JK Rowling vs. History

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 22257
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: JK Rowling vs. History

Post by Immanuel Can »

Belinda wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:09 pm ...good is the default and evil is absence of good.
The "default"? That makes it sound like good is automatic...in which case, it deserves no "praise."
You blame the evil act but not the person who committed the evil act
You can't have an act without an actor. So if the deed is culpable, then the actor is the culprit.
You praise the good act and the person for making the better choice.
It doesn't make any sense to praise something that's merely a "default." A "default" is what happens anyway, all else being equal. It shows no special merit to revert to a "default."
Post Reply