, as a scientist is to a Jew.

Secular Humanism is the "sharing" of western civilization, between dominant elements of Judaic and Christian ideology, and theology.

If only humans are exempt from aesthetic judgments then why is this so?

Secular Humanism necessitates that the slave classes cannot use any form of "judgment", and must instead rely on established authorities, who represent the dogma of Judeo-Christian institutions.

Why do some characteristics matter whereas others are trivial?

Selective Reasoning
Compartmentalization

A white liberal female will voice that she is "against racism", but when a black male makes sexual advances toward her, the truth is revealed. She discriminates hypocritically. This lie, this hypocrisy, is a very strong aspect of liberal ideology. It is an ideology not beholden to any "truth", making it an apparent idealism, in line with other cultural elements.

If environments only affect the body - let's take Cartesian dualism as a given here - and not the mind, then how does intelligence and consciousness evolve?

How does enforcing a strict code of social behavior support the illusion of parity?

Does protecting the week, the diseased, the simple, lead to genetic health or do the genes that produce these inferiority get propagated within a gene pool resting in a general decline technologies are then asked to correct", in a spiraling decline due to allocation of resources?
Do human interactions upon natural processes only result in material and/or environmental pollution or can there also be genetic and mimetic pollution?

Genetic culling will occur eventually, with or without human intervention. Eugenics is already applied in western culture through systemic abortion, and promotion of abortion as a form of contraception. The "planned parenthood" corporation, a Eugenics world leader, is dominated by feminists with Judaic underpinnings.
Mostly blacks in the United States are targeted and affected by abortion. Black babies in the U.S. are aborted in the millions. In China, abortion has no moral restriction. It is mostly Christian fundamentalism that prevents and resists full scale acceptance of abortion as a means of population control.

Further technologies and human evolution will inevitably result in more sophisticated and effective means of population control. However, the genetic feces of the world are fearful of these concepts, as they should be. Mostly, these topics reduce to petty emotional responses, fear of occultism, conspiracy theory, which are all misplaced. The main mistake, is the failure of people on philosophy forums to understand nature, compared to civilization as an artifice of man.

You certainly make Judaism sound good. I might even convert.

[Satyr]

Woman, you are part of the choir.

[Atthet]

Yes, veggy, to repeat after Satyr, you are already converted. There's nothing more you need to do, slave. My kind is the pagan kind, who rejects completely your Judeo-Christian institutions. All of your morals, ethics, laws, religions, superstitions, does not apply to my type.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Yes, veggy, to repeat after Satyr, you are already converted. There's nothing more you need to do, slave. My kind is the pagan kind, who rejects completely your Judeo-Christian institutions. All of your morals, ethics, laws, religions, superstitions, does not apply to my type.

You shouldn't lump Judaism and Christianity together. They are polar opposites.

[Atthet]

You shouldn't lump Judaism and Christianity together. They are polar opposites.

Is this the lie you live with? So be it.

[Satyr]

Wow...Christianity is the "polar opposite" of Judaism....amazing



That would make Christianity, life-embracing, polytheistic, nature loving, not guilt ridden, not ashamed or embarrassed or teaching a hatred of self, not promising other-world benefits to worldly sacrifices, not preaching a submission to a "higher authority", not claiming to believe in the "true" God, not self-effacing, not claiming a monopoly on salvation, not nihilistic, not dismissive of the real, not placing man on a pedestal of exclusivity, not offering entrance into God's good graces through its dogma, not raising the meek to power and lowering the powerful to meekness.

That would also make Jesus not Jewish.

And also Communism is totally lacking of the same ethos...just as is humanism and modernity and liberalism.
There is no common ground here.

Totally opposites.
Polar opposites...Ying and Yang.

In fact, when the Jewish spiritual paradigm came into contact with Platonism and the Hellenic cosmopolitanism, the earlier Judaic exclusivity did not morph into a more contagious universalism....that eventually resulted in Marxism (was Marx Jewish?), and then in the counter-genes Liberalism, culminating in the romantic Idealism of the Venus Project.

No link whatsoever.

[Arising_uk]

Meritocracy, Twat, would involve no rules imposed from the outside.

Where's this 'outside' you talk about with respect to social issues? But I agree, it would take those with merit to establish such structures as to assist equality of opportunity for some of our citizens to prove their merit.

Every time they hire a twat, like you, or a n*****, to meet a quota that says: "We are politically-correct and we do not discriminate."

I told you, we don't have such things over here. Do you mean the equality acts with respect to interviews that try to decrease obvious bigotry and prejudice when it comes to employing others that can do the job?

Twat, I.Q. tests were meant to offer evidence of parity; they failed at that.

Where they? I thought them first started by the military to quickly sort men to the tasks that suited them.

Even a monkey can be taught to pass I.Q. tests....well the more easiest basic ones.

