Who in the end puts order?
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:57 pm
Who in the end puts order?
Hi all,
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws that this group of people follows specifying how violence plays out, so that violence isn't the law in the group, then people in the group follow violence, and whoever masters violence, this one in the group people follow and then people built an economy around this one, regardless who you want to give money to, but regardless how violence in the group plays out, and...
regardless of the time...people in the group want to play and have fun in their lives from their nature, or when people in the group don't want to have fun in their lives, then their lives are not fun, and then their lives are meaningless to them in reality, as nature doesn't seem to have a reason to make a not fun life meaningful over and over...and over in time...as it wouldn't be really funny for the one living such a life, would it really?
At the moment of birth of one of the people in the group, another one from the group has to be there, meaning another one has to be there to give birth to one, and another one is free after giving birth to kill one, but that doesn't make sense for another one to do at that moment, as the nature of another one is to want to raise one, and one has to understand, that regardless the nature of another one, nature's law is another one is really free to kill one, at the moment of birth.
When you have a group of people where violence is the law, over and over and over in time, in order for this group to sustain all the violence in reality, some are needed to give birth to the ones to commit violence from their nature, and some are needed to do that so that there are some still left, after all the violence is committed, and that happens by some deciding together who is not fun in the group, so that the rest in the group show to the ones who commit violence against the will of the ones who can give birth from their nature how...
...MAMA in the end puts order.
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws that this group of people follows specifying how violence plays out, so that violence isn't the law in the group, then people in the group follow violence, and whoever masters violence, this one in the group people follow and then people built an economy around this one, regardless who you want to give money to, but regardless how violence in the group plays out, and...
regardless of the time...people in the group want to play and have fun in their lives from their nature, or when people in the group don't want to have fun in their lives, then their lives are not fun, and then their lives are meaningless to them in reality, as nature doesn't seem to have a reason to make a not fun life meaningful over and over...and over in time...as it wouldn't be really funny for the one living such a life, would it really?
At the moment of birth of one of the people in the group, another one from the group has to be there, meaning another one has to be there to give birth to one, and another one is free after giving birth to kill one, but that doesn't make sense for another one to do at that moment, as the nature of another one is to want to raise one, and one has to understand, that regardless the nature of another one, nature's law is another one is really free to kill one, at the moment of birth.
When you have a group of people where violence is the law, over and over and over in time, in order for this group to sustain all the violence in reality, some are needed to give birth to the ones to commit violence from their nature, and some are needed to do that so that there are some still left, after all the violence is committed, and that happens by some deciding together who is not fun in the group, so that the rest in the group show to the ones who commit violence against the will of the ones who can give birth from their nature how...
...MAMA in the end puts order.
Re: Who in the end puts order?
If, in the end, MAMA puts order, then, in the beginning, is it DADA who puts disorder?butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 3:44 pm Hi all,
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws that this group of people follows specifying how violence plays out, so that violence isn't the law in the group, then people in the group follow violence, and whoever masters violence, this one in the group people follow and then people built an economy around this one, regardless who you want to give money to, but regardless how violence in the group plays out, and...
regardless of the time...people in the group want to play and have fun in their lives from their nature, or when people in the group don't want to have fun in their lives, then their lives are not fun, and then their lives are meaningless to them in reality, as nature doesn't seem to have a reason to make a not fun life meaningful over and over...and over in time...as it wouldn't be really funny for the one living such a life, would it really?
At the moment of birth of one of the people in the group, another one from the group has to be there, meaning another one has to be there to give birth to one, and another one is free after giving birth to kill one, but that doesn't make sense for another one to do at that moment, as the nature of another one is to want to raise one, and one has to understand, that regardless the nature of another one, nature's law is another one is really free to kill one, at the moment of birth.
When you have a group of people where violence is the law, over and over and over in time, in order for this group to sustain all the violence in reality, some are needed to give birth to the ones to commit violence from their nature, and some are needed to do that so that there are some still left, after all the violence is committed, and that happens by some deciding together who is not fun in the group, so that the rest in the group show to the ones who commit violence against the will of the ones who can give birth from their nature how...
