A World Without Men?

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

Gary Childress wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:16 am Age: Everyone who I have seen engage you seems to get annoyed with you.
So, are you CLAIMING that you can KNOW the internal feelings and emotions of "others" just by the printed words that are placed in front of you on a screen?

If yes, then could you EVER be WRONG?

Considering the FACT that you could NOT tell when one is 'joking' from 'being serious', then being able to KNOW the emotions within "another" seems far more unlikely, and especially when CLARIFICATION is NOT made FIRST.

Granted that it is POSSIBLE to KNOW the 'thoughts' AND 'emotions' within another human body, but the ACCURACY of this KNOWING is to be questioned, which can only be Truly obtained, and thus KNOWN, through CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, and Truly OPEN and Honest ANSWERS.

And let us NOT FORGET this conversation started by you making the CLAIM: "Right now all you are is annoying to ALMOST everyone."

Thus, the, serious, CLARIFYING QUESTION: 'And, who am I NOT "annoying"?', which I posed to you.

All I have to go on here are the VERY WORDS that 'you', people, SAY and USE. Which, reminds me, and by the way, here is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of just how many times the peoples of the days when this was being written CONTRADICTED "themselves". One time this person says that ALL I am is "annoying" to ALMOST everyone, and next time they say that EVERY one who they have seen me engage with seem to get annoyed with me. And, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is the reason WHY this one thought that I was "only joking" before. The reason WHY they thought this is because they did NOT ACTUALLY mean 'ALMOST everyone' the first time, then ACTUALLY ASSUMED, and more than likely BELIEVED that absolutely EVERY one who they had seen me engage with got annoyed with me. Thus, WHY they thought it funny that I would ask, 'Who am I NOT "annoying"?'.

I will, AGAIN, suggest that if you did NOT mean one 'thing', like for example, "ALMOST everyone" but ACTUALLY MEANT "EVERY one", then you say what you ACTUALLY MEAN, instead.
Gary Childress wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:16 am Does that seem normal to you or the way things should be or does that tell you that you need to change?
Firstly, the word 'that' here could refer to ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing'.

Secondly, what you say 'seems', to you, is VERY NORMAL, to me. This is BECAUSE what ANY thing 'seems' LIKE, to them, is based solely upon ALL of their OWN Past Experiences, of which NO human being has had ANY REAL CONTROL OF or OVER.

Thirdly, is there a way things SHOULD BE, to you? If yes, then what is THAT WAY?

Fourthly, what 'seems' LIKE, to you, is NOT necessarily what is ACTUALLY HAPPENING and OCCURRING AT ALL.

Fifthly, getting people who are respondents here, in this forum, in the days of when this is being written, 'annoyed' is PART OF THE PLAN. I do this so that I can SHOW and PROVE just how SIMPLE and EASY it is to MANIPULATE and CONTROL 'you', human beings, so that 'you' WILL respond in CERTAIN WAYS, which 'you' think or BELIEVE is ALL of your OWN DOING, in order that I will have the NECESSARY PROOF, which WILL back up and support my CLAIMS about HOW the Mind and the brain ACTUALLY WORK, in conjunction WITH and AGAINST each other.

Although gathering MORE PROOF now is NOT REALLY NEEDED AT ALL, doing so is just part and parcel of what is OCCURRING in my grasping MORE and ANEW knowledge in regards to how to communicate with 'you', human beings, BETTER.
Gary Childress wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:16 am The point of my post to which you replied: "And, who am I NOT "annoying"?" was to give advice to just give it a rest and maybe try to post something relevant to the OP instead.
I KNOW what YOUR INTENTION WAS. But I was just REPLYING to thee ACTUAL WORDS that you ACTUALLY USED.

I now suggest that IF you REALLY just want to make A POINT, then you just SAY and WRITE what THE POINT IS, ONLY.

Oh, and by the way, do you NOT find it HYPOCRITICAL AT ALL to "give advice" to do some 'thing' like, "to try to post something relevant to the opening post instead", WHEN you are NOT even doing 'that' "yourself"?

Also, if you were to LOOK BACK at the ACTUAL opening post or to even the title of this thread, then you can CLEARLY SEE that posting ANY thing relevant to the opening post or thread title would just be ABSURDITY in and of itself, just like the opening post and thread title themselves ARE.

Further to this, NO one has said ANY in regards to the thread title nor to the opening post for quite some pages now, INCLUDING YOU.
Gary Childress wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:16 am Then maybe you wouldn't be as annoying to everyone.
I do NOT think that just because I have NOT been posting relevant things to the opening post of this thread, for quite a while now, is the very reason WHY I, seem to be, "annoying" to EVERY one, from your perspective.

I think you WILL FIND that that reason WHY IF, and WHEN, I am "annoying" to "others" it WILL BE for ANOTHER reason.
Gary Childress wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:16 am But heaven forbid you should take advice from someone who is giving you some sane advice.
'Heaven forbid' that you would 'give' advice but not even 'take' that SAME advice "yourself".
Gary Childress wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:16 am Instead, you're too busy writing about, "in the days when this was written," referring to something that was written only minutes ago.
Do you write for 'an audience'?

