While there is a large number of people speaking English, the distribution of language speaker is widely spread around the world, note, Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, French, etc.Peter Holmes wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 12:03 pm Your premise - 'whatever is fact must be conditioned upon a specific framework and system of knowledge' - is false.
We English speakers use the word 'fact' to mean 'a feature of reality that is or was the case' - which has nothing to do with knowledge or description. And words can mean only what we use them to mean. You can object to this use of the word 'fact' - but so what? That's how we use it.
If your claim is that nothing exists outside a framework and system of knowledge - say it clearly, and prove it. Otherwise, your whole argument collapses. It's patent nonsense, of course.
To ground your argument on "We English speakers ..." is one of the worst defense in any philosophical argument. It is too flimsy!
In a way you are relying merely in a restricted linguistic FSK.
OTOH, I am relying heavily on the scientific FSK which is definitely more reliable than the linguistic FSK.
Show me what other FSK is more reliable than the scientific FSK?
If you claim there is something existing independent of the entanglement of a specific FSK, then prove it.
This is similar to what theists are claiming, i.e. God exist independent of all FSKs.