You 'take it' wrong then. If you want to make assumptions then going by your posts I would have to assume that you don't have the emotional strength or maturity to cope with a breakup in a genuine relationship. I think you are getting off lightly. There is a reason why women aren't attracted to men with obvious mental health 'issues', unless those men have some other outstanding attribute that makes women prepared to turn a blind eye to their mental problems or feel that they can 'fix' them; eg extreme sexual magnetism. genius, great talent in the arts... But even then, those individuals make notoriously awful and unreliable romantic partners. When you stop caring so much about being in a relationship is when they will become available to you.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 10:54 pmI take it you've never had strong romantic feelings for someone? I guess we're just different in the way we perceive the world. I don't see anything terribly wrong with infatuation in and of itself. It can lead to deeper feelings. For those who are lucky to have it returned it could be a very rewarding experience.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 9:50 pmIf that's the case then you must be doing something wrong. I doubt if you are 'in love' with this person. You are infatuated with her. There's a big difference. There's no point in getting angry at everyone else. What's wrong with being on your own anyway? Get a dog.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 1:30 pm
God, I hate playing the asshole. You're OK, Age. I'm the one who needs to get help. I'm going insane over this woman I'm in love with. It just makes me angry at everything and everyone that no woman has ever returned my affection. Well, one did but she returned everyone else's affection too.
A World Without Men?
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A World Without Men?
Last edited by vegetariantaxidermy on Sun Jul 25, 2021 1:27 am, edited 3 times in total.
Re: A World Without Men?
LOL You OBVIOUSLY did NOT say this at all. As can be CLEARLY SEEN, and thus PROVED True.
You MAY have MEANT some thing else, but what you ACTUALLY SAID can be SEEN, CLEARLY.
LOL
For ANY or ALL of 'you', human beings, who want to CLAIM that I BELIEVE ANY thing, then instead of just CLAIMING I do, PROVIDE the ACTUAL PROOF for YOUR CLAIM.
Re: A World Without Men?
Firstly, I do NOT believe ANY thing. WHEN will you AGREE with and ACCEPT this? You OBVIOUSLY could NOT refute this CLAIM, so just continually writing that I believe 'things' is just a complete and utter 'waste of time', as some say.uwot wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 5:35 pmDo you believe that should you TELL and EXPLAIN to me how to find "find thee ACTUAL Truth" by and for myself, I will find the same ACTUAL Truth that you already know?Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 2:59 amI am NOT here to just TELL or EXPLAIN, to you, what thee ACTUAL Truth IS. I am here to TELL and EXPLAIN, to you, HOW you can find thee ACTUAL Truth by, and for, "yourself". This is just what I am in the process of learning how to communicate better with 'you', human beings.
Secondly, the WHOLE POINT of ALLOWING 'you' to find thee ACTUAL Truth for, and by, "yourself", is so that IF people are coming to the EXACT SAME FINDINGS, then we KNOW, FOR SURE, that we are obtaining thee ACTUAL Truth of things.
SEE, the way to VERIFY what is ACTUALLY True or NOT is achieved accurate and correctly this way.
Re: A World Without Men?
Well this was OBVIOUSLY NOT CLEAR. IF you had just said that "it is the previous post that you had written to this one", then that makes it VERY CLEAR.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pmOkay Ken, some of your stupidity must be play acting right? I posted the exact thing you asked for as one post, and then referenced it in the bext post with advice to scroll up to the post above. This Shit can't be beyond you.
As can be CLEARLY SEEN you NEVER "advised" " to scroll up to "the post above" ". You OBVIOUSLY just wrote: "Scroll up". Thus the very reason WHY I talked about how you did NOT provide LINKS nor EXACT POSITIONS.
Now you are being UNCLEAR AGAIN. Do you MEAN "this post" or a "previous post" you wrote?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm So THE EXACT POSITION is "two posts above this one"
And people wonder WHY they could NOT YET find thee ACTUAL Truth of things. The way people wrote, back in the days when this was being written, it is VERY OBVIOUS WHY they were STILL SO CONFUSED.
Thank you. FINALLY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm because you happened to have written a reply to somebody else between my two posts, that's where I answered your question in very precise and true terms.
If you want to make a CLAIM that some 'thing' is some 'where', then it is BETTER for 'us' that you PROVIDE thee link, or the EXACT POSITION, to EXACTLY 'where' it is. And, EVEN BETTER, again, is you provide the ACTUAL WORDS that you are referring to.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm If you need a link, may I point you to the little blue up arrows besides our names in these things.
Yes I KNOW. But because I do NOT like to ASSUME ANY thing and because I am NO where near as SMART as 'you', people, here, I would NOT like to click on blue up arrows and end up in wrong posts, read wrong texts, and/or come to wrong conclusions. So, if you just PROVIDE the ACTUAL WORDS, then 'we' can LOOK AT EXACTLY 'that' what 'you' are REFERRING TO.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm Those are the links to the places that the quotes come from.
Also, and by the way, you are, ONCE AGAIN, just MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING what I said you were MISQUOTING me about, anyway. The reason I said you MISQUOTED me is NOT because of what you provided I said, years ago, but because of the way you PLACED MISQUOTES.
Now, IF you had just ask for CLARIFICATION, BEFORE you JUMPED to an ASSUMPTION, and CONCLUSION, which ended up just being PLAIN Wrong, ONCE AGAIN, then we would NOT have, ONCE AGAIN, 'wasted so much time', ONCE MORE.
I have been requesting clarification on teh simple matter of whether you are predicting that persons in the yeart 2100 will be visiting this forum to learn about your grand wisdom.[/quote]Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 amWell what can be CLEARLY SEEN, in the original text and context that it was written, now that you have provided it, is the ACTUAL CLARITY that you are so DESPERATELY SEEKING and WANTING from me.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:32 am
Mate, I have posted your future generations text about 20 times in big colourful letters. And.... you have clarified nothing. So, are you about to clarify anything....?
AND, I keep telling you NO.
What part of NO are you MISSING or DO NOT UNDERSTAND?
You REALLY have NOT YET discovered the ABILITY, nor learned HOW, to just REMAIN OPEN, have you?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm Or will it be persons in the year 3500 who do so? That is not at all clear.
When, and IF you EVER do, then you will discover and SEE just how much 'waste of a time' you have spent here.
Considering just how MANY TIMES that I INFORM 'you', human beings, that I do NOT BELIEVE this, or ANY thing, then SURELY it is NOT the latter, correct?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm I am looking for clarity over whether you are issuing the sort of god-chanelling vision FROM the future as Atla suspects, or are just telling us what you BELIEVE will be the case in the future.
And, I thought I was the SLOWEST one here.
CLOSED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS receive DIFFERENT ANSWERS than OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTIONS WILL.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm There is no clarification to be had from you in this matter.
And, DIFFERENT CLARIFYING QUESTIONS also receive DIFFERENT ANSWERS.
Considering you said a while ago: "We're kinda done now ...", I was HOPING that was the end of it from you. But, no.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm It's not natural for me to spend this much time on your words Ken, you aren't interesting so it bores me to bother doing this stuff.
Also, it appears VERY CONTRADICTORY for someone to do some thing, which they OBVIOUSLY do NOT 'have to' and which they CLAIM "bores them".
WHY, EXACTLY, are you spending so much time on my words if they REALLY "bore you"?
Parapraxis?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm And you aren't important, so it doesn't need doing. I'm doing this only because you are an obnoxious spam monkey who keeps taking over threads about other subjects to talk about himself.
Have you NOT YET heard of the 'ignore button'?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm Talk of what I 'desperately need' or 'want' from you is misplaced, I would be happy for there to be a little bit less of you, because what there is, is textureless and lacks variety.
There is one in this forum.
AGAIN, you might find the 'ignore button' VERY HELPFUL.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm You are human spinach, and I would like a smaller portion please.
Your CLAIM here is Wrong, ONCE AGAIN.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pmYeah, well you, Age/Ken are the person who often tells us that he has answered all clarifying questions put to him, but not received answers for those he has asked.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 amIt is NOT about, and NEVER was, about "understanding ANY 'me', referred to ANY name like "ken" nor "age".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:32 am
.... no. Still clarifying nothing at all.