I thought there no 'pass' in the IQ test? Its a continuum result set.

How long did it take Koreans, Japanese, Chinese, Italians, Greeks,?
Huh twat?

You think Koreans, Japanese, Chinese different races? You think the Italians and Greeks are?
Quite a long time for both groups I think.

It's been a century of whining and bitching...how long before the tests become so easy that even a twat can pass them and claim equality?

No idea what you burble on about?

Having to bow low and hold your tongue and tip-toe around fragile liberalism so as to not draw attention and not cause a stir and not get black-balled.

If you mean the work situation you describe then I just think you the fool to not withhold your assistance and wait to see if they get fired.

Na, just joking Twat...greatness cannot be inhibited. It adapts.
I explore the environmental conditions to be adapted to....'cause I am great.

Then it appears a very different 'greatness' than the one you proclaim?

He who controls history and writes the books controls the consciousness of generations.

It's either that you are a stupid twat or you are too much of a coward to think for yourself.
Twat, you already know what the difference between a great civilization and niggers rubbing sticks around a hut, dancing like monkeys around the fire, and exchanging clay and stone statuettes is.

Many things, law, domestication, irrigation, architecture, etc. You think the Egyptians came from nowhere? I guess you think the Greeks didn't meet the Babylonians.

But you are a retard so I'll have to help you along:
Genius: a term expressing a value judgment based no comparisons. It's standard is determined by time.
The timelessness of a genius is what differentiates him from a simpleton; a genius is not restricted by culture, social conventions, his own mortality, because he draws inspiration from a past beyond the "official doctrine" (memory being a decisive factor in the creation of genius), nor is a genius restricted by the unknown, as he can project (imagine) far beyond the capacity of the average simpleton.
In short a genius, a more sophisticated mind, draws from a more precise understanding of the past, as for him the past is not a simple abstraction he recites like a poem, but he lives it in his bones, and then successfully projects this past, by finding patterns in it, towards a future by using a more accurate and realistic imagination.
The works of greatness hold true far into the future whereas the simpleton only matters within the limits of his short lifespan and is quickly forgotten.

Now the genius of civilizations is also applicable here, for from the organic the Super-organic is birthed, just as form the cell the organism is mammal is born.

Whats all this 'organic' 'super organic' stuff?

You don't think with time the majority of civilizations will be forgotten as they actually were?

Twat, reread what I said: REVOLUTIONIZED, not contributed, participated with her husband, added to, mixed a few beakers...REVOLUTIONIZED, you stupid twat.

Yeah! Thats why she was on the front row at Slovay, your geniuses thought her bottle washing skills needed acclamation.

I read what you said but such a comparison ignores context but then that is the point of you is it not. To find in what you read only confirmation for your cultural bubble.

Revolutions can be small and the ones you think about are very far and few between and the opportunity of them arising so rare that its ridiculous to dismiss who or where such a thing may next happen. That black men are making scientific discoveries and innovations puts the bullshit to your ideas.

Find me the n***** who invented Peanut-Butter and set him next to Graham Bell or Elbert Einstein, you stupid twat.
Find me some painter to match Michelangelo or place next to Beethoven, Britney Spears.

I think some of the old Chinese and Japanese paintings and calligraphy stand the test.

Did you even bother to read the list? Rocket scientists and chemists so mucho fast peanut jelly.

Bakers abound, Twat, following with precision and carefully measured steps the methodology...who is a creative chef?

Well not a baker? Whats the baker who produces a new loaf?

You females have been "stuck" in the kitchen, you say, and still you cannot produce a revolutionary chef.

Did I? I just said that people should be paid the same for doing the same job. Let me think, who wasn't allowed to be a professional chef for how long? Most professional chefs have nicked their mothers skills, otherwise they pretty much learn of the recipes by rote, much like a baker.

Who said anything about taking away or killing or doing violence, you stupid ****?

Where did I loon? I said should we be concentrating upon educating the brighter orientals and asians rather than wasting it upon the lesser whites.

If I say an ape is not as smart as a human, you excluded, am I saying we should take away the jungle form them, or that they should be made extinct?

Are they of any use?

Twat, why does stating a fact about nature, about life, scare you so?

It doesn't. Why does applying it to all bother you?

The Indians and the Europeans are genetically and culturally closer than Europeans and any other group.

But the Europeans are not quite as bright so maybe their culture is the better.

But Twat...why do you think only Intelligence suffices?

Where do I think this? I think 'intelligence' a fairly undefined term at present. Other that not doing the same thing when it doesn't work.

Have you not come across scientists who believe in God and follow Jesus?

More than the average punter.

Twat, intelligence is but a part of it.

Part of what?

Twat, you claimed Niggers were soft and calm and docile, and I retorted with: "Have you seen the statistics on prisons"?

