bahman wrote: ↑Wed May 04, 2022 12:37 pm
A park is a public place so we have to refer to consensus.
So, consensus can control what you do.
No one.
Well, consensus, which is a majority, generally, since the ones who want to play music and the ones who want to listen to birds, at least some of them, will not want others to control their experience. So, a majority and perhaps sometimes a plurality will decide what you do.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Wed May 04, 2022 9:09 am
How about the boss/employee relationship? If we follow your rule of thumb, what does my boss get to decide about my clothes, actions, speech, facial expression, times of arrival or does he or she get to decide about others?
You have all rights.
So, you can show up when you want, wear what you want, choose your actions and so on at work?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Wed May 04, 2022 9:09 am
Speed of driving?
This is the duty of science.
Science may indicate how dangerous each speed is, but humans will have to determine how we prioritize speed vs. convenience, etc. To be perfectly same all driving could be kept under 10mph. Science cannot give us our priorities, though it can inform our decisions. Further, on the practical side. police will then be enforcing controls on people's freedom.
You are not free to lie about others.
But pretty much any court system cannot really differentiate between what you cannot prove is true and what is false. So, you may be restricted from telling a truth you cannot prove. And then there is a lot of interpretation. So, there will be restrictions on free specch.
No, that is against the right of fetus.
The mother decides even if keeping the fetus put her life in danger.
But in my example it was more the other way. The fetus is dying. Medicine can keep it alive. Are we not overriding the naturl process of the fetus?
When you have mental health and are mature enough.
So, parents and others do get to tell children what to do until then.
v