FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:02 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
This is information that lets us know what things future generations are going to be thinking and doing, right?
What???
You have gone COMPLETELY OFF TRACK, so no.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
So us, that's who I want the information for.
Not just me, not just Uwot, but everyone who is already visiting this site without being "future generations"
But 'you', "flashdangerpants", and "uwot", have SHOWN that neither of you are YET capable of UNDERSTANDING this information.
So this new information, to be released soon,
What do you mean by 'new'?
Did I use the 'new' word here?
If no, then WHY did you ALL OF SUDDEN just START using the 'new' word?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
which is the special information that proves you are right about the future and n ot merely a guy who believes a thing will happen ....
WHY did you add the 'special' word for? What does the 'special' word in this context mean or refer to, to you?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
isn't very different from all the other information you've been "sharing" with "the world"?
What 'other' information?
Look, if some 'thing' has NOT YET be shared with you, then REALLY you have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA what that 'thing' ACTUALLY IS, correct?
Or, are you under some delusion or BELIEF that you, somehow, ALREADY KNOW what has NOT YET been shared, with you?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:02 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
Is that the God-Channeling stuff Atla was speaking of?
Would it NOT be better to ask "atla", itself, instead of 'me', about what "atla" was speaking of, EXACTLY?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
Is that where the the
'the words under the label "age" are coming from'?
Are you bringing us the word of God?
What is the 'word of God', and better still does 'God' even exist to you, first?
ClarIFYiNg qUEstIOn KeN..... when you wrote
"See, the one known as "age" can NOT and will NOT be thanked. This is because of where EXACTLY the words under the label "age" are coming from become FULLY UNDERSTOOD, and that is One who is NOT to be thanked AT ALL. The ones who are to be Truly THANKED are the ones who were in the generation that had the Courage and the Honesty to MAKE the CHANGE for the BENEFIT of ALL 'future generations'." Where exactly are the
words under the label "age" coming from?
The EXACT SAME place as the words under ALL labels. From a human body.
Now, ONCE AGAIN, WHY will you NOT answer CLarIFYiNg gUEstiOns posed to 'you', "sally"?
I asked 'you'; What is the 'word of God', and does 'God' even exist to you?
So, WHY will you NOT answer this question? What are you AFRAID of?
And WHY do you write the term 'clarifying question' with the absurd mixture of capital and small letters?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:02 am
Because of the information, and the knowledge, which ALREADY exists. How many times do you have to be informed of this before you comprehend it?
If you say and BELIEVE so, then it is SO.
Is there ANY thing wrong with this?
If yes, then 'what', EXACTLY?
The only problem really is that your predictions haven't been expressions of factual information.
How does one express, TO YOU, 'factual information', in regards to 'predictions'?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
So your regular announcements that you don't believe anything must be untrue.
LOL The reason you can NOT let go of this BELIEF of yours is because you BELIEVE that EVERY one MUST BELIEVE things, correct?
If this is NOT correct, then what is?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Beause when you tell us what you predict in the future you are simply telling us what you believe will happen.
NO I am NOT. You ONLY say this because this is ONLY what you BELIEVE is true. And you say and BELIEVE this because you can NOT YET comprehend what I have been TELLING YOU.
LOOK, imagine you were a person who ALREADY HAD THE INFORMATION that the earth revolves around the sun, when almost EVERY one else BELIEVED the opposite. You also KNEW that this ALREADY OBTAINED INFORMATION was IRREFUTABLY True. So, you could also SAY and CLAIM, or predict, that 'future generations' will also come to KNOW that REALLY the earth revolves around the sun, instead of the other way around, which almost EVERY one was BELIEVING was true, at that moment when you were saying/predicting this.
So, the 'factual information' ALREADY EXISTED. But ONLY you KNEW it. Therefore, you could CLAIM that 'future generations' will come to KNOW this knowledge, when you release it, and ALSO CLAIM to KNOW that this is True WITHOUT necessarily BELIEVING it is true, besides 'earth destroying comets' and such like, before you release the information.
Now, are you, at least, STARTING to COMPREHEND?
Or, are you STILL MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING what is happening and occurring here?
I COULD 'give you the FACTUAL INFORMATION, which PROVES that this is ACTUALLY True and NOT just a BELIEF AT ALL. BUT, we are STILL WAITING for you to do what is NECESSARY in order to be ABLE to GRASP and OBTAIN, relatively, 'new' knowledge.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:02 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
So the reason why you do the whole "you humans" thing, is that because you are God?
How many times do 'you' have to be told that the you is NOT God and NEVER could be God, before 'you' comprehend and understand this FACT?
So, the True, Right, and Correct answer here to you question REMAINS FOREVER OBVIOUS. Therefore, your question here is just MOOT.
'Moot' in Kenlgish means you don't want to answer it?
What do you MEAN "I do NOT want to answer it"?
I JUST ANSWERED it. Could you REALLY NOT SEE the ANSWER?
I SAID: the 'you' is NOT God and can NEVER be God. So the ANSWER to your question is OBVIOUSLY NO.
NO
NO
NO
In case you MISSED this AGAIN. The 'you' can NEVER be God. And, OBVIOUSLY the word and label "age" is in reference to A 'you'.
ALL of 'you', including the one known as "age" here, in this forum, is NOT God, and NEVER could be God.
So, the True, Right, and Correct ANSWER here to your question REMAINS FOREVER OBVIOUS. AND, that ANSWER IS NO.
Do you NOW comprehend AND understand that the ANSWER to your question "...., is that because you are God?" is
NO
ANY thing that references 'me', the 'you' known as "age", as God is ALWAYS INCORRECT. Therefore, ANY question that asks, "is that because you are God", is then ALWAYS JUST MOOT.
