- Under the geocentric model, the Sun, Moon, stars, and planets all orbit Earth.
Wiki
- Two observations supported the idea that Earth was the center of the Universe:
First, from anywhere on Earth, the Sun appears to revolve around Earth once per day. While the Moon and the planets have their own motions, they also appear to revolve around Earth about once per day. The stars appeared to be fixed on a celestial sphere rotating once each day about an axis through the geographic poles of Earth.[2]
Second, Earth seems to be unmoving from the perspective of an earthbound observer; it feels solid, stable, and stationary.
-wiki
But then it took extra empirical evidence, effort, intelligence, rationality to get to the truth that the more realistic fact is that of the Heliocentric claim, i.e.
that it is the Earth that is orbiting around the Sun.
When the truth of the Heliocentric claim was made, Copernicus was heavily condemned and denounced in the worst manner.
And Galileo
- In 1633 Galileo Galilei was convicted of grave suspicion of heresy for "following the position of Copernicus, which is contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture",[148] and was placed under house arrest for the rest of his life.
wiki
The same event and condemnation of the Heliocentric claim is the same with the dogmatic grasp of the "No IS from Ought" [NOFI] claim.
This NOFI is very obvious from a short-sighted view based on the equivocation fallacy.
Those who disagree with the NOFI claim is regarded as stupid, mad, do not understand this or that, and that someday the 'penny will drop for them'.
But the point those who disagree with the NOFI claim view it as short-sighted despite the obvious. It is not they are blind nor ignorant of the NOFI claim but rather like the Heleocentrists, those who counter the NOFI are ignorant of the existence of moral facts just a Hume was ignorant of such moral facts. This is where Hume acknowledged his ignorance [inevitable during his time in the 1700s]
Note the above implied Hume was ignorant of the matter of fact of sensations related to moral issues where he merely assign them to unknown causes.Impressions may be divided into two kinds,
1. those of SENSATION and
2. those of REFLEXION.
The first kind [sensation] arises in the soul originally, from unknown causes.
The examination of our sensations belongs more to anatomists and natural philosophers than to moral; and therefore shall not at present be enter’d upon.
Treatise: Book I, Part I, SECTION II.: Division of the Subject
My point;
Those who are stuck with Hume NOFI are ignorant of the inherent moral potentials as programmed within all humans.