attofishpi wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 3:04 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 2:41 pm
attofishpi wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 4:53 am
Where the fuck are you getting that idea from you sick twisted piece of shit.
From you words, above.
If a person is not a person, and a child is not a child so long as she "requires support via an umbilical cord," then a baby is not a baby until that cord is gone, no?
But you don't need to be abusive.
You DISGUSTING piece of shit. The question was from Henry Quirk as to what constitutes a "PERSON", and from that in your SICK DERANGED mind you infer that means I would take a knife and kill that child. Either you are the stupidest Evangelist I have come across on a forum or just plain STUPID.
Take your pick which form of STUPID are you?
Hey, guy, you're the one who has viability as the measure. If the baby is attached to its mom via the umbilical, it's not a baby, not a person, right?
Or, mebbe, you mean as long as the baby is
dependent on the umbilical it's not a person (so, even if still connected, as long as it can fend for itself, it
is a person).
Mannie is just lookin' for clarity on your position, as am I.