Your understanding of what is fact and reality is outdated. You have this 'analytical' arrogance that you are a philosophical-KING and everyone's ideas other than yours is wrong.Peter Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 15, 2022 7:01 pm 'If there are no moral facts, nothing is, or can be said to be, morally right or wrong.'
Whatever you are postulating is based on the Linguistic FSK which is useless unless linked to some more credible FSK.
The most credible facts we have at present are those from the Scientific Framework and System of Knowledge [FSK].
As long as there is a FSK what is true or false is conditioned upon that specific FSK.
Note the true or false of the Scientific FSK which is based on Model Dependent Realism, i.e.
Therefore whatever is true or false [scientific] is always relative to the scientific model, i.e. the FSK. As such, the claim that God Exists as Real is false within the Scientific FSK.Model-dependent realism is a view of scientific inquiry that focuses on the role of scientific models of phenomena.[1]
It claims reality should be interpreted based upon these models, and where several models overlap in describing a particular subject, multiple, equally valid, realities exist.
It claims that it is meaningless to talk about the "true reality" of a model as we can never be absolutely certain of anything.
The only meaningful thing is the usefulness of the model.[2]
The term "model-dependent realism" was coined by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow in their 2010 book, The Grand Design.
Moral facts are thus those are are verifiable and justified empirically and philosophically within a Moral FSK. As such there are moral facts conditioned upon the specific Moral FSK.
There is the Christianity Moral FSK and whatever is justified within the Christianity Moral FSK are true moral facts as qualified. Thus 'God exists as real' is true within the Christianity Moral FSK [e.g. because the holy texts said so] but it is ONLY and only within the the Christianity Moral FSK and not others.
Whilst there are Christian Moral Facts [as argued] these facts [conditional] are not credible [say 5-10/100] relative to scientific facts [50-80/100] because the Christianity Moral FSK is grounded on an illusory God is not credible.
Whilst the Christian Moral Facts are not credible, the Christian Moral System does and had been successful optimally in practice within the applicable constraints, within evolution and time-period up to the present. However it will loose its efficiency in the future given the expected changes within the human neural physiology and psychology.
Therefore it is philosophically irrational for you to generalize there are ABSOLUTELY [without qualifications] no moral facts.