Explain how?Dontaskme wrote:You're interpretation of what I choose to discuss and the context in which I choose to express it is totally off the mark, …
And I am just putting my direct experience to you.But hey ho, it's my personal direct experience I'm talking about here, and it's clear that my direct experience is something you yourself do not resonate with, so what can I do about that. I'm simply describing it here. …
Critique is not criticising and if you don't understand this then you, like Bill, should not be on a philosophy forum.The intelligent consciousness that Bill and I operate from understands that criticizing other peoples direct experiences is just a silly occupation of the under developed un-evolved petty mind that loves to play games/ Quite frankly, we are no longer interested in such trifling activity. …
But it still appears to hold unfounded prejudices eh!Conscious evolution is about real philosophy, one that is now rising above the old boys network mind-set. That old school mentality has long been shed in this one here. …
What is this 'old boys network mind-set' that you talk about?
What 'old school' are you talking about? It can't be Philosophy as I doubt you've bothered to read anything that Western Philosophy has said over the past centuries.
Exactly, you are dead and there is no witness anymore but we can notice death, have you never been with a dead thing then?It's not a fact, it's a belief, the truth is, you have never known death. You would have to be there in death itself to know you have died, this is impossible since that would require two of you, one to be dead, and the other to witness that death. …
So you don't believe you will die? What do you think will happen to you after you are dead then?Death is one of the biggest lies you have ever fallen for hook line and sinker. …
All contradictions so always false. Non-existence means not in existence, not not in existence but existing elsewhere in a 'non-existence'.I mean non-existence means existence, for existence can never not be existence can it? but what meaning does any concept have without relating it is to something else? Non-existence is existence, full stop, just as Non-duality is duality, just as Non-violence is violence. …
If 'Existence IS' then it is a thing and as such there is a thing existing?Existence IS..but there is no 'thing' existing.That's what I mean.
Okay, tell me what you think has happened to the dead things you have encountered?I don't know, I've never died. …
Well not that difficult if you and Bill are examples of 'enlightened masters' but I'm really not trying to be superior I'm just asking you questions about what you say as for all I know you might actually, like the Buddha, have some techniques that would be useful.The only psychological need going on in this discussion if your insistence to feel superior in the presence of the enlightened masters. …
I apologise for that, I took umbrage at being told I would be nothing.You project your feelings onto others, like the time you accused me of not liking myself. …
I based my opinion upon what you have said about your life and the feelings that led you to believe what you do.And again here where you make the false presumption that I have psychological needs..so forgive me while I return these false accusations back to the sender.. no one wants your unwanted feelings thanks, and you have absolutely no proof, or any way of knowing if your projections are the experiences of the others.. this is all the work of ego, where the ego feels the need to feel superior for fear of losing face...I don't know if I am making myself clear... …
Such arrogance?I have repeated many times on this forum that all my knowledge of consciousness aka the self is expressed from my own personal ''direct experience'' and that I have chosen to think a little bit differently than say that of the ordinary conditioned man. …
Can you describe the techniques or methods you have used to have these 'direct experiences'?
And yet your language appears replete with 'I', 'you', 'both', 'personal', etc, etc?I choose to live and express myself from a Nondual context, as I am experiencing it. Just because it does not fit with your own particular model of what constitutes the philosopher's stone of philosophy doesn't make you right and I'm wrong, we are both right, because we are both expressing ourselves from our own unique ''direct experiences'' of how we see reality. I just happen to have been gifted with the brain capacity to be able to turn metal into gold. (metaphorically speaking) ..I don't expect you to understand what I mean by that, that's my personal pearl of wisdom that life has evolved in me as I experience it directly. …
So when you see dead things what do you think has happened to them?I have never died, so I would't have a clue mate. …
'I', 'your'?Bye the way, your typically programmed responses are just endless worn out clichés born out of the desperation of your ever increasing frustration to understand the Nondual context in which I choose to express myself. …
'I', 'myself', 'others'?Any more questions? I have all the answers at my disposal, that's why I personally have stopped asking myself questions. But I'm here to be of service to others out of the unconditional love I have for myself and others.