Atla wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:49 am
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:47 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:25 am
Here is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of one who makes a CLAIM, but when questioned or challenged about that CLAIM, they are NOT able to CLARIFY nor ELABORATE ON.
These people, in the days when this was being written, just about ALWAYS ASSUMED that I was SAYING some thing, or POINTING OUT some thing, when I was just asking clarifying questions from a Truly OPEN perspective.
These people had NOT YET re-learned HOW to just LOOK AT and SEE things, without having some PRESUMPTION/ASSUMPTION involved.
Age, if you want to have a conversation, that's one thing. But to sit there and address an audience that doesn't exist is, well, weird. I'm here Age, I'm not "in the days when this was being written." Come on man. Grow up already.
Nah Age doesn't want to have a conversation, she (he?) just wants to preach. We are just using her for psychological experiments because she seems to have an unusually rare combination of mental issues.
With some things 'you', "atla", are FAR MORE OPEN than ANY one else here. But, then, at other times, 'you' go back to being as CLOSED as "others" ARE.
Now;
What do you think or BELIEVE I am "preaching", EXACTLY?
Who is the 'we' here that you are referring to?
How is that 'we' using 'me'?
What "psychological experiments" are 'you', and "them", carrying out, EXACTLY?
What are my "mental issues", supposedly, an "unusually rare combination" in relation to, EXACTLY?
Oh, and by the way, what, EXACTLY, are my "mental issues"?