WHEN do these future generations fully understand you Ken?
LOOK AT the QUOTED section of MY ACTUAL WORDS, which you THANKFULLY PROVIDED for 'us' to LOOK AT and SEE. In there I ALREADY INFORMED that 'this' is NOT necessarily for 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm So if you have been intending that as an impossible riddle, that's a bit of a dick move Ken.
Did you MISS or MISUNDERSTAND this ALSO?
This, so called, 'riddle' is therefore NOT meant for 'you', "flashdangerpants". 'you', human beings, in the days when this was being written, still have some MORE EVOLVING to do BEFORE 'this' can be BETTER and/or FULLY UNDERSTOOD.
'you', "flashdangerpants", are JUST BEING USED, in order to gather and obtain ACTUAL PROOF, for future generations to be able to LOOK AT and SEE just how the Mind and the brain work, and at HOW the brain can be human beings worst enemy.
Oh okay, if you say so.
AND, who and/or what is the 'we', EXACTLY, which 'you' are referring to here?
If this is what YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE, then this MUST BE TRUE, correct?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm You have your own, unecessary, Kenglish version of that in a language none of us speaks. And you have an unshakeable belief that future generations will understand that question in Kenglish rather than English.
Well here is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of how the brain completely and utterly DISTORTS what I has been ACTUALLY SAID, and WRITTEN CLEARLY, for ALL to LOOK AT, and SEE.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm But we remain no closer to an explanation of how you know that future generations will adopt this quite inexplicable need for "I" to refer to the universe when some new word would be a more sane way to get there.
BECAUSE Iiii has NEVER been a WORD EVERY USED BEFORE, that I am aware of anyway.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm You apparently have some reason for using "Theee" instead of 'the'', why not Iiii instead of 'I'?
Who, and/or what, EVER CLAIMED that they would?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm How do you know future generations wil adopt your particular choice of language conventions?
But I am PURPOSELY being, so called, "evasive" with 'you', "flashdangerpants". This is SO I can USE 'you' MORE the way that I WANT TO, to be completely Honest with 'you', "flashdangerpants".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pmYeah, you're a bit too evasive and bullshitty to be accusing me of dishonesty if I am to be completely honest with you Ken.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am When future generations will FULLY UNDERSTOOD is when they learn how to become Truly Honest and Truly OPEN, like 'you' ALL once were.
Explaining this to a species, and a generation, who are Truly CLOSED and Truly Dishonest, just takes some time. But, as I keep REMINDING you, there is NO RUSH. As ALL works out PERFECTLY, ANYWAY.
Have you EVER heard the expression; 'ONLY God KNOWS', before?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm And right now, what we have here is more evasion. The useful answer to "when will X happen?" is not "it will happen when it happens".
ONCE what I have been SAYING is FULLY UNDERSTOOD, then that expression will be FULLY UNDERSTOOD as well.
AGAIN, there is NO RUSH. Everything is moving according to thee PLAN, PERFECTLY.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm What is at question here is the nature of your prophecy. If it is not a matter of your personal belief, what is it?
KNOWING.
Or, instinctual, or internal, KNOWING, if that is BETTER.
The SAME WAY 'you' KNOW 'things'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pmNo, how do you actually know Ken? Drop the mysticism act and tell us the truth.
How do 'you' ACTUALLY KNOW?
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: A World Without Men?
Fine, I guess the stupidity isn't an act.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amWell this was OBVIOUSLY NOT CLEAR. IF you had just said that "it is the previous post that you had written to this one", then that makes it VERY CLEAR.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pmOkay Ken, some of your stupidity must be play acting right? I posted the exact thing you asked for as one post, and then referenced it in the bext post with advice to scroll up to the post above. This Shit can't be beyond you.
As can be CLEARLY SEEN you NEVER "advised" " to scroll up to "the post above" ". You OBVIOUSLY just wrote: "Scroll up". Thus the very reason WHY I talked about how you did NOT provide LINKS nor EXACT POSITIONS.
Now you are being UNCLEAR AGAIN. Do you MEAN "this post" or a "previous post" you wrote?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm So THE EXACT POSITION is "two posts above this one"
And people wonder WHY they could NOT YET find thee ACTUAL Truth of things. The way people wrote, back in the days when this was being written, it is VERY OBVIOUS WHY they were STILL SO CONFUSED.
You do go on at length about some stupid shit Ken. It was quite reasonable to expect somebody of basic average intelligence to get what was going on there.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amThank you. FINALLY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm because you happened to have written a reply to somebody else between my two posts, that's where I answered your question in very precise and true terms.If you want to make a CLAIM that some 'thing' is some 'where', then it is BETTER for 'us' that you PROVIDE thee link, or the EXACT POSITION, to EXACTLY 'where' it is. And, EVEN BETTER, again, is you provide the ACTUAL WORDS that you are referring to.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm If you need a link, may I point you to the little blue up arrows besides our names in these things.
Yes I KNOW. But because I do NOT like to ASSUME ANY thing and because I am NO where near as SMART as 'you', people, here, I would NOT like to click on blue up arrows and end up in wrong posts, read wrong texts, and/or come to wrong conclusions. So, if you just PROVIDE the ACTUAL WORDS, then 'we' can LOOK AT EXACTLY 'that' what 'you' are REFERRING TO.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm Those are the links to the places that the quotes come from.
Well you see, just saying NO is negative. I'm looking for you to actually tell me what you were predicting with the words you made me quote exactly twice. and you are just not doing that.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amAND, I keep telling you NO.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 am Also, and by the way, you are, ONCE AGAIN, just MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING what I said you were MISQUOTING me about, anyway. The reason I said you MISQUOTED me is NOT because of what you provided I said, years ago, but because of the way you PLACED MISQUOTES.
Now, IF you had just ask for CLARIFICATION, BEFORE you JUMPED to an ASSUMPTION, and CONCLUSION, which ended up just being PLAIN Wrong, ONCE AGAIN, then we would NOT have, ONCE AGAIN, 'wasted so much time', ONCE MORE.
I have been requesting clarification on teh simple matter of whether you are predicting that persons in the yeart 2100 will be visiting this forum to learn about your grand wisdom.
What part of NO are you MISSING or DO NOT UNDERSTAND?
You tell us to ask you clarifying question, but you don't deliver your end of the bargain.
I am under little illusion that asking you to actually clarify a clarifying question is a waste of time. I am totally open to you telling me when your prediction will come true though. Are you OPEN to actually doing that though?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amYou REALLY have NOT YET discovered the ABILITY, nor learned HOW, to just REMAIN OPEN, have you?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm Or will it be persons in the year 3500 who do so? That is not at all clear.
When, and IF you EVER do, then you will discover and SEE just how much 'waste of a time' you have spent here.
Only if it is true that DO NOT BELIEVE ANY "Things".Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amConsidering just how MANY TIMES that I INFORM 'you', human beings, that I do NOT BELIEVE this, or ANY thing, then SURELY it is NOT the latter, correct?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm I am looking for clarity over whether you are issuing the sort of god-chanelling vision FROM the future as Atla suspects, or are just telling us what you BELIEVE will be the case in the future.
But is it true? You won't clarify whether your prediction about future generations is knowledge, experience, memory or any of the other things it might be that aren't beliefs. So it might be more true that you believe you don't believe things. Perhaps if you get round to clarifying anything, we might clarify that at the same time.
Tell us what your prediction is actually a prediction of Ken. That's not a "closed" question.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 am And, I thought I was the SLOWEST one here.CLOSED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS receive DIFFERENT ANSWERS than OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTIONS WILL.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm There is no clarification to be had from you in this matter.
And, DIFFERENT CLARIFYING QUESTIONS also receive DIFFERENT ANSWERS.
I don't care about ignore buttons. When I'm busy I just ignore you by not bothering to read your posts.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amAGAIN, you might find the 'ignore button' VERY HELPFUL.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm You are human spinach, and I would like a smaller portion please.