So, to JUMP to the CONCLUSION that, "you don't want to answer it", just SHOWS and PROVES just how QUICK, SIMPLE, and EASILY people will come up with ABSOLUTELY False, Wrong, and/or Incorrect TWISTED and DISTORTED CONCLUSIONS, just because they WANT TO KEEP and MAINTAIN their previously HELD ONTO ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
You do a whole act about Age being a label for words from some other source.
I do NOT do this AT ALL.
You ONLY ASSUME this BECAUSE you are being DELUDED by "atla's" False, Wrong, and Incorrect DELUDED BELIEFS.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Just express clearly what that really means please.
Just express clearly what 'that' REALLY means or refers to PLEASE. THEN I can and WILL just express clearly what 'that' REALLY means.
LOOK, until Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTIONS are asked, True
understanding, itself, is NOT able to be obtained.
As EVIDENCED and PROVEN throughout this forum.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:02 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
So it is
NOT CERTAIN that future generations will do anyting in particular.
Not if a comet, or let us say, a virus wipes ALL of 'you', human beings, completely out.
But, the plan STILL REMAINS, and STILL IS ACHIEVED, because 'future generations' is a very relative term.
This Kenglish does alow you to mean anything at all with any word.
ABSOLUTELY NOT. AS ALREADY EXPLAINED, to you. BUT, BECAUSE you JUMPED to this CONCLUSION, and WANT TO BELIEVE that this ASSUMPTION and BELIEF of YOURS IS TRUE, you will KEEP and MAINTAIN this BELIEF of yours, for as long as you WANT TO. ALTHOUGH 'it' is NOT based on ANY thing, which is ACTUALLY True AT ALL.
I have even CLEARLY EXPRESSED that just about EVERY word I use here, the definition, or meaning, of can be found in an english dictionary, in the days when this is being written.
So, ALTHOUGH thee ACTUAL Truth here is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you have been SAYING and CLAIMING, you will ONLY LOOK AT, and SEE, what confers with your OWN currently held BELIEFS, which you have CONCLUDED based on YOUR Assumptions, which were made solely upon your own Previous Experiences. Which I call and refer to as 'APE thinking'.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
So in you r language that might make sense.
If you SAY and BELIEVE SO.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:02 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
Your claimed
PROOF and
KNOWLEDGE that they will, was just a prediction.
Did I?
If yes, then WHERE?
Ooops Ken, did you make an assumption about what I wrote there?
The word your in that sentence is a possessive pronoun. So "did I" is an incoherent repsonse.
Okay. Fair enough.
Now that I have made what you call an "ooops", and an "incoherent response", then EVERY thing else that I have SAID and WRITTEN MUST BE an "oooops" and "inchoerent" to you also, correct?
If I wrote, "Was it?" would that be a 'coherent response', to you?
And if yes, then if your answer/response to "Was it?" a 'Yes', then WHERE?
And, if 'it' was a 'prediction', then is there ANY thing wrong with this?
If yes, then WHAT, EXACTLY?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:02 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
It's like a child's imaginary pet octopus. She might tell us she has one, but it's invisible, so we can't see it, and it never reveals itself in any way.
This has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with what I have been talking about, and doing.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:00 am
All she has to do to equal your acheivement is say that anyone could see her imaginary pet octopus if they wouold just learn te simple art of looking for it where it actually is.
If this is what you BELIEVE, then this IS what IS true, to you.
Also, PLEASE do NOT STOP 'trying to' DISCREDIT me. The MORE you 'try' the BETTER, and the QUICKER, the OUTCOME.
It was pretty accurate though, that's the real problem here.
It MIGHT be "pretty accurate", to you. BUT, as I just SAID it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with what I have been talking about, and doing. Therefore, it was ABSOLUTELY False, Wrong, and Incorrect, and as such completely AND utterly INACCURATE.
So, there is, LITERALLY, NO 'problem' AT ALL here.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Eventually, if you had mastery of the information you lay claim to, you would show it,
AND, as I SAY, and CLAIM, I WILL SHOW it, EVENTUALLY.
But, as I have ALREADY MADE CLEAR, I am CERTAINLY in NO RUSH AT ALL.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
but instead you go round and round telling everyone you have it instead.
And does that REALLY 'annoy' you?
If no, then 'what', EXACTLY, is the, supposed, "issue" here?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
Your "search for the right words" to explain thee truth will take longer than a human lifespan to complete unless you learn something from us that you have been failing to understand first.
Do NOT worry. I am LEARNING from 'you', human beings, about how to communicate with 'you', human beings.
But let us NOT FORGET, which you are SHOWING you do QUITE REGULARLY, that I am NOT 'finding the right words' to explain 'thee truth' AT ALL. I am 'finding the right words' to explain to 'you' HOW 'you' can find 'thee Truth' by, and for, "yourselves".
I use a 'heuristic approach', if ANY one is interested.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
But you aren't any more open and curious than anyone else Ken.
Are you ABSOLUTELY SURE and POSITIVE of this "sally"?
Do you BELIEVE this is true?
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:04 pm
In the unlikely event that you know something worth describing as "theee truth", your haughty arrogance will ensure you never tell anyone at all in any generation.
Okay. If you take what I am doing here as "haughty arrogance", then that is PERFECTLY FINE, with me.
However, when what I am ACTUALLY DOING is Truly understood by "others", then what might be found is that they do NOT see ANY, so called, "haughty arrogance" AT ALL. But, if they do, then they might understand FULLY the reason WHY?