Mebbe you're right, age. The title is Roe Vs Wade? God the greatest Abortionist.. Sculptor indicts God.
Question is...
Sculpy doesn't believe in God. So he has nobody to "indict."henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:58 pm Nah, NOT AT ALL.
Mebbe you're right, age. The title is Roe Vs Wade? God the greatest Abortionist.. Sculptor indicts God.
Question is...
Man, you stole my thunder; short-circuited my process...I was gonna wait on age to respond, then spring it: sculptor really indicts theists, specifically Christians.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:11 pmSculpy doesn't believe in God. So he has nobody to "indict."henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:58 pm Nah, NOT AT ALL.
Mebbe you're right, age. The title is Roe Vs Wade? God the greatest Abortionist.. Sculptor indicts God.
Question is...
If anybody's kiling babies, it's the people who are killing babies. And that's by Sculpy's own lights.
Sorry...but you're right, so I guess I just couldn't help getting there.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:23 pmMan, you stole my thunder; short-circuited my process...I was gonna wait on age to respond, then spring it: sculptor really indicts theists, specifically Christians.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:11 pmSculpy doesn't believe in God. So he has nobody to "indict."henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:58 pm Nah, NOT AT ALL.
Mebbe you're right, age. The title is Roe Vs Wade? God the greatest Abortionist.. Sculptor indicts God.
Question is...
If anybody's kiling babies, it's the people who are killing babies. And that's by Sculpy's own lights.
The whole point of this thread is that (another boring attack on Christianity).
seems to me: the amoralist position ought be indifference to abortion...it's just meat, after allImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:45 pmSorry...but you're right, so I guess I just couldn't help getting there.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:23 pmMan, you stole my thunder; short-circuited my process...I was gonna wait on age to respond, then spring it: sculptor really indicts theists, specifically Christians.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:11 pm
Sculpy doesn't believe in God. So he has nobody to "indict."
If anybody's kiling babies, it's the people who are killing babies. And that's by Sculpy's own lights.
The whole point of this thread is that (another boring attack on Christianity).
And yes, of course. Sculpy should not even be unhappy about abortions, let alone see them as some reason for an indictment. Each murdered child should, for Sculpy, just be another triumph of "choice." Maybe there should be a parade and cake every time a baby is killed: "dead baby -- good" should be Sculpy's motto.
People just don't want to take the responsibility for their actions, unprotected sexual intercourse. So, when a girl becomes pregnant they say, it is just meat, it is a woman's body, etc.!henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:59 pmseems to me: the amoralist position ought be indifference to abortion...it's just meat, after allImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:45 pmSorry...but you're right, so I guess I just couldn't help getting there.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:23 pm
Man, you stole my thunder; short-circuited my process...I was gonna wait on age to respond, then spring it: sculptor really indicts theists, specifically Christians.
The whole point of this thread is that (another boring attack on Christianity).
And yes, of course. Sculpy should not even be unhappy about abortions, let alone see them as some reason for an indictment. Each murdered child should, for Sculpy, just be another triumph of "choice." Maybe there should be a parade and cake every time a baby is killed: "dead baby -- good" should be Sculpy's motto.
all this noise about a woman's right to choose: why the hell do the amoralists care?
Yes: and they say the "choice" happens when it comes to giving birth. But of the "choices" involved in irresponsible conception, they say nothing at all.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:17 pmPeople just don't want to take the responsibility for their actions, unprotected sexual intercourse. So, when a girl becomes pregnant they say, it is just meat, it is a woman's body, etc.!henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:59 pmseems to me: the amoralist position ought be indifference to abortion...it's just meat, after allImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:45 pm
Sorry...but you're right, so I guess I just couldn't help getting there.
And yes, of course. Sculpy should not even be unhappy about abortions, let alone see them as some reason for an indictment. Each murdered child should, for Sculpy, just be another triumph of "choice." Maybe there should be a parade and cake every time a baby is killed: "dead baby -- good" should be Sculpy's motto.
all this noise about a woman's right to choose: why the hell do the amoralists care?
funny, though, how the amoralist never thinks it thrubahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:17 pmPeople just don't want to take the responsibility for their actions, unprotected sexual intercourse. So, when a girl becomes pregnant they say, it is just meat, it is a woman's body, etc.!henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:59 pmseems to me: the amoralist position ought be indifference to abortion...it's just meat, after allImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:45 pm
Sorry...but you're right, so I guess I just couldn't help getting there.
And yes, of course. Sculpy should not even be unhappy about abortions, let alone see them as some reason for an indictment. Each murdered child should, for Sculpy, just be another triumph of "choice." Maybe there should be a parade and cake every time a baby is killed: "dead baby -- good" should be Sculpy's motto.
all this noise about a woman's right to choose: why the hell do the amoralists care?
Well that just says it all doesn't it, fuckface. You don't give a shit about cell clusters. You are just another bog standard misogynistic kunt. Your use of the word 'girl' is very telling.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:17 pmPeople just don't want to take the responsibility for their actions, unprotected sexual intercourse. So, when a girl becomes pregnant they say, it is just meat, it is a woman's body, etc.!henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:59 pmseems to me: the amoralist position ought be indifference to abortion...it's just meat, after allImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:45 pm
Sorry...but you're right, so I guess I just couldn't help getting there.
And yes, of course. Sculpy should not even be unhappy about abortions, let alone see them as some reason for an indictment. Each murdered child should, for Sculpy, just be another triumph of "choice." Maybe there should be a parade and cake every time a baby is killed: "dead baby -- good" should be Sculpy's motto.
all this noise about a woman's right to choose: why the hell do the amoralists care?
You apparently don't know what an ectopic pregnancy or parasitic twin are. They are both "fetuses," that can never become a human being.
I agree. It's not about sanctity of life.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 10:16 pm "I guess that you think that women's right must take precedent over the sanctity of life."
What is, "the sanctity of life?" There is no such thing. It's superstitious nonsense.