Well we didn't need to dig up an old quote about you getting all messianic and predicting future generations would value this forum for your wisdom did we? You reel them off with merry abandon.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amYour CLAIM here is Wrong, ONCE AGAIN.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pmYeah, well you, Age/Ken are the person who often tells us that he has answered all clarifying questions put to him, but not received answers for those he has asked.LOOK AT the QUOTED section of MY ACTUAL WORDS, which you THANKFULLY PROVIDED for 'us' to LOOK AT and SEE. In there I ALREADY INFORMED that 'this' is NOT necessarily for 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm So if you have been intending that as an impossible riddle, that's a bit of a dick move Ken.
Did you MISS or MISUNDERSTAND this ALSO?
This, so called, 'riddle' is therefore NOT meant for 'you', "flashdangerpants". 'you', human beings, in the days when this was being written, still have some MORE EVOLVING to do BEFORE 'this' can be BETTER and/or FULLY UNDERSTOOD.
'you', "flashdangerpants", are JUST BEING USED, in order to gather and obtain ACTUAL PROOF, for future generations to be able to LOOK AT and SEE just how the Mind and the brain work, and at HOW the brain can be human beings worst enemy.
Who are the future generations Ken. WHEN are they Ken? HOW DO YOU KNOW?
You know that consistently boasting that you are using us as puppets for your own gratification marks you out as all the things Atla says you are by the way?
So what? My point is entirely valid, if you have some new meaning for the word "I", why not just use a new word?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amOh okay, if you say so.
AND, who and/or what is the 'we', EXACTLY, which 'you' are referring to here?
If this is what YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE, then this MUST BE TRUE, correct?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm You have your own, unecessary, Kenglish version of that in a language none of us speaks. And you have an unshakeable belief that future generations will understand that question in Kenglish rather than English.Well here is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of how the brain completely and utterly DISTORTS what I has been ACTUALLY SAID, and WRITTEN CLEARLY, for ALL to LOOK AT, and SEE.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm But we remain no closer to an explanation of how you know that future generations will adopt this quite inexplicable need for "I" to refer to the universe when some new word would be a more sane way to get there.BECAUSE Iiii has NEVER been a WORD EVERY USED BEFORE, that I am aware of anyway.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm You apparently have some reason for using "Theee" instead of 'the'', why not Iiii instead of 'I'?
You did you hopeless buffoon.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amWho, and/or what, EVER CLAIMED that they would?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm How do you know future generations wil adopt your particular choice of language conventions?
Future generations will FULLY understand thee 'I', of which there is ONLY One. You KNOW that 'I', which hitherto the days when this was being, 'you', human beings, STILL did NOT YET KNOW the, proper and correct, answer to the question, 'Who am 'I'?', correct?
Those are YOUR words!
So you confess to deliberately not answering clarifying questions now?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amBut I am PURPOSELY being, so called, "evasive" with 'you', "flashdangerpants". This is SO I can USE 'you' MORE the way that I WANT TO, to be completely Honest with 'you', "flashdangerpants".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pmYeah, you're a bit too evasive and bullshitty to be accusing me of dishonesty if I am to be completely honest with you Ken.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am When future generations will FULLY UNDERSTOOD is when they learn how to become Truly Honest and Truly OPEN, like 'you' ALL once were.
Explaining this to a species, and a generation, who are Truly CLOSED and Truly Dishonest, just takes some time. But, as I keep REMINDING you, there is NO RUSH. As ALL works out PERFECTLY, ANYWAY.
Also, you sound a lot like a psychopath again there.
Really? So you get your wisdom from a divine source huh?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amHave you EVER heard the expression; 'ONLY God KNOWS', before?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm And right now, what we have here is more evasion. The useful answer to "when will X happen?" is not "it will happen when it happens".
ONCE what I have been SAYING is FULLY UNDERSTOOD, then that expression will be FULLY UNDERSTOOD as well.
AGAIN, there is NO RUSH. Everything is moving according to thee PLAN, PERFECTLY.
Atla is doing really well today.
Are you telling us that when you predict what people in some distant future will know, will think, and will choose to do .... you are expressing the contents of some sort of prophetic vision?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amKNOWING.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm What is at question here is the nature of your prophecy. If it is not a matter of your personal belief, what is it?
Or, instinctual, or internal, KNOWING, if that is BETTER.
I know I am wearing trousers by looking at my butt, if I can't see it, there are trousers in the way.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amThe SAME WAY 'you' KNOW 'things'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm
No, how do you actually know Ken? Drop the mysticism act and tell us the truth.
How do 'you' ACTUALLY KNOW?
I know that my cat is hungry because he has a dinner roar to alert me to the fact.
I know that Julius Caesar is dead because history books confirm this.
When I Know stuff, there's ususally some way in which I can check.
If I thought that 700 years from now there would be an annual clebration of my works on Flash Danger Day and all the children up and down England would wear a special costume for it and recieve presents.... that wouldn't really be something I knew, it would be a delusional belief I held. That's what your thing seems to be right now. Are you OPEN to that posibility?
Re: A World Without Men?
it's what i said, you just totally fail to understand simple human language
so you are denying what you wrote one sentence earlierLOL
For ANY or ALL of 'you', human beings, who want to CLAIM that I BELIEVE ANY thing, then instead of just CLAIMING I do, PROVIDE the ACTUAL PROOF for YOUR CLAIM.
Re: A World Without Men?
So, ONCE AGAIN, you write ONE THING but mean a completely ANOTHER THING, and YET then CLAIM that 'I' am the STUPID ONE.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amFine, I guess the stupidity isn't an act.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amWell this was OBVIOUSLY NOT CLEAR. IF you had just said that "it is the previous post that you had written to this one", then that makes it VERY CLEAR.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm
Okay Ken, some of your stupidity must be play acting right? I posted the exact thing you asked for as one post, and then referenced it in the bext post with advice to scroll up to the post above. This Shit can't be beyond you.
As can be CLEARLY SEEN you NEVER "advised" " to scroll up to "the post above" ". You OBVIOUSLY just wrote: "Scroll up". Thus the very reason WHY I talked about how you did NOT provide LINKS nor EXACT POSITIONS.
Now you are being UNCLEAR AGAIN. Do you MEAN "this post" or a "previous post" you wrote?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm So THE EXACT POSITION is "two posts above this one"
And people wonder WHY they could NOT YET find thee ACTUAL Truth of things. The way people wrote, back in the days when this was being written, it is VERY OBVIOUS WHY they were STILL SO CONFUSED.
And what you see as, and call, "stupid shit" other people do NOT.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amYou do go on at length about some stupid shit Ken.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amThank you. FINALLY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm because you happened to have written a reply to somebody else between my two posts, that's where I answered your question in very precise and true terms.If you want to make a CLAIM that some 'thing' is some 'where', then it is BETTER for 'us' that you PROVIDE thee link, or the EXACT POSITION, to EXACTLY 'where' it is. And, EVEN BETTER, again, is you provide the ACTUAL WORDS that you are referring to.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm If you need a link, may I point you to the little blue up arrows besides our names in these things.
Yes I KNOW. But because I do NOT like to ASSUME ANY thing and because I am NO where near as SMART as 'you', people, here, I would NOT like to click on blue up arrows and end up in wrong posts, read wrong texts, and/or come to wrong conclusions. So, if you just PROVIDE the ACTUAL WORDS, then 'we' can LOOK AT EXACTLY 'that' what 'you' are REFERRING TO.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm Those are the links to the places that the quotes come from.
And YET you STILL have NOT YET worked out what was going on there.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am It was quite reasonable to expect somebody of basic average intelligence to get what was going on there.
You MISQUOTED me.
And, you STILL do NOT YET KNOW WHERE, correct?
Because it was OBVIOUSLY NOT WHERE you ASSUMED it was.
LOL I do NOT CARE ONE IOTA what you consider 'negative' nor 'positive'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amWell you see, just saying NO is negative.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amAND, I keep telling you NO.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 am Also, and by the way, you are, ONCE AGAIN, just MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING what I said you were MISQUOTING me about, anyway. The reason I said you MISQUOTED me is NOT because of what you provided I said, years ago, but because of the way you PLACED MISQUOTES.
