Don't mess with women

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Don't mess with women

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Because you won't win :lol:

Just looking at the livestream of Kelli=Jay Keen in Melbourne. Now all she needs to do is keep the religious fuckturds out of the argument. It only needs science and logic. Religious nutters can keep their crappy unhelpful agneda to themselves. Same with the 'left' versus 'right' morons. What 'wing' were the suffragettes?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o47VZv ... ie-JayKeen
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Walker »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 3:32 amWhat 'wing' were the suffragettes?
Since they were activists back in the olden days, probably the Active Wing. The women amongst them were probably the Passive-Active (Passive-Aggressive) Wing.
https://opticsmag.com/types-of-bird-wings/

The Mess Around
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQjKFXA4QPA
Iwannaplato
Posts: 6660
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Iwannaplato »

Walker wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:43 pm The women amongst them were probably the Passive-Active (Passive-Aggressive) Wing.
Hardly...
When by 1903 women in Britain had not been enfranchised, Pankhurst decided that women had to "do the work ourselves";[7] the WSPU motto became "deeds, not words". The suffragettes heckled politicians, tried to storm parliament, were attacked and sexually assaulted during battles with the police, chained themselves to railings, smashed windows, carried out a nationwide bombing and arson campaign, and faced anger and ridicule in the media.
In addition to protests, meetings, intra-family and friend circles discussions, publishing tracts and more.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Agent Smith »

"What's this?"
"Really? Is that the first thought to cross yer mind?
"Whaddaya mean?"
"I mean, quite obviously, it isn't an elephant now is it?"
"Yes, but so what?"
"As I suspected, you need more time."
"How did you know?"
"I don't, how could I ... know?"
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Walker »

Interesting. Here’s a precursor to that Wing.
Different time, same Wing.
Wrath of the Market Women
https://www.worldhistory.org/Women%27s_ ... ersailles/

The Women's March on Versailles, also known as the October March or the October Days, was a defining moment in the early months of the French Revolution (1789-1799). On 5 October 1789, crowds of Parisian market women marched on Versailles, demanding reforms. They besieged the palace and forced King Louis XVI of France (r. 1774-1792) to return with them to Paris.
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Walker »

The rest of the story …

Rather than use swords, knives and farm impliments like the Market of Women of Paris in the painting, the suffragettes used their feminine powers to persuade men to their cause by giving them a dose of living hell, one at a time, each woman persuading her own man with sword-like words and other aggressions, including passive.

Image

October March
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Walker »

The women amongst them were probably the Passive-Active (Passive-Aggressive) Wing.
Iwannaplato wrote:Hardly...
Well, when we stop torturing the bird metaphor, obviously both the suffragettes and the Market Women were of the Revolutionary Wing.

The Revolutionary Wing is in everyone, thus it is inherent.

What activates it is secondary conditions which may not be the same for everyone. For some women, denial of societal rights and perks that men or royality enjoy (secondary condition) is enough to set them off. For other women, getting their order wrong at a fast-food joint (secondary condition) is enough to bring out the revolutionary.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 6660
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Iwannaplato »

Walker wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:47 pm The women amongst them were probably the Passive-Active (Passive-Aggressive) Wing.
I don't have any way to get numbers but a lot of the most violent acts were carried out by women.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffraget ... %20Asquith.
https://www.bl.uk/votes-for-women/artic ... knowledged.
You can go through the examples and see women well represented.
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Walker »

Iwannaplato wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:29 pm
Walker wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:47 pm The women amongst them were probably the Passive-Active (Passive-Aggressive) Wing.
I don't have any way to get numbers but a lot of the most violent acts were carried out by women.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffraget ... %20Asquith.
https://www.bl.uk/votes-for-women/artic ... knowledged.
You can go through the examples and see women well represented.
Before anyone activates those links you must declare if any violence depicted therein is as righteously motivated as The Market Women with their cause, or the Suffragettes with their cause; that is, unless you have the relativist position that all revolutions are as equally righteous as all opinions. Don’t get hung up on the word must, as it’s there merely to encourage discussion that correlates with the point of the thread, which is justice for women.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 6660
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Iwannaplato »