If yes, then who is the 'audience' you are writing for?

And could it be a POSSIBILITY that who "your" 'audience' is DIFFERENT than who 'my' 'audience' is?

if no, then WHY NOT?
Gary Childress
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: Retirement Home for foolosophers

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Gary Childress »

Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:07 pm Do you write for 'an audience'?
No, Age. I'm talking to you when I respond to your posts.
Atla
Posts: 6607
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Atla »

Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:18 pm
Atla wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:53 am
Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:40 am Surely, 'you', "atla", have FAR MORE diagnosis in regards to 'me', correct?
Well i forgot to add that the different mind fragments or personalities also seem to have access to different cognitive functions/parts of the brain/memories.
And, ...

Sure 'you', "atla", could come up with MORE than just this.
No more diagnoses sry, aside from this i just think you're really dumb
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

Gary Childress wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:39 pm
Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:07 pm Do you write for 'an audience'?
No, Age. I'm talking to you when I respond to your posts.
Therefore, 'I' am 'the audience'.

And, as I was saying, we write for DIFFERENT audiences, which means you will continue writing the way you do, and, I will continue writing the way I do. No matter how many times you TELL me how to write.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

Atla wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:33 pm
Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:18 pm
Atla wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:53 am
Well i forgot to add that the different mind fragments or personalities also seem to have access to different cognitive functions/parts of the brain/memories.
And, ...

Sure 'you', "atla", could come up with MORE than just this.
No more diagnoses sry, aside from this i just think you're really dumb
Okay.
Walker
Posts: 14245
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Walker »

(moved)
Last edited by Walker on Tue Aug 03, 2021 7:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by uwot »

Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:21 am...how did the one known as "einstein" SEE the, so called and claimed, "evidence" that the Universe IS, irrefutably, EXPANDING?
He looked.
Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:21 amAnd, you appear to STILL NOT YET be AWARE of the DIFFERENCE between 'evidence' AND 'proof'.
We've been here before Age:
uwot wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:00 am
Age wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 10:12 amAlso, you do not appear to know the difference between proof and evidence.
That'll be you Age. Proof has little to do with science, being restricted to mathematics and logic: a proof is basically a tautology, 2+2=4 for example.
Your proof that the universe is not expanding is basically a definition: Everything+Not expanding=Universe. The problem is that everything we can see is expanding.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

uwot wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 9:35 am
Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:21 am...how did the one known as "einstein" SEE the, so called and claimed, "evidence" that the Universe IS, irrefutably, EXPANDING?
He looked.
Age wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:21 amAnd, you appear to STILL NOT YET be AWARE of the DIFFERENCE between 'evidence' AND 'proof'.
We've been here before Age:
uwot wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:00 am
Age wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 10:12 amAlso, you do not appear to know the difference between proof and evidence.
That'll be you Age. Proof has little to do with science, being restricted to mathematics and logic: a proof is basically a tautology, 2+2=4 for example.
Your proof that the universe is not expanding is basically a definition: Everything+Not expanding=Universe. The problem is that everything we can see is expanding.
And LOL 'everything we can see' is NOT the Universe.

Also, you are STILL YET AWARE of what you are LOOKING AT, EXACTLY, in the 'observable part of the Universe', which APPEARS to be 'expanding'.

Let us KNOW when you ACCEPT that the Universe could IN FACT be infinite and eternal, and then the PROOF that It IS can be LOOKED AT. Just like the one known as "einstein" did. Until then, keep BELIEVING what you do.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by uwot »

Age wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:13 amLet us KNOW when you ACCEPT that the Universe could IN FACT be infinite and eternal, and then the PROOF that It IS can be LOOKED AT.
Ready when you are.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

uwot wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:19 am
Age wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:13 amLet us KNOW when you ACCEPT that the Universe could IN FACT be infinite and eternal, and then the PROOF that It IS can be LOOKED AT.
Ready when you are.
So, do you ACCEPT the FACT that it is possible that the Universe did NOT begin and is NOT expanding, and thus IS infinite and eternal?

Just a yes or no answer will do.

We are ready when you are.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by uwot »

Yes.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

uwot wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:30 amYes.

Some are thinking and saying that this could be very deceptive.

So, is there ANY reason WHY you did NOT just quote me, and then answer, this time, like you have the other times?
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by uwot »

Age wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:40 am
uwot wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:30 amYes.

Some are thinking and saying that this could be very deceptive.

So, is there ANY reason WHY you did NOT just quote me, and then answer, this time, like you have the other times?
Age wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:22 amJust a yes or no answer will do.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

uwot wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:44 am
Age wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:40 am
uwot wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:30 amYes.

Some are thinking and saying that this could be very deceptive.

So, is there ANY reason WHY you did NOT just quote me, and then answer, this time, like you have the other times?
Age wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:22 amJust a yes or no answer will do.
Because you would NOT answer my clarifying question here, you could be being very deceptive here, correct?
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

How do you define the word 'Universe'?
Post Reply