Now, IF you had just ask for CLARIFICATION, BEFORE you JUMPED to an ASSUMPTION, and CONCLUSION, which ended up just being PLAIN Wrong, ONCE AGAIN, then we would NOT have, ONCE AGAIN, 'wasted so much time', ONCE MORE.
I have been requesting clarification on teh simple matter of whether you are predicting that persons in the yeart 2100 will be visiting this forum to learn about your grand wisdom.
What part of NO are you MISSING or DO NOT UNDERSTAND?
You ask the clarifying question. I give you the answer to THAT question, from MY perspective. How you then want to SEE that answer is of NO CONCERN, to me. In fact, the MORE Wrong you are in your perception, the MORE you are PROVING what I WILL SAY.
And, if NO is negative, and YES is positive, then this has ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING WHATSOEVER in regards to ANY thing here.
What MAKES you THINK that I was predicting some 'thing'?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am I'm looking for you to actually tell me what you were predicting with the words you made me quote exactly twice. and you are just not doing that.
I ANSWER the WORDS put IN FRONT of me.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You tell us to ask you clarifying question, but you don't deliver your end of the bargain.
If you do NOT like the ANSWERS, or if you find them, so called, "negative", then I suggest just CHANGING the questions you ask.
WHAT 'prediction'?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amI am under little illusion that asking you to actually clarify a clarifying question is a waste of time. I am totally open to you telling me when your prediction will come true though. Are you OPEN to actually doing that though?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amYou REALLY have NOT YET discovered the ABILITY, nor learned HOW, to just REMAIN OPEN, have you?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm Or will it be persons in the year 3500 who do so? That is not at all clear.
When, and IF you EVER do, then you will discover and SEE just how much 'waste of a time' you have spent here.
Well if I say I DO NOT, then WHY would ANY one ASSUME otherwise?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amOnly if it is true that DO NOT BELIEVE ANY "Things".Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amConsidering just how MANY TIMES that I INFORM 'you', human beings, that I do NOT BELIEVE this, or ANY thing, then SURELY it is NOT the latter, correct?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm I am looking for clarity over whether you are issuing the sort of god-chanelling vision FROM the future as Atla suspects, or are just telling us what you BELIEVE will be the case in the future.
Also, WHY did you use a capital 'T' with the 'things' word here?
Yes 'it' is True. But let us NOT forget what 'it' COULD BE.
WHY would I.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You won't clarify whether your prediction about future generations is knowledge, experience, memory or any of the other things it might be that aren't beliefs.
You are UNDER the DELUDED BELIEF that 'I have BELIEFS', and that I BELIEVE 'that'. So, then, to you, it would HAVE TO BE that one, correct?
LOL Just MORE PROOF that you are STUCK UNDER a DELUDED BELIEF.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am So it might be more true that you believe you don't believe things.
Just about EVERY clarifying question you have asked has a Wrong ASSUMPTION of yours entangled within them. So, UNTIL you FIX that ISSUE that you HAVE, then we can and WILL get around to CLARIFYING 'things'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am Perhaps if you get round to clarifying anything, we might clarify that at the same time.
LOL If you think or BELIEVE SO, But let us NOT FORGET that one would HAVE TO HAVE a 'prediction' FIRST, in order to be ABLE to do what you say here "sally".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amTell us what your prediction is actually a prediction of Ken. That's not a "closed" question.
How about you tell us what you prediction is actually a prediction of "flashdangerpants"?
Okay.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amI don't care about ignore buttons. When I'm busy I just ignore you by not bothering to read your posts.
NOFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amWell we didn't need to dig up an old quote about you getting all messianic and predicting future generations would value this forum for your wisdom did we?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 am
Your CLAIM here is Wrong, ONCE AGAIN.
LOOK AT the QUOTED section of MY ACTUAL WORDS, which you THANKFULLY PROVIDED for 'us' to LOOK AT and SEE. In there I ALREADY INFORMED that 'this' is NOT necessarily for 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written.
Did you MISS or MISUNDERSTAND this ALSO?
This, so called, 'riddle' is therefore NOT meant for 'you', "flashdangerpants". 'you', human beings, in the days when this was being written, still have some MORE EVOLVING to do BEFORE 'this' can be BETTER and/or FULLY UNDERSTOOD.
'you', "flashdangerpants", are JUST BEING USED, in order to gather and obtain ACTUAL PROOF, for future generations to be able to LOOK AT and SEE just how the Mind and the brain work, and at HOW the brain can be human beings worst enemy.
AND, we ALSO did NOT need you to express YOUR ASSUMPTIONS that are Wrong AGAIN, did we?
If you SAY and BELIEVE SO.
'I' have TOLD you, and thus IN-FORM-ED the 'you', ALREADY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am Who are the future generations Ken. WHEN are they Ken? HOW DO YOU KNOW?
YES.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You know that consistently boasting that you are using us as puppets for your own gratification marks you out as all the things Atla says you are by the way?
AND, the MORE of 'you' that MARK 'me' out to be some 'thing', and be some specific 'thing', then the BETTER this will end up WORKING OUT and BEING, for thee 'I'.
Well IF you had asked that from a Truly OPEN perspective, then you would NOT HAVE MISSED the POINT I was making.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amSo what?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 am
Oh okay, if you say so.
AND, who and/or what is the 'we', EXACTLY, which 'you' are referring to here?
If this is what YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE, then this MUST BE TRUE, correct?
Well here is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of how the brain completely and utterly DISTORTS what I has been ACTUALLY SAID, and WRITTEN CLEARLY, for ALL to LOOK AT, and SEE.
BECAUSE Iiii has NEVER been a WORD EVERY USED BEFORE, that I am aware of anyway.
To answer YOUR "So what?" here is that 'Iiii' is NOT a word used, whereas 'thee' OBVIOUSLY IS.
LOL "new meaning". What is the OLD MEANING for the word 'I' and what does the word 'I' refer to, EXACTLY, to you?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am My point is entirely valid, if you have some new meaning for the word "I", why not just use a new word?
Here is FURTHER PROOF of just how ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS can completely and utterly DISTORT and/or BLIND one to thee ACTUAL Truth of things.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amYou did you hopeless buffoon.
Future generations will FULLY understand thee 'I', of which there is ONLY One. You KNOW that 'I', which hitherto the days when this was being, 'you', human beings, STILL did NOT YET KNOW the, proper and correct, answer to the question, 'Who am 'I'?', correct?
Those are YOUR words!
There is NOTHING WHATSOEVER in THOSE WORDS, which SAY ANY thing about future generations adopting my particular choice of language conventions. In fact the EXACT OPPOSITE could be argued.
You REALLY are STILL a LONG WAY OFF from Truly understanding what being Truly OPEN ACTUALLY MEANS. There is NO wonder WHY you STILL keep MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING SO MUCH of what I SAY and WRITE.
NO.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amSo you confess to deliberately not answering clarifying questions now?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amBut I am PURPOSELY being, so called, "evasive" with 'you', "flashdangerpants". This is SO I can USE 'you' MORE the way that I WANT TO, to be completely Honest with 'you', "flashdangerpants".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm
Yeah, you're a bit too evasive and bullshitty to be accusing me of dishonesty if I am to be completely honest with you Ken.
WHY would you ASSUME such a thing?
GREAT, the MORE I am MARKED, the BETTER this is WORKING.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am Also, you sound a lot like a psychopath again there.
YES.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amReally?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amHave you EVER heard the expression; 'ONLY God KNOWS', before?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm And right now, what we have here is more evasion. The useful answer to "when will X happen?" is not "it will happen when it happens".
ONCE what I have been SAYING is FULLY UNDERSTOOD, then that expression will be FULLY UNDERSTOOD as well.
AGAIN, there is NO RUSH. Everything is moving according to thee PLAN, PERFECTLY.
What 'wisdom'?
