You are too ignorant.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 9:45 amPlease remind us that you are in no way indicating expertise in any scientific field in which you have done nothing but a 6 week intro course that offers no college credit.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 9:24 amWhatever I am going to propose I will make sure it is soundly verified and justified.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 9:11 am
Heavily, but pseudiferously. You are aping the look and feel of scientific method to the best of your abilities. But you are making up fake numbers for all of it, you are doing pseudoscience and magical thinking.
As a gnat you are ignorant and assuming I am like you.
I intend to bring in verified knowledge from various fields of knowledge [as evidence from many scientific course I had taken and intend to take] to justify and support my thesis.
You will fail to soundly verify or justify your numbers. none of the numbers you have routinely used to indicate how great you are and how insignifcant things you don't like are has ever been justified or even meaningful. What reason does anybody have to believe your new boast that some numbers you have et to share will be any better?
I am not implying that I will do the necessary research.
With basic knowledge of the various scientific knowledge, I will have more confidence in reading scientific research papers [with complex extensive terms, formulas, theories, concepts, principle, etc.] and making the relevant references rather than being totally ignorant of them.