...MAMA in the end puts order.
Re: Who in the end puts order?
Hello.butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 3:44 pm Hi all,
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws
As I recall the gist but not the exact words, The Duke tells us that because of the way folks are, if you put twenty people in a room, give each of them a dollar and leave them there long enough, eventually one of them will have twenty dollars.
What are the qualities and characteristics of this person?
Re: Who in the end puts order?
The one asking the question does.
No claim, no blame. So who asks must answer.
Re: Who in the end puts order?
To ask who ..implies there is a knower.. So the onus is on the knower of the question to answer, only the questioneer can know the answer to their own question.
Re: Who in the end puts order?
GREED and SELFISHNESS.Walker wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:29 amHello.butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 3:44 pm Hi all,
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws
As I recall the gist but not the exact words, The Duke tells us that because of the way folks are, if you put twenty people in a room, give each of them a dollar and leave them there long enough, eventually one of them will have twenty dollars.
What are the qualities and characteristics of this person?
Who else would stay locked up in a room for one dollar? Or, even twenty dollars?
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:57 pm
Re: Who in the end puts order?
In order for you to have fun in reality, you have to remember that all of the laws of nature have to happen from one moment to the next. Why?
Because the dead ones behave exactly as nature planned, and if you could have fun with less laws...do you think nature didn't think of that?
Cause if you really think that nature could plan for you to have fun with less laws, why didn't you tell nature before it all started?
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:57 pm
Re: Who in the end puts order?
Nah, player, you don't get the gist, read again, or wait for someone who does to reply.Walker wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:29 amHello.butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 3:44 pm Hi all,
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws
As I recall the gist but not the exact words, The Duke tells us that because of the way folks are, if you put twenty people in a room, give each of them a dollar and leave them there long enough, eventually one of them will have twenty dollars.
What are the qualities and characteristics of this person?
And who am I?
I am no one, I don't know who the hell you think you are! Why?
Cause you ain't someone, and you ain't fooling no one player!
Get the gist of that player?
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:57 pm
Re: Who in the end puts order?
Back to the subject players, if what you read is nonsense, ignore this thread, if you read nonsense and keep on replying to me, are you sure you are reading nonsense that you don't understand players? Why?
Cause if you really think about it, you will really understand players...
...this is exactly why.
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws that this group of people follows specifying how violence plays out, so that violence isn't the law in the group, then people in the group follow violence, and whoever masters violence, this one in the group people follow and then people built an economy around this one, regardless who you want to give money to, but regardless how violence in the group plays out, and...
regardless of the time...people in the group want to play and have fun in their lives from their nature, or when people in the group don't want to have fun in their lives, then their lives are not fun, and then their lives are meaningless to them in reality, as nature doesn't seem to have a reason to make a not fun life meaningful over and over...and over in time...as it wouldn't be really funny for the one living such a life, would it really?
At the moment of birth of one of the people in the group, another one from the group has to be there, meaning another one has to be there to give birth to one, and another one is free after giving birth to kill one, but that doesn't make sense for another one to do at that moment, as the nature of another one is to want to raise one, and one has to understand, that regardless the nature of another one, nature's law is another one is really free to kill one, at the moment of birth.
When you have a group of people where violence is the law, over and over and over in time, in order for this group to sustain all the violence in reality, some are needed to give birth to the ones to commit violence from their nature, and some are needed to do that so that there are some still left, after all the violence is committed, and that happens by some deciding together who is not fun in the group, so that the rest in the group show to the ones who commit violence against the will of the ones who can give birth from their nature how...
...MAMA in the end puts order.
Cause if you really think about it, you will really understand players...
...this is exactly why.