If "atla" is RIGHT, then 'I' am a "psychotic IDIOT, with autism". So, OBVIOUSLY, I would be the LAST one here to have ANY 'wisdom', correct?
In regards to what, EXACTLY?
NOFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amAre you telling us that when you predict what people in some distant future will know, will think, and will choose to do .... you are expressing the contents of some sort of prophetic vision?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amKNOWING.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm What is at question here is the nature of your prophecy. If it is not a matter of your personal belief, what is it?
Or, instinctual, or internal, KNOWING, if that is BETTER.
I am TELLING you what I SAY here, with the ACTUAL WORDS that are CLEARLY written here, which can be CLEARLY SEEN.
What you ASSUME I am "telling you" has been SHOWN, and thus ALREADY PROVEN True, to be RARELY ever Right.
HOW can you CHECK some one known as "julius caesar" is, so called, "dead"? Do you BELIEVE EVERY thing you read in books, which are labeled and called "history books"?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amI know I am wearing trousers by looking at my butt, if I can't see it, there are trousers in the way.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 amThe SAME WAY 'you' KNOW 'things'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:08 pm
No, how do you actually know Ken? Drop the mysticism act and tell us the truth.
How do 'you' ACTUALLY KNOW?
I know that my cat is hungry because he has a dinner roar to alert me to the fact.
I know that Julius Caesar is dead because history books confirm this.
When I Know stuff, there's ususally some way in which I can check.
How do you KNOW that cat is "hungry"? You CLEARLY have a LOT of trouble READING and UNDERSTANDING CLEARLY written in the english language, so how do you KNOW cat language?
OBVIOUSLY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am If I thought that 700 years from now there would be an annual clebration of my works on Flash Danger Day and all the children up and down England would wear a special costume for it and recieve presents.... that wouldn't really be something I knew, it would be a delusional belief I held.
For ANY one to even think that I have been saying ANY thing like this, just SHOWS and PROVES how much peoples, in the days when this was being written, were completely and utterly DELUDED by their OWN made up ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS.
I KNEW I was MANIPULATING 'you', "flashdangerpants", to make up ASSUMPTIONS, but I NEVER KNEW that they would be as DELUDED as this on IS. Thank you for SHARING this with 'us'.
LOLFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am That's what your thing seems to be right now. Are you OPEN to that posibility?
What is 'my thing', EXACTLY, which you are referring to here?
By asking CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, from a Truly OPEN perspective, which I have just PROVIDED an EXAMPLE OF, SHOWS that I am OPEN, to ALL possibilities.
Re: A World Without Men?
Re: A World Without Men?
As PROVEN, all Age has are lies and delusions. And future generations will never read anything you wrote. Go pretend you're God all you want, live a miserable life and die alone.
Re: A World Without Men?
What, EXACTLY, has, supposedly and allegedly, "proven" that ALL I HAVE are LIES and DELUSIONS?
Okay.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: A World Without Men?
What I said was that you cannot possibly be as stupid as you seem. But I am big enough to admit that I was wrong in this matter.
Ok, where was it?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amAnd YET you STILL have NOT YET worked out what was going on there.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am It was quite reasonable to expect somebody of basic average intelligence to get what was going on there.
You MISQUOTED me.
And, you STILL do NOT YET KNOW WHERE, correct?
Because it was OBVIOUSLY NOT WHERE you ASSUMED it was.
Are you admitting to withholding potential clarity when answering "CLAriFYinG qUEstiONs" Ken?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amLOL I do NOT CARE ONE IOTA what you consider 'negative' nor 'positive'.
You ask the clarifying question. I give you the answer to THAT question, from MY perspective. How you then want to SEE that answer is of NO CONCERN, to me. In fact, the MORE Wrong you are in your perception, the MORE you are PROVING what I WILL SAY.
And, if NO is negative, and YES is positive, then this has ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING WHATSOEVER in regards to ANY thing here.
You keep telling is about things future generations are going to do Ken. What is that if not prediction?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amWhat MAKES you THINK that I was predicting some 'thing'?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am I'm looking for you to actually tell me what you were predicting with the words you made me quote exactly twice. and you are just not doing that.
Nothing works to get a straight answer out of you. You are crooked and you speak with forked tongue.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amI ANSWER the WORDS put IN FRONT of me.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You tell us to ask you clarifying question, but you don't deliver your end of the bargain.
If you do NOT like the ANSWERS, or if you find them, so called, "negative", then I suggest just CHANGING the questions you ask.
The same one as the last 20 questions Ken.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amWHAT 'prediction'?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amI am under little illusion that asking you to actually clarify a clarifying question is a waste of time. I am totally open to you telling me when your prediction will come true though. Are you OPEN to actually doing that though?
You are deomnstarably unreliable, so there's not much point assuming you can tell belief from truth.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amWell if I say I DO NOT, then WHY would ANY one ASSUME otherwise?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amOnly if it is true that DO NOT BELIEVE ANY "Things".
That sentence is gibberish in English, are you speaking a private language again?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amYes 'it' is True. But let us NOT forget what 'it' COULD BE.
WHY would I.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You won't clarify whether your prediction about future generations is knowledge, experience, memory or any of the other things it might be that aren't beliefs.
You are UNDER the DELUDED BELIEF that 'I have BELIEFS', and that I BELIEVE 'that'. So, then, to you, it would HAVE TO BE that one, correct?
I have been asking you to explain some basic stuff about your claim that future generations will read your words and UNDERSTAND COMPLETELY.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amLOL Just MORE PROOF that you are STUCK UNDER a DELUDED BELIEF.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am So it might be more true that you believe you don't believe things.
Just about EVERY clarifying question you have asked has a Wrong ASSUMPTION of yours entangled within them. So, UNTIL you FIX that ISSUE that you HAVE, then we can and WILL get around to CLARIFYING 'things'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am Perhaps if you get round to clarifying anything, we might clarify that at the same time.
You can circumvent my faulty assumptions by jet telling us what you know and how you know it.
I really don't understand what you are writing there Ken. You have a prediction, prohpecy, or some sort of experience of the future in which your wisdom is appreciated in ways it isn't now. You have repeatedly told me and others that there is a PLAN that is unfolding and even that "Everything is moving according to thee PLAN, PERFECTLY." So you have some future occurence that you are expecting. Tell us more about it please.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amLOL If you think or BELIEVE SO, But let us NOT FORGET that one would HAVE TO HAVE a 'prediction' FIRST, in order to be ABLE to do what you say here "sally".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amTell us what your prediction is actually a prediction of Ken. That's not a "closed" question.
How about you tell us what you prediction is actually a prediction of "flashdangerpants"?
Whatever. That was another prediction you made about future generations.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amNOFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amWell we didn't need to dig up an old quote about you getting all messianic and predicting future generations would value this forum for your wisdom did we?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 am
Your CLAIM here is Wrong, ONCE AGAIN.
LOOK AT the QUOTED section of MY ACTUAL WORDS, which you THANKFULLY PROVIDED for 'us' to LOOK AT and SEE. In there I ALREADY INFORMED that 'this' is NOT necessarily for 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written.
Did you MISS or MISUNDERSTAND this ALSO?
This, so called, 'riddle' is therefore NOT meant for 'you', "flashdangerpants". 'you', human beings, in the days when this was being written, still have some MORE EVOLVING to do BEFORE 'this' can be BETTER and/or FULLY UNDERSTOOD.
'you', "flashdangerpants", are JUST BEING USED, in order to gather and obtain ACTUAL PROOF, for future generations to be able to LOOK AT and SEE just how the Mind and the brain work, and at HOW the brain can be human beings worst enemy.
AND, we ALSO did NOT need you to express YOUR ASSUMPTIONS that are Wrong AGAIN, did we?
And that was more of the messianic stuff. But you are still witholding all of the information who will be fully understanding your special Kenglish and when. Teh unkind would suggest that you have no idea and nothing to actually offer.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amIf you SAY and BELIEVE SO.'I' have TOLD you, and thus IN-FORM-ED the 'you', ALREADY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am Who are the future generations Ken. WHEN are they Ken? HOW DO YOU KNOW?YES.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You know that consistently boasting that you are using us as puppets for your own gratification marks you out as all the things Atla says you are by the way?
