nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pm
It is
thoroughly absurd that Judaism/Christianity/Islam would espouse to any god lacking the principle characteristics of the creator-god of Genesis: as having an
image and a
likeness as embodied by a
male Adam and a
female Eve.
The Hebrew word for 'GOD' - אלהים - is a composite of two words flanking either end of the letter
hei ה:
אל - 'el' - towardness
ה - 'oh' - conduit
ים - 'im' - sea/expanse (ie. creation)
Creation through Unity.
The Creation of living together as One is moving towards Unity in Peace and Harmony. (painfully slow I might add).
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmthus effectively a
folded circle with two poles: bestowal and reception, as defined in Genesis 1:3
And saying GOD <-*both bestowal/reception viz. shared will between two
'Let light be,' <-*bestowal / Adam / image
and light was. <-*reception / Eve / likeness
and observing the male/image and female/likeness potential in the name:
EVERY thing is Created because of two things coming together. EVERY thing created is because two United.
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmI am <-*male/bestowal
that <-*shared 'that'
I am <-*female/reception
makes for the archetypal Adam and Eve.
The female of a species has to be receptive of 'that' what is shared by the male, that is; in order to procreate.
adam and eve is also a story about evolution. eve FROM adam. adam FROM earth. EVERY thing FROM some thing prior.
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmHowever, in observing Judaism/Christianity/Islam:
i. J, E, P, D and R authorship of Torah purporting two rivaling deities of YHVH / Elohim causing Israel/Judah political divide.
ii. Christianity erects idol Jesus as "mercy upon mankind" with little/no focus on feminine aspect of Deity, kills "unbelievers".
iii. Islam erects idol Muhammad "mercy upon mankind" which erodes the 1:1 balance in favor of infidelity, kills "unbelievers".
This is just because these were written in times when things were seen differently.
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmrespectively, none of these ideological 'states' seem to even mildly regard the likeness/feminine aspect of Deity, but rather exude patriarchal
swinery and domination/abuse of/over
women.
Because in those times, when that was written, those of the male gender actually thought and BELIEVED that they were more superior than the female gendered ones.
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmThis degradation of women culminates into the
latter which invariably carries in it the original sin: man blaming the woman and scapegoating his own iniquity onto her.
But what was the "original sin" before this one?
eve took of some thing that was KNOWN to be WRONG.
And then, they BOTH blamed some thing else for their WRONG behaviors.
'original sin' means MISSING THE MARK.
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmThis is precisely what the hijab/niqab/burqa are in Islam; the women are solely blamed for "causing" men to act terribly, despite the fault owing solely to the men.
And All of this could also be SEEN as human beings 'trying to' attempt to blame some thing else (religion) for their own WRONG doings now.
Just ask ANY adult human being WHY they do WRONG? IF one could be found to admit they do WRONG, then the very next line from them, would more than likely be in reference to how some thing ELSE caused them to behave that way.
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmImage
invariably relies on likeness (and vice versa). It takes the image (ie. particle) to trace/produce the likeness (ie. wave) and they are both expressions of one another.
But the ONLY way the image can rely on the likeness of some thing that is not visible to the human eyes is in being illustrated through speech or writings.
nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 pmThat a 1:1 'state' could erode into something like Islam speaks to the incomprehensible depths of the
evilness of the
believing man (not woman), and in the same way it takes a believer to believer
evil is good, it takes a believer to believe
swine is human.
And it takes a BELIEVER to be CLOSED to thee actual Truth of things.
Texts written thousands of years ago where written BY and FROM the so called "man" who BELIEVED that they were above the so called "woman". Obviously, human beings can STILL BELIEVE things, in the days of when this is written, which are obviously NOT at all true. But things change, although way too slowly it seems to appear.
Some of 'you', human beings, in the days of when this is written, STILL refer to God as a "he" and still think "men" are above "women". Some Truths just take much longer to come to light to some, than other things truths do.
Obviously ABSOLUTELY EVERY thing was created or IS because of two prior things coming together. In a sense, it could be said when two opposites are 'married' or unite together they create One. One of the opposites just being referenced by the word "man" and the other opposite just being reference by the word "woman". So, for ABSOLUTELY EVERY thing, which IS ALREADY Created it is because of the coming together of two things. A created 'human' is solely because of a 'woman' AND a 'man' literally coming together.
Besides the sexual organs, ALL human beings are EQUAL and the EXACT SAME.