So, when people say, "our world", what that REALLY mean is that 'this world' is "nobody's world", correct?RCSaunders wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 1:49 amIt's nobody's world to run.Age wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:39 pmThe 'global population', of course.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:42 pm
I totally agree up to here. After this you've mixed the necessity of individual autonomy with some collective goals, which are contradictory:
You've simply replaced, "science," as the basis for authority with some notion of, "global good," as the basis for authority. Who defines what is the, "global good?"
If ANY one thinks that their own person view of what is right for the world is right, but it could not be in agreement with ALL, then OBVIOUSLY they are just Wrong.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:42 pm Who is, "we," and what do you intend to do with those who do not agree and choose not to cooperate to fulfill your personal vision of what is right for the world?
How much SIMPLER could this get?LOL Talk about a "crackpot" idea or view.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:42 pm I totally disagree with what you think is the correct way to run the world. For example: carbon sequestration, recycling, limitless clean energy, and sustainability are all crackpot ideas hatched by environmental totalitarians which if implemented would produce massive worldwide starvation, poverty, and social upheaval.
Do you really think that continual carbon releasing, not recycling, creating polluting energy, and the continual depleting of natural resources is the correct way to "run the world"?
If yes, then okay.
But if no, then what do you think is the correct way to "run the world"?
Here we have ANOTHER EXAMPLE of deflection and dishonesty.
Oh, and be the way, even if your conclusion was correct, which it obviously certainly is NOT, some people would prefer to live, with worldwide starvation, poverty, and social upheaval, than not be able to live at all. That is, what you "totally disagree" with, is what is actually slowing down the rate at which human beings will become extinct.
Oh, and by the way, when you say, "world", what exactly is 'it' you are meaning or referring to, exactly?
Does ANY one BELIEVE they or someone MUST "run the world"?RCSaunders wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 1:49 am The kind of megalomania that makes one believe they or someone must run the world is the cause of the worst horrors of history. It's sick! They are the one's that produce all the wars, oppression, poverty, starvation, and social horrors.
And if yes, then who are they, and what 'world' are they talking about and referring to, exactly?
So, when 'you', "rcsaunders", become extinct, then the better, correct?RCSaunders wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 1:49 am Quite frankly, the sooner those human beings who refuse to learn, think, and work, because they understand that one's life must be earned by one's own effort, and those political ideologists who cater to them become extinct the better.
After all it is 'you' who is refusing to learn, think, and work here. All you are doing here is SHOWING your OWN beliefs, 'trying to' control "others" by what they SHOULD be doing, and thus just REVEALING your OWN superiority complex, or authority,