AND, the MORE of 'you' that MARK 'me' out to be some 'thing', and be some specific 'thing', then the BETTER this will end up WORKING OUT and BEING, for thee 'I'.
What is that "IN-FORM-ED" shit meant to mean by the way?
I use the word I the same way every speaker of the English language does. It's only in Kenglish that it has some precisely opposite meanging and switches from being the personal pronoun to some universe-of-one-mind bullshit.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amWell IF you had asked that from a Truly OPEN perspective, then you would NOT HAVE MISSED the POINT I was making.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amSo what?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:26 am
Oh okay, if you say so.
AND, who and/or what is the 'we', EXACTLY, which 'you' are referring to here?
If this is what YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE, then this MUST BE TRUE, correct?
Well here is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of how the brain completely and utterly DISTORTS what I has been ACTUALLY SAID, and WRITTEN CLEARLY, for ALL to LOOK AT, and SEE.
BECAUSE Iiii has NEVER been a WORD EVERY USED BEFORE, that I am aware of anyway.
To answer YOUR "So what?" here is that 'Iiii' is NOT a word used, whereas 'thee' OBVIOUSLY IS.
LOL "new meaning". What is the OLD MEANING for the word 'I' and what does the word 'I' refer to, EXACTLY, to you?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am My point is entirely valid, if you have some new meaning for the word "I", why not just use a new word?
You should just get over yourself and make up your own word.
You don't offer anything positive to tell us how to understand what you write. You just go round and round telling people not to be wrong about your unintelligible shit.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amHere is FURTHER PROOF of just how ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS can completely and utterly DISTORT and/or BLIND one to thee ACTUAL Truth of things.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amYou did you hopeless buffoon.
Future generations will FULLY understand thee 'I', of which there is ONLY One. You KNOW that 'I', which hitherto the days when this was being, 'you', human beings, STILL did NOT YET KNOW the, proper and correct, answer to the question, 'Who am 'I'?', correct?
Those are YOUR words!
There is NOTHING WHATSOEVER in THOSE WORDS, which SAY ANY thing about future generations adopting my particular choice of language conventions. In fact the EXACT OPPOSITE could be argued.
You REALLY are STILL a LONG WAY OFF from Truly understanding what being Truly OPEN ACTUALLY MEANS. There is NO wonder WHY you STILL keep MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING SO MUCH of what I SAY and WRITE.
But you did write "Future generations will FULLY understand thee 'I'" so anyone who doesn't speak Kenglish will understand that the same way I do and some actual clarity from you wouldn't be an unfair request.
Becasue you wrote "But I am PURPOSELY being, so called, "evasive" with 'you', "flashdangerpants"."Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amNO.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amSo you confess to deliberately not answering clarifying questions now?
WHY would you ASSUME such a thing?
Was it foretold in the before-before that the saviour of mankind would be mocked in his own lifetime?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amGREAT, the MORE I am MARKED, the BETTER this is WORKING.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am Also, you sound a lot like a psychopath again there.
Dude you just did an "only God knows" routine to explain your own superiority. Atla has you pretty much worked out right down to the God-channeling stuff.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amYES.What 'wisdom'?
If "atla" is RIGHT, then 'I' am a "psychotic IDIOT, with autism". So, OBVIOUSLY, I would be the LAST one here to have ANY 'wisdom', correct?In regards to what, EXACTLY?
Am I wrong though? You deny everything, but your counter explanations are always quite insane.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amNOFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amAre you telling us that when you predict what people in some distant future will know, will think, and will choose to do .... you are expressing the contents of some sort of prophetic vision?
I am TELLING you what I SAY here, with the ACTUAL WORDS that are CLEARLY written here, which can be CLEARLY SEEN.
What you ASSUME I am "telling you" has been SHOWN, and thus ALREADY PROVEN True, to be RARELY ever Right.
You just told me that you KNOW what is going to happen in the future, but your explanation for how you know is just that you know.
I can direct you to some pretty good philosophy books if you want to study epistemology all of a sudden Ken. I can't promise you have the talent to read them though. My own take would be a combination of what Rorty says in the mirror of nature and Wittgenstein in the philosophical investigations / on certainty. My prediction is that trying to explain to you would be a giant waste of my time, this is based on prior experience.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amHOW can you CHECK some one known as "julius caesar" is, so called, "dead"? Do you BELIEVE EVERY thing you read in books, which are labeled and called "history books"?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 amI know I am wearing trousers by looking at my butt, if I can't see it, there are trousers in the way.
I know that my cat is hungry because he has a dinner roar to alert me to the fact.
I know that Julius Caesar is dead because history books confirm this.
When I Know stuff, there's ususally some way in which I can check.
How do you KNOW that cat is "hungry"? You CLEARLY have a LOT of trouble READING and UNDERSTANDING CLEARLY written in the english language, so how do you KNOW cat language?
Uh-huh. Pretty big ego you got going on there fella.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amOBVIOUSLY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am If I thought that 700 years from now there would be an annual clebration of my works on Flash Danger Day and all the children up and down England would wear a special costume for it and recieve presents.... that wouldn't really be something I knew, it would be a delusional belief I held.
For ANY one to even think that I have been saying ANY thing like this, just SHOWS and PROVES how much peoples, in the days when this was being written, were completely and utterly DELUDED by their OWN made up ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS.
I KNEW I was MANIPULATING 'you', "flashdangerpants", to make up ASSUMPTIONS, but I NEVER KNEW that they would be as DELUDED as this on IS. Thank you for SHARING this with 'us'.
If only you open to the much simpler possibility of just not chopping simple paragraphs up and pretending the sentences are unrelated to the one another, you might acheive competence in reading and comprehension.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amLOLFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am That's what your thing seems to be right now. Are you OPEN to that posibility?
What is 'my thing', EXACTLY, which you are referring to here?
By asking CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, from a Truly OPEN perspective, which I have just PROVIDED an EXAMPLE OF, SHOWS that I am OPEN, to ALL possibilities.
Re: A World Without Men?
That has never happened, but you clearly believe it will in the future. You are welcome to your Kenglish word 'believe', but whatever that means, it doesn't mean that in English. As you keep reminding us, there once was a broad consensus that the Earth was in the centre of the universe. In your version ancient and medieval people came "to the EXACT SAME FINDINGS", which if your thesis were correct would mean 'we KNOW, FOR SURE, that they were obtaining thee ACTUAL Truth of things'.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 12:53 amFirstly, I do NOT believe ANY thing. WHEN will you AGREE with and ACCEPT this? You OBVIOUSLY could NOT refute this CLAIM, so just continually writing that I believe 'things' is just a complete and utter 'waste of time', as some say.
Secondly, the WHOLE POINT of ALLOWING 'you' to find thee ACTUAL Truth for, and by, "yourself", is so that IF people are coming to the EXACT SAME FINDINGS, then we KNOW, FOR SURE, that we are obtaining thee ACTUAL Truth of things.
That way lies groupspeak. Argumentum ad populum is not a guide to truth.
Re: A World Without Men?
LOL You, ONCE AGAIN, completely and utterly MISSED or MISUNDERSTOOD what I was ACTUALLY REFERRING TO.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amWhat I said was that you cannot possibly be as stupid as you seem. But I am big enough to admit that I was wrong in this matter.
I was NOT referring to YOUR COMMENT about how stupid 'I' AM. We ALL KNOW that 'you' BELIEVE thee 'I' could NOT get ANY MORE STUPID.
I was just POINTING OUT that when you wrote: " two posts above "this one" ", you were completely and utterly Wrong. So, you wrote ONE THING, BUT what you ACTUALLY MEANT was a complete OTHER THING.
And, in the post, which you are replying to here, I was just POINTING OUT that, ONCE AGAIN. But, now this is the THIRD TIME, which you probably STILL will NOT YET have worked out.
But, YET 'I' am MEANT to be the STUPID ONE here, according to 'you'.