I did not claim that. I claimed that there are recent past events that put the lie to the racists claims, at the times, that the black man was inherently vengeful and violent.

Twat, poverty is part of life...and so is criminality...and so is being caught
Twat is poverty also accidental?

Well its fairly circumstantial as is being born rich.

I was born poor.
Haven't been in prison yet.

You and the majority of black people.

All you have are excuses for historical fact, twat.
Dominance is not accidental, twat...not a mater of a dice role.

'Historical fact' given what you've said about he who controls the past.

Twat, name one n***** philosopher worth reading and that wrote something other than about race.

What straw-men you do raise. I'd have thought you'd have agreed with the Nation of Islam but Malcolm X and Martin Luther King showed the humanity of the American black man. Shame the 'white' is not so magnanimous.

Name one female one who said something worth reading not dealing with gender or sex.

Boden is pretty good as is Pat Churchland.

Twat, slavery was around for centuries before the Niggers themselves hunted down and sold other Niggers to the dreaded white-devil.

You forget the Arab. What this has to do with why slavery was abandoned as an institution in the 'West' I have no idea.

What nation uses it to excuse itself?

What nation is doing this?

What does it matter if I advocate slavery or not, Twat?

It'd give context to your thoughts.

Do you not advocate slavery when you wish to be a slave equally appreciated by the institution?

Where do I advocate this? You're talking to your voices again.

The only one whining and begging for "justice" is you, Twat.

Where do I beg for 'justice'? I support a narrow nationalist view that wants to make full use of resources.

I already have my solution.

Pray tell?

Why would I change a thing? Change would force me to adapt, again.

So once again not a man of Will and Word but just another blinker.

I'm not leading a revolution, moron.

And yet gnu you wish to be.

I'm throwing life-jackets into the sea...and enjoying watching imbeciles, like you, flailing about and slowly drowning.

You think yourself a saviour of some kind? Gnu I name thee!

Are you a communist, Twat?

Nope, old fashioned British Liberal.

Am I?

Apparently so.

So I am a racist, a sexist, and now, also an anti-Semite?
I'm just everything you are not.
I love your easy labels.
I wear them with pride.

Not my labels but what you claim for yourself I'd have thought, why so shy? You do appear everything I'm not, as I'd not capitulate in my work environment like you say you do and I'd not be afraid to tell others what I think of them.

Is that what they all appear to like, twat?
Was it only amongst the upper-classes where these indulgences took hold?
Could their sexual decadence be a symptom of their decline?

I'd have thought these 'upper-classes' the epitome of your ancestry idea, as such why did they decline? But the masses appeared to enjoy the indulgences.

Pedophiles, no, Twat...ephevophiles...and with no penetration.
They looked down on a man who enjoyed being penetrated.
But you keep reading the official doctrine and you'll be a good twat.

Oh! The little tales one tells oneself. But as if I was a Freudian I'd wonder why you thought of those being penetrated and their enjoyment and not those who did the act? As I assume they didn't look down upon those as it appeared fairly common practice.

In other words, twat, it acquired another social dimension within social species and only within species with no great environmental threats.
Ease of survival seems to be a factor here.

I'd agree that the cultural roles can change with leisure.

Twat...is or is not sex a naturally evolved method of reproduction?

One of a few, I agree.

If one species develops a utility of getting rid of anal warts by using sexual acts then this is a matter that should be studied once the primary reason why sex evolved is decided upon.

Well reproduction is primary but 'sex' appears to depend upon species.

Why does pedophilia evolve, twat?

Does it?

Why is homosexuality marketed as a New Age lifestyle?

Is it? I think this your blinkers as I thought it just an abandonment of the religious and 'naturalists' prescriptive marketing approach towards sex and the social milieu.

Why are these sexual displays found amongst the species you mention? What purpose do they serve?

Social interaction I presume?

Did nature evolve the human anus to insert a penis into?

Why did it evolve masturbation?

But they are twat, as each hue has a psychological impact.
Twat, red causes a different visceral reaction in the mind than blue.

But not the same across cultures. How do you explain this?

Twat, Symmetry=Beauty. Symmetry=Intelligence.

What do you mean by 'intelligence'? Still, the black appear pretty symmetrical so pretty smart then?

Twat, parity of work was made possible with technologies...technologies were male inventions, products of male creativity and rooted in male on male competitiveness.
Technology is the uniforming factor, Twat.
Without it there would be no equality in work.

Given that the bulk of the worlds heavy labour is done by women whilst the male sits about I'd agree with you. But since we have the technology I fail to understand why you think there should be a disparity in pay?

You as a biological form are not capable of producing the same work as a man...well an average one, at least. What helps you do so is technology, you twat.

You'd have to explain why the bulk of the heavy labour is done by women across the world then?

And how is anything invented Twat?
Divine inspiration...a mysterious epiphany?