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws that this group of people follows specifying how violence plays out, so that violence isn't the law in the group, then people in the group follow violence, and whoever masters violence, this one in the group people follow and then people built an economy around this one, regardless who you want to give money to, but regardless how violence in the group plays out, and...
regardless of the time...people in the group want to play and have fun in their lives from their nature, or when people in the group don't want to have fun in their lives, then their lives are not fun, and then their lives are meaningless to them in reality, as nature doesn't seem to have a reason to make a not fun life meaningful over and over...and over in time...as it wouldn't be really funny for the one living such a life, would it really?
At the moment of birth of one of the people in the group, another one from the group has to be there, meaning another one has to be there to give birth to one, and another one is free after giving birth to kill one, but that doesn't make sense for another one to do at that moment, as the nature of another one is to want to raise one, and one has to understand, that regardless the nature of another one, nature's law is another one is really free to kill one, at the moment of birth.
When you have a group of people where violence is the law, over and over and over in time, in order for this group to sustain all the violence in reality, some are needed to give birth to the ones to commit violence from their nature, and some are needed to do that so that there are some still left, after all the violence is committed, and that happens by some deciding together who is not fun in the group, so that the rest in the group show to the ones who commit violence against the will of the ones who can give birth from their nature how...
...MAMA in the end puts order.
Re: Who in the end puts order?
Does 'Nature', Itself, even 'think'?butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 1:59 pm
In order for you to have fun in reality, you have to remember that all of the laws of nature have to happen from one moment to the next. Why?
Because the dead ones behave exactly as nature planned, and if you could have fun with less laws...do you think nature didn't think of that?
If yes, then HOW, EXACTLY?
You appear to have COMPLETELY MISSED or MISUNDERSTOOD my question posed to you here.butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 1:59 pm Cause if you really think that nature could plan for you to have fun with less laws, why didn't you tell nature before it all started?
AGAIN, if, as you propose and CLAIM, "MAMA puts 'order', in the end", then WHO puts 'disorder', and when does that ONE do it?
Re: Who in the end puts order?
butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 2:01 pmNah, player, you don't get the gist, read again, or wait for someone who does to reply.Walker wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:29 amHello.butimfeeling2022 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 3:44 pm Hi all,
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws
As I recall the gist but not the exact words, The Duke tells us that because of the way folks are, if you put twenty people in a room, give each of them a dollar and leave them there long enough, eventually one of them will have twenty dollars.
What are the qualities and characteristics of this person?
And who am I?
I am no one, I don't know who the hell you think you are! Why?
Cause you ain't someone, and you ain't fooling no one player!
Get the gist of that player?
All things exist in infinite potentiality but your interest is in manifestation.
The gist of manifestation cruxes upon conditions of human characteristics that actually are in play on the stage of the way things are, and the way things are is not necessarily what is rattling around inside any particular noggin, such as a totalitarian’s, in the form of a word salad.
What are these characteristics?
They are those that organize those twenty singles into one pocket, which is a natural ordering.
In the end, those characteristics point to who in the end puts order.
Begin your Quest there, Jonny.
btw: Playa (Player) sounds betta (better), although they aren't the fulsomeness of the sounds.
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:57 pm
Re: Who in the end puts order?
Nature had to do everything for anything living,
before anything living really lived inside nature,
so that there are simple rules for all living beings to follow,
and so that even animals can live inside nature.
So, either you player are thinking in a fun way, or...
...you player think you are funny...
...you ain't funny yet player, as...
...you player are the one putting disorder, what you think genius you know what seems to be happening in reality?!
Why didn't you come earlier to tell me about it then genius, wasn't it something that you genius imagined that was happening in reality over and over and over, genius?
What do you genius think?
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:57 pm
Re: Who in the end puts order?
Idiot what do you think you are doing here replying with your opinion, without arguments, ON MY THREAD IDIOT?!!!Walker wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:34 pm
All things exist in infinite potentiality but your interest is in manifestation.