Also, if you are "big enough" to admit that you were wrong and that ACTUALLY 'I' can be AS STUPID as 'I' seem to 'you', then we WAIT to SEE if you have worked out what has ACTUALLY been going on and OCCURRING here.
WOW, IMAGINE if you ASKED this from the outset how much time we would NOT have wasted.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amOk, where was it?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amAnd YET you STILL have NOT YET worked out what was going on there.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am It was quite reasonable to expect somebody of basic average intelligence to get what was going on there.
You MISQUOTED me.
And, you STILL do NOT YET KNOW WHERE, correct?
Because it was OBVIOUSLY NOT WHERE you ASSUMED it was.
Where you MISQUOTED me was WHERE you wrote what I said, under your name. So, do you now get what was going on here?
Here is a hint, what was ACTUALLY going on here is NOTHING what you thought NOR IMAGINED.
NO. People who are Truly OPEN can SEE CLEARLY.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amAre you admitting to withholding potential clarity when answering "CLAriFYinG qUEstiONs" Ken?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amLOL I do NOT CARE ONE IOTA what you consider 'negative' nor 'positive'.
You ask the clarifying question. I give you the answer to THAT question, from MY perspective. How you then want to SEE that answer is of NO CONCERN, to me. In fact, the MORE Wrong you are in your perception, the MORE you are PROVING what I WILL SAY.
And, if NO is negative, and YES is positive, then this has ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING WHATSOEVER in regards to ANY thing here.
And you can, ONCE AGAIN, 'go for your life' and CLAIM that that ANSWER is, so called, "negative".
By the way, WHY do you write "CLAriFYinG qUEstiONs" like this?
I asked you that CLARIFYING QUESTION BECAUSE I KNEW that YOUR FUTURE ANSWER would PROVIDE thee ANSWER to the CLAriFYinG qUEstiON that you asked me.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amYou keep telling is about things future generations are going to do Ken. What is that if not prediction?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amWhat MAKES you THINK that I was predicting some 'thing'?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am I'm looking for you to actually tell me what you were predicting with the words you made me quote exactly twice. and you are just not doing that.
SO, IF I KEEP TELLING you about things future generations ARE GOING TO DO, then that would be OBVIOUSLY BE what "I am predicting", correct?
If yes, then YOUR OWN QUESTION, ANSWERED, ALREADY. As I have been telling you.
If this is what you BELIEVE, then this MUST BE ONLY what I can do, from YOUR perspective of things.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amNothing works to get a straight answer out of you. You are crooked and you speak with forked tongue.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amI ANSWER the WORDS put IN FRONT of me.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You tell us to ask you clarifying question, but you don't deliver your end of the bargain.
If you do NOT like the ANSWERS, or if you find them, so called, "negative", then I suggest just CHANGING the questions you ask.
So, you DID ALREADY KNOW what the, so called, "prediction" IS, which you keep asking me to tell you what 'it' IS.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amThe same one as the last 20 questions Ken.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amWHAT 'prediction'?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am
I am under little illusion that asking you to actually clarify a clarifying question is a waste of time. I am totally open to you telling me when your prediction will come true though. Are you OPEN to actually doing that though?
Okay, you are FREE to ASSUME absolutely ANY thing you like.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amYou are deomnstarably unreliable, so there's not much point assuming you can tell belief from truth.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amWell if I say I DO NOT, then WHY would ANY one ASSUME otherwise?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am
Only if it is true that DO NOT BELIEVE ANY "Things".
But what I NOTICED is that you completely LEFT OUT ANOTHER CLARIFYING QUESTION here that I asked you, which was: WHY did you use a capital 'T' with the 'things' word here?
And it will REMAIN 'gibberish' to you for as long as you NEVER seek CLARIFICATION.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amThat sentence is gibberish in English, are you speaking a private language again?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amYes 'it' is True. But let us NOT forget what 'it' COULD BE.
WHY would I.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am You won't clarify whether your prediction about future generations is knowledge, experience, memory or any of the other things it might be that aren't beliefs.
You are UNDER the DELUDED BELIEF that 'I have BELIEFS', and that I BELIEVE 'that'. So, then, to you, it would HAVE TO BE that one, correct?
What I KNOW IS;FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amI have been asking you to explain some basic stuff about your claim that future generations will read your words and UNDERSTAND COMPLETELY.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amLOL Just MORE PROOF that you are STUCK UNDER a DELUDED BELIEF.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am So it might be more true that you believe you don't believe things.
Just about EVERY clarifying question you have asked has a Wrong ASSUMPTION of yours entangled within them. So, UNTIL you FIX that ISSUE that you HAVE, then we can and WILL get around to CLARIFYING 'things'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am Perhaps if you get round to clarifying anything, we might clarify that at the same time.
You can circumvent my faulty assumptions by jet telling us what you know and how you know it.
As future generations come to gain True understanding, itself, then they will become MORE CURIOS.
How I KNOW THIS;
Is because of how thee Mind and the brain work.
Fair enough, you have NOT really been able to understand just about ANY thing I have been writing so far, so you really NOT understanding what I am writing here is of NO surprise AT ALL.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amI really don't understand what you are writing there Ken.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 amLOL If you think or BELIEVE SO, But let us NOT FORGET that one would HAVE TO HAVE a 'prediction' FIRST, in order to be ABLE to do what you say here "sally".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 3:16 am
Tell us what your prediction is actually a prediction of Ken. That's not a "closed" question.
How about you tell us what you prediction is actually a prediction of "flashdangerpants"?
And, let us NOT forget that what I am writing here is NOT necessarily for 'you', "flashdangerpants" to understand.
AGAIN, you are Wrong.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am You have a prediction, prohpecy, or some sort of experience of the future in which your wisdom is appreciated in ways it isn't now.
And, contrary to what you think or believe it is NOT up to ME to circumvent YOUR faulty assumptions.
I have ALREADY INFORMED you of HOW to SEE the ACTUAL Truth of things.
One day, soon enough, people will learn how it is ACTUALLY possible to live in Peace and Harmony with one "another".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am You have repeatedly told me and others that there is a PLAN that is unfolding and even that "Everything is moving according to thee PLAN, PERFECTLY." So you have some future occurence that you are expecting. Tell us more about it please.
Oh, and by the way, I am NOT expecting this. I am ACHIEVING this.
So, does this mean that you do NOT like being informed when you are Wrong?
LOL NO it was NOT.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am That was another prediction you made about future generations.
ONCE AGAIN, once you rid "yourself" the ASSUMPTIONS, then you will NOT be SO Wrong, SO OFTEN, and then you will ask CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, which WILL result in you getting what you call 'positive'.
If you say so.
Do you NOT like what you call "the messianic stuff"?
Yes I KNOW.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am But you are still witholding all of the information who will be fully understanding your special Kenglish and when.
I have been SAYING this all along.
Also, thank you for NOTICING as well.
GREAT. This works MORE in My FAVOR.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am Teh unkind would suggest that you have no idea and nothing to actually offer.
The kind WILL say that that is NOT "shit".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am What is that "IN-FORM-ED" shit meant to mean by the way?
EVERY thing has form.
Besides thee One Thing, EVERY thing else was created, and EVERY thing is continually forming, including 'you'.
By the way thee One Thing, or Creator, works It is FORMING EVERY thing, including 'you'.
ALL the necessarily INFORMATION to live a Truly Peaceful and Harmonious life, with EVERY one, is ALREADY WITHIN 'you', FORMING 'you'.
This within-form-ation, which is FORMING 'you' ALREADY ANYWAY, and which is just STILL UNCONSCIOUSLY KNOWN, by 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written, is thee FORMATION appearing BEFORE 'you'. But which will be FULLY REVEALED, soon enough.
Future generations when FULLY INFORMED, and thus FORMED, with-in, WILL come to KNOW, consciously, what has been occurring here, all along.