Necessity and/or leisure. Did you know that black slaves made improvements to the technology that they used?

The one inventing the bow does not come from outer-space, Twat, and he does not just wake up one day and decides to invent something.

Neither did she who invented the tools for the homefires.

Of course, twat...and Niggers smell like banana peels. Females are flowery in their stench, particularly during that time of the month.
What a stupid **** you are.

And what a smelly, hairy bubble you are, eww!!

Wow!
Such institutionalized credentials to prove that even a chimp can learn how to use semiotics.
Did they have diplomas on their walls, Twat? Did they wear suits with nice ties?

What are you burbling about now!? You made a claim about how black men look and act and I gave you examples of those who did not fit your little bubble and asked if they were not 'niggers' then. Your response shows your blinkers.

I've met doctors who are complete morons. Specialization, Twat...a kind of social autism.

I can only assume that you have no qualifications that causes this all this bull about academia.

If you are going to use those emotionally laden words trained into you with an accompanying reaction, then along with Hitler do not forget Holocaust.

Its your emotional reaction. Me, I think at least he wasn't an under-achiever.

The word Oxford must get you wet, Twat...a Pavlovian effect caused by your brain-training. What a nice bitch you are.

Nah! Imperial College boy me!

Shit...I forgot what a boring Twat you were.

Talking to yourself again?

Am I saying we should kill niggers, dear?
Am I advocating mass slaughter?

No idea? As like most of your philosophical political and metaphysical ilk you are tre shy of stating solutions to the things you raise.

Your idea of nature, Twat, is a stroll in the park, and a fabulous exhibition of wild-life caged and quarantined so that they retain their pristine purity and their noble savagery.

"pristine purity and their noble savagery." How could they do that in zoos or parks? Do you walk in your canuck wilds unarmed? My idea of "nature" is that its a human construct and what it describes depends upon the aims of the describer.

Remember, Twat...if you dare to say that pigs are smarter than squirrels then you must mean that squirrels should be tortured...I mean what else would a swine, like you, mean?

You really must stop talking to those voices in your head. All I've ever asked you is what do you actually propose with your thoughts? Or are you just another in a long line of philosophical wafflers.

Are you implying, Twat, that mutations - including unfit ones - do not come from environmental influences affecting the replication of genes, passing on these mutations to the offspring?
Is homosexuality magical...mystical...fabulous?

Are you proposing its genetic now? You think there is a 'gay gene'?

I do not propose that mutations do not arise from environmental factors, mainly radiation. They also appear to have come from transcription errors with no external factors at all.

Why not pedophilia, then?

More a question for you as you propose the 'gay gene' I thought?

What of retardation, as found in your blood-line? Is it bad luck?

When did you stop beating your 'wife'?

Outside of the possibility that you were kicked in the head by a mule, what would account for your obvious stupidity...and would it not be passed on to your retarded children?

The same thing that will pass your bile and blinkers onto your son, nurture.

Oh well...so much for Evolution Theory.

There is now evidence that even you being kicked in the head by a mule, causing severe brain damage also gets passed on to the child.

No there isn't is there. Now the mother being brain damaged during pregnancy could cause oxygen starvation and stress to the foetus that may affect its development but thats not the same as your wish to overturn the primary axiom about Darwinian E.T. that phenotype does not effect genotype, mainly for your own political and cultural blinkers. If you are once again misusing this Epigenetics I'd point to the Epigenome being, in the main, reset at conception and its just 1% that have this ability with respect to inheritance and think you are extending it to other aspects to kustify your own political aims.

My, my, how dependent you are on the abstract.

Nothing abstract at all, Feynman and Turing were homosexuals, by your lights I assume they'd be unfit and in your brave new world would have been bred or socialised out. Turing is a good example of what happens when you and your ilk get your way and we lost a genius because of it.

If not he then another.

If a pedophile revolutionized physics would you accept pedophilia as a new social norm for the sake of enjoying his thinking?

No, as its a matter of consensuality.

How about if he were a man enjoying inter-species love making?
Would you accept him as your neighbor just to enjoy the new toaster he made possible for ya?

How very Christain of you, as the Bible is full of laws against such things. Apart from obvious cruelty he can do what he likes with his pets is my thought.

You have no pride, do ya twat? It's all about maintaining your Modern lifestyle and all the things you now cannot do without.
You have no integrity...it's all about your needs.

Twat! Given you've said that this is the base of mans experience. That you use the tool of a homosexual to publish your bile just shows your hypocrisy.

[Satyr]

[DELETED BY RICK]

[vegetariantaxidermy]

I'm sure you do this just to get your threads to the top again.

[Satyr]

Yes...because nothing in them has any merit.

Move on, imbecile...you belong here.
Never doubt the power of your stupidity....when it is shared by almost everyone around you.
It is a power few men have learned to harness.