Walker wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 4:55 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:29 pm
Walker wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:47 pm The women amongst them were probably the Passive-Active (Passive-Aggressive) Wing.
I don't have any way to get numbers but a lot of the most violent acts were carried out by women.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffraget ... %20Asquith.
https://www.bl.uk/votes-for-women/artic ... knowledged.
You can go through the examples and see women well represented.
Before anyone activates those links you must declare if any violence depicted therein is as righteously motivated as The Market Women with their cause, or the Suffragettes with their cause; that is, unless you have the relativist position that all revolutions are as equally righteous as all opinions. Don’t get hung up on the word must, as it’s there merely to encourage discussion that correlates with the point of the thread, which is justice for women.
The links are addressing the idea of women being passive aggressive. We don't have to weigh in on the other issue.
If the passive-aggressive is not important, then don't bring it up.
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

So-called 'trans activists' have shown how tolerant and harmless they are in Nyoo Zilind. This woman has been defamed in the NZ media and constantly referred to as an 'anti-trans activist' when she is actually a women's rights activist.

Woman: Adult human female.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDuy2Kx ... ie-JayKeen
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Walker »

Iwannaplato wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 9:50 pm The links are addressing the idea of women being passive aggressive. We don't have to weigh in on the other issue.
If the passive-aggressive is not important, then don't bring it up.
You've probably heard the terrible news by now. A man, or woman, went into a private school in Nashville and killed six people, three of them children.

Here's the point: From the news descriptions I could not figure out if this was a man/woman, or a woman/man. Then I saw the school surveillance video. It was a woman. I could tell by the walk and the form.

Yes, I know. That's not passive-aggressive. She was active-aggressive.
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by Walker »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 8:12 pm So-called 'trans activists' have shown how tolerant and harmless they are in Nyoo Zilind. This woman has been defamed in the NZ media and constantly referred to as an 'anti-trans activist' when she is actually a women's rights activist.

Woman: Adult human female.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDuy2Kx ... ie-JayKeen
So, what's going on with the videos? I saw the beginnings of both for a minute or so. It would take a couple of hours to watch them both. She's attractive, nice voice.

I take it there are demonstrations going on in your formerly free country, perhaps violence, to silence her?

Is there a particularly interesting part of either video to watch?
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Walker wrote: Tue Mar 28, 2023 3:48 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 8:12 pm So-called 'trans activists' have shown how tolerant and harmless they are in Nyoo Zilind. This woman has been defamed in the NZ media and constantly referred to as an 'anti-trans activist' when she is actually a women's rights activist.

Woman: Adult human female.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDuy2Kx ... ie-JayKeen
So, what's going on with the videos? I saw the beginnings of both for a minute or so. It would take a couple of hours to watch them both. She's attractive, nice voice.

I take it there are demonstrations going on in your formerly free country, perhaps violence, to silence her?

Is there a particularly interesting part of either video to watch?
I don't know what you're seeing but as far as I can tell you just need to fast forward to where she arrives at the place in Auckland nz where she is legally booked to speak, then watch to the end. She had to flee the country after death threats. Unfortunatly it doesn't show the older women being punched in the face and many other assaults caught on video.
NZ was fucked when its main independent news source was sold to the yanks. How ironic. Americans, who crow the most about their 'freedoms' and 'free speech' have destroyed our own. NZ's US owned mainstream media outlet had been deliberately stirring up a frenzied mob weeks before she even got here, constantly calling her an 'anti trans activist' when in fact she's a women's rights advocate, referring to her as 'extreme right wing' which is so far from the truth it's not even funny.
So the 'weak, vulnuerable' 'trans community' has essentially taken over the world. Poor, down-trodden things.
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Don't mess with women

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

When you have to make up bullshit words, phrases and concepts to create an 'argument' then you are announcing to the world that you are full of shit with nothing but hot air to support your position. When you know that's not going to work you do the next best thing: violent intimidation.
Post Reply