LOL So, you BELIEVE you KNOW EXACTLY the MEANING of the word 'I' that EVERY human being who speaks the english language uses. And, here 'you' are accusing 'I' of talking "messianic stuff".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amI use the word I the same way every speaker of the English language does.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 am
Well IF you had asked that from a Truly OPEN perspective, then you would NOT HAVE MISSED the POINT I was making.
To answer YOUR "So what?" here is that 'Iiii' is NOT a word used, whereas 'thee' OBVIOUSLY IS.
LOL "new meaning". What is the OLD MEANING for the word 'I' and what does the word 'I' refer to, EXACTLY, to you?
How do 'you', "flashdangerpants", KNOW what the SAME USAGE of the 'I' word IS, for EVERY human being of the english speaking language?
Oh, and by the way, what WAY do you and EVERY one of those "other" peoples USE the word 'I', EXACTLY?
You ARE, ONCE AGAIN, Wrong.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am It's only in Kenglish that it has some precisely opposite meanging and switches from being the personal pronoun to some universe-of-one-mind bullshit.
I REALLY do suggest you CLARIFY, BEFORE you ASSUME.
'you', "flashdangerpants", are PROVING to be of high importance here in your regular PROOF of WHY it is completely and utterly Wrong to ASSUME ANY thing.
Make up my own word for what, EXACTLY?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am You should just get over yourself and make up your own word.
BECAUSE these writings are NOT necessarily for 'you' AT ALL.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amYou don't offer anything positive to tell us how to understand what you write.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 am
Here is FURTHER PROOF of just how ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS can completely and utterly DISTORT and/or BLIND one to thee ACTUAL Truth of things.
There is NOTHING WHATSOEVER in THOSE WORDS, which SAY ANY thing about future generations adopting my particular choice of language conventions. In fact the EXACT OPPOSITE could be argued.
You REALLY are STILL a LONG WAY OFF from Truly understanding what being Truly OPEN ACTUALLY MEANS. There is NO wonder WHY you STILL keep MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING SO MUCH of what I SAY and WRITE.
These writings are for a particular type of person.
But I NEVER tell 'you', people, not to be wrong. In fact I have been encouraging it. As can be CLEARLY SEEN.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am You just go round and round telling people not to be wrong about your unintelligible shit.
And, I have been telling 'you', people, that you ARE Wrong, and NOT 'not to be wrong'.
You REALLY do NEED to get rid of this continual ASSUMING, that is; if you REALLY do want to start learning AND understanding MORE about thee Universe, Itself, and thee ACTUAL Truth of 'things'.
And they WILL, when I learn how to communicate better HOW you ALL can FIND and SEE thee ACTUAL Truth of 'things for, and by, "yourselves".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am But you did write "Future generations will FULLY understand thee 'I'" so anyone who doesn't speak Kenglish will understand that the same way I do and some actual clarity from you wouldn't be an unfair request.
See, what is happening and occurring now, in the days when this is being written, is 'you', adult human beings, ASSUME and BELIEVE 'you' ALREADY KNOW what the truth of 'things' ARE. But ACTUALLY 'you' still have quite a LOT MORE to learn in this regard.
To save you some "time", BEFORE you ask me a CLARIFYING QUESTION I suggest you ask "yourself", "Is this even possible?"FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amBecasue you wrote "But I am PURPOSELY being, so called, "evasive" with 'you', "flashdangerpants"."
Was it foretold in the before-before that the saviour of mankind would be mocked in his own lifetime?
If yes, then ask "yourself", "Can I ask 'this' in another way, which is from a Truly OPEN perspective?"
AND THEN, DECIDE if the question is worth asking or not.
BUT I have NO 'superiority'.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amDude you just did an "only God knows" routine to explain your own superiority.
WHERE did this RIDICULOUS and ABSURD ASSUMPTION come from?
Okay. So is ALL settled now?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am Atla has you pretty much worked out right down to the God-channeling stuff.
Sometimes Yes.
Is this ABSOLUTELY and IRREFUTABLY TRUE, to you?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am You deny everything, but your counter explanations are always quite insane.
Okay.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am You just told me that you KNOW what is going to happen in the future, but your explanation for how you know is just that you know.
Am 'I' obliged, to 'you'?
But what has this got to do with HOW you can CHECK or KNOW what I QUESTIONED you about here?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amI can direct you to some pretty good philosophy books if you want to study epistemology all of a sudden Ken.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 am
HOW can you CHECK some one known as "julius caesar" is, so called, "dead"? Do you BELIEVE EVERY thing you read in books, which are labeled and called "history books"?
How do you KNOW that cat is "hungry"? You CLEARLY have a LOT of trouble READING and UNDERSTANDING CLEARLY written in the english language, so how do you KNOW cat language?
Or, are you just 'trying to' DEFLECT from answering CLARIFYING QUESTIONS posed to you, ONCE AGAIN?
Okay, but considering you ARE GOING SO FAR OFF TRACK, let us just IGNORE this? After all staying on 'this' track would just be "a giant waste of your time" anyway, correct?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am I can't promise you have the talent to read them though. My own take would be a combination of what Rorty says in the mirror of nature and Wittgenstein in the philosophical investigations / on certainty. My prediction is that trying to explain to you would be a giant waste of my time, this is based on prior experience.
If you SAY and BELIEVE SO, then it MUST BE SO.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amUh-huh. Pretty big ego you got going on there fella.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:43 am
OBVIOUSLY.
For ANY one to even think that I have been saying ANY thing like this, just SHOWS and PROVES how much peoples, in the days when this was being written, were completely and utterly DELUDED by their OWN made up ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS.
I KNEW I was MANIPULATING 'you', "flashdangerpants", to make up ASSUMPTIONS, but I NEVER KNEW that they would be as DELUDED as this on IS. Thank you for SHARING this with 'us'.
Okay. If you BELIEVE SO. That is your thing after all.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 amIf only you open to the much simpler possibility of just not chopping simple paragraphs up and pretending the sentences are unrelated to the one another, you might acheive competence in reading and comprehension.
Re: A World Without Men?
I KNOW. We are still in the process of making this happen.uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:04 amThat has never happened,Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 12:53 amFirstly, I do NOT believe ANY thing. WHEN will you AGREE with and ACCEPT this? You OBVIOUSLY could NOT refute this CLAIM, so just continually writing that I believe 'things' is just a complete and utter 'waste of time', as some say.
Secondly, the WHOLE POINT of ALLOWING 'you' to find thee ACTUAL Truth for, and by, "yourself", is so that IF people are coming to the EXACT SAME FINDINGS, then we KNOW, FOR SURE, that we are obtaining thee ACTUAL Truth of things.
Also, a TREMENDOUS AMOUNT of things have NEVER happened, that is; until THEY DO?
LOL You are just wasting your time, AGAIN.
LOL Considering the FACT that I obtained the meaning from english dictionaries, then this says a GREAT DEAL about your ABILITY to continually ASSUME, Wrongly.
Except you seem to have FORGOTTEN that it is 'you', people, in the days when this was being written, who are the ancient peoples.uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:04 am As you keep reminding us, there once was a broad consensus that the Earth was in the centre of the universe. In your version ancient and medieval people came "to the EXACT SAME FINDINGS", which if your thesis were correct would mean 'we KNOW, FOR SURE, that they were obtaining thee ACTUAL Truth of things'.
LOL Here we have ANOTHER ONE is NOT YET CAPABLE to SEE PAST this fallacy.
Just so that you are AWARE, what thee ACTUAL Truth IS here is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you currently BELIEVE is true.
Now, if 'truth' is NOT depended upon, what you call, "groupspeak", then what, EXACTLY, is 'truth' depended upon?
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: A World Without Men?
Well, you might be expecting to acheive it, but until you have actually done so, it is just a belief.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 12:54 pmOne day, soon enough, people will learn how it is ACTUALLY possible to live in Peace and Harmony with one "another".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:34 am You have repeatedly told me and others that there is a PLAN that is unfolding and even that "Everything is moving according to thee PLAN, PERFECTLY." So you have some future occurence that you are expecting. Tell us more about it please.
Oh, and by the way, I am NOT expecting this. I am ACHIEVING this.
A messianic belief about you being the saviour of humanity.