wtf wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:54 am
attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:38 am
In the case you mentioned, consideration could be made to the fact that a married couple were willing to love and nurture the child once born, a far cry from a crack whore, possible someone that was raped that gets pregnant and is likely to raise a delinquent because the state will not allow her to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.
You lost me.
It appears so, you appear to lack the ability to distinguish between circumstances.
wtf wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:54 amLaci Peterson wasn't a crack whore, at least as far as anyone knows from the media coverage.
I never said she was. You need to improve reading comprehension.
wtf wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:54 amBut are you saying that the law applies differently to nice middle class people than it does to crack whores? You are losing the plot here.
I made the point that the US law is hypocrisy (you omitted) where on the one hand one swears on the holy bible in the court of law, and on the other hand can be sentenced to death - in total contradiction to the holy book held with such high regard.
So, NO I did not make any case for the law in a yay or nay way~! I simply stated the distinction that where a woman that has been raped decides to terminate an unwanted pregnancy should NOT be held to the same scrutiny as a loving couple that are pending bringing a child into the world.
DO YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE indeed DISTINCTION OF FACTS?
wtf wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:54 amI responded to your post when you said it's not murder to kill a fetus. I pointed out to you that the law does regard it as murder.
What LAW? Whose LAW? Understand there are different legislations across the entire planet - MOST of which are far more advanced than a country that HYPOCRITICALLY KILLS people that have placed there hand upon the 'holy bible' to tell the truth.