He's persistent too.Peter Holmes wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 12:54 pmYep. People who claim there are moral facts always, funnily enough, claim to know what those moral facts are - and are often happy - or plan - to impose the consequences of those invented facts on everyone else.Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 11:15 amHe cannot answer your question because he thinks that his own thought are necessarily objective, like any tinpot tyrant.popeye1945 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 7:22 am
Veritas,
Knowing that all meaning is the property of a conscious subject and never the property of the object or the world as an object, how does your system of objectivity deal with this Truism? The concepts you're playing with are all the property of a conscious subject and meaning can only be bestowed upon an in-and-of-itself meaningless world. There is only meaning for biology, the measure and meaning of all things
These are the people who are the most danger to the human race.
He'll be telling you next that a raped woman has no right to her own body.
VA is quick to deny wanting to impose anything - but wants to manipulate the human brain to make us inclined to 'behave morally' - which is even more sinister.
But he has no substance.
I'm not sure why he can't see it when all around are telling him he is wrong.
I'm sure there is a name for that sort of psychological failing.