The gist of manifestation cruxes upon conditions of human characteristics that actually are in play on the stage of the way things are, and the way things are is not necessarily what is rattling around inside any particular noggin, such as a totalitarian’s, in the form of a word salad.
What are these characteristics?
They are those that organize those twenty singles into one pocket, which is a natural ordering.
In the end, those characteristics point to who in the end puts order.
Begin your Quest there, Jonny.
DO YOU THINK YOU ARE FUNNY CLOWN, spending time and effort to write that what you read was nonsense IDIOT?!!!
Then why don't you IDIOT ignore nonsense?
How do you do that IDIOT?!
How about you don't reply and go do something else that is meaningful to you idiot, let's see if you idiot understand that...
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:57 pm
Re: Who in the end puts order?
Back to the subject, and this time try to stay on the subject players...
...cause up to now you idiots think that you are funny...
if you idiots are funny and this is nonsense to you, then what stops you from ignoring nonsense and reading and replying to only meaningful threads to you idiots?!!!
This is what we are discussing on this thread players, if you think you can, stay on the subject, and cut the nonsense with me.
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws that this group of people follows specifying how violence plays out, so that violence isn't the law in the group, then people in the group follow violence, and whoever masters violence, this one in the group people follow and then people built an economy around this one, regardless who you want to give money to, but regardless how violence in the group plays out, and...
regardless of the time...people in the group want to play and have fun in their lives from their nature, or when people in the group don't want to have fun in their lives, then their lives are not fun, and then their lives are meaningless to them in reality, as nature doesn't seem to have a reason to make a not fun life meaningful over and over...and over in time...as it wouldn't be really funny for the one living such a life, would it really?
At the moment of birth of one of the people in the group, another one from the group has to be there, meaning another one has to be there to give birth to one, and another one is free after giving birth to kill one, but that doesn't make sense for another one to do at that moment, as the nature of another one is to want to raise one, and one has to understand, that regardless the nature of another one, nature's law is another one is really free to kill one, at the moment of birth.
When you have a group of people where violence is the law, over and over and over in time, in order for this group to sustain all the violence in reality, some are needed to give birth to the ones to commit violence from their nature, and some are needed to do that so that there are some still left, after all the violence is committed, and that happens by some deciding together who is not fun in the group, so that the rest in the group show to the ones who commit violence against the will of the ones who can give birth from their nature how...
...MAMA in the end puts order.
...cause up to now you idiots think that you are funny...
if you idiots are funny and this is nonsense to you, then what stops you from ignoring nonsense and reading and replying to only meaningful threads to you idiots?!!!
This is what we are discussing on this thread players, if you think you can, stay on the subject, and cut the nonsense with me.
When you have a group of people and you give them money, but also it happens that there are no laws that this group of people follows specifying how violence plays out, so that violence isn't the law in the group, then people in the group follow violence, and whoever masters violence, this one in the group people follow and then people built an economy around this one, regardless who you want to give money to, but regardless how violence in the group plays out, and...
regardless of the time...people in the group want to play and have fun in their lives from their nature, or when people in the group don't want to have fun in their lives, then their lives are not fun, and then their lives are meaningless to them in reality, as nature doesn't seem to have a reason to make a not fun life meaningful over and over...and over in time...as it wouldn't be really funny for the one living such a life, would it really?
At the moment of birth of one of the people in the group, another one from the group has to be there, meaning another one has to be there to give birth to one, and another one is free after giving birth to kill one, but that doesn't make sense for another one to do at that moment, as the nature of another one is to want to raise one, and one has to understand, that regardless the nature of another one, nature's law is another one is really free to kill one, at the moment of birth.
When you have a group of people where violence is the law, over and over and over in time, in order for this group to sustain all the violence in reality, some are needed to give birth to the ones to commit violence from their nature, and some are needed to do that so that there are some still left, after all the violence is committed, and that happens by some deciding together who is not fun in the group, so that the rest in the group show to the ones who commit violence against the will of the ones who can give birth from their nature how...
...MAMA in the end puts order.