Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8385
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:56 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Greta wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: What are you talking about now? Do you even know what a 'straw man' is? Are you saying testosterone doesn't increase muscle mass and strength? I couldn't see the point of the article. I could understand it being newsworthy is she had won against male wrestlers.
No, just that you keep ranting and it's not the point, which is that when we consider nature and humanity's extended nature, we classify according to commonsense but it's only an approximation of a more complex reality. The issue for those in between is that, unlike many continua, the gender spectrum is largely pretty polarised, even more so than sexuality, so they are a tiny minority.
Pardon?
Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 6687
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by vegetariantaxidermy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:50 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Greta wrote: No, just that you keep ranting and it's not the point, which is that when we consider nature and humanity's extended nature, we classify according to commonsense but it's only an approximation of a more complex reality. The issue for those in between is that, unlike many continua, the gender spectrum is largely pretty polarised, even more so than sexuality, so they are a tiny minority.
Pardon?
Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8385
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:58 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Pardon?
Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
Have you STILL got your period?

I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 6687
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by vegetariantaxidermy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:04 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote: Are we not going slowly enough for you?
Would you prefer the world to be in black and white?
I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
Have you STILL got your period?

I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.
Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by. And stop moaning about Trump. He's your baby.

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8385
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:05 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
Have you STILL got your period?

I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.
Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by.
Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 6687
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by vegetariantaxidermy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:35 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Have you STILL got your period?

I only ask because you SO what to be treated as a woman.
Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by.
Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!
You are so smug and sure of your 'righteousness' that you don't even deign to argue (or that's the impression you want to give. You really have no argument). What makes you such a superior human being (along with your ilk) that you can dictate what everyone else can say or do?
Your movement needs to make these two photos its poster. 'A picture is worth...'
Image Image

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8385
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:10 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Lame jokes don't offend me. You see, there are grown up people around who don't get 'offended' by everything that the PC thought-police think others should be offended by.
Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!
You are so smug and sure of your 'righteousness' that you don't even deign to argue (or that's the impression you want to give. You really have no argument). What makes you such a superior human being (along with your ilk) that you can dictate what everyone else can say or do?
Your movement needs to make these two photos its poster. 'A picture is worth...'
Image Image
You're turning in to Bill, the picture posting idiot

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 6687
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by vegetariantaxidermy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:36 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote: Run along and tell your Nursey that the big boys have been naughty!
You are so smug and sure of your 'righteousness' that you don't even deign to argue (or that's the impression you want to give. You really have no argument). What makes you such a superior human being (along with your ilk) that you can dictate what everyone else can say or do?
Your movement needs to make these two photos its poster. 'A picture is worth...'
Image Image
You're turning in to Bill, the picture posting idiot
I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.

thedoc
Posts: 6393
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by thedoc » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:01 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I suppose two 'dyslexics' would understand each other.
How's that working out for you?

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8385
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:15 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.

So the fuck what?

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 6687
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by vegetariantaxidermy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:18 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.

So the fuck what?
Are you just pretending to be thick?

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8385
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:21 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I hardly ever post photos. Only when it's appropriate you racist hypocrite.
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.

So the fuck what?
Are you just pretending to be thick?
Two can play that game.

Image
Image

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 6687
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by vegetariantaxidermy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:25 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
1. Hilary in a head scarf
2. Dead babies.

So the fuck what?
Are you just pretending to be thick?
Two can play that game.

Image
Image
I feel embarrassed for you. :oops:

User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8385
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by Hobbes' Choice » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:27 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I feel embarrassed for you. :oops:
You're the one taking a crap!!!

User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 6687
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Gender relations - another way of looking at them

Post by vegetariantaxidermy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:30 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I feel embarrassed for you. :oops:
You're the one taking a crap!!!
Funny, it